Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1927 Cases
376 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Day v. Union Switch & Signal Co.
No. 841. Albert V. T. Day v. Union Switch and Signal Company. March 7, 1927. Messrs. Charles S. Jones and William S. Pritchard for petitioner. Mr. Ralph L. Scott for respondent.
Tucker v. Alexander
No. 850. W. C. Tucker v. Acel C. Alexander, Commissioner of Internal Revenue. March 7, 1927. Mr. C. H. Garnett for petitioner. Solicitor General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney Generad Willebrandt, Messrs. Sewall Key, A. W. Gregg, and Fred W.
Munich Reinsurance Co. v. First Reinsurance Co. of Hartford
No. 183. Munich Reinsurance Company v. First Reinsurance Company of Hartford. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Submitted March 1, 1927. Decided March 7, 1927. Messrs. Hartwell Cabell and John J. Cunneen for a
Nixon v. Herndon
NIXON v. HERNDON et al. ERROR TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EOR THE ' ■WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 117. Argued January 4, 1927. Decided March 7, 1927. 1. An action for damages may b.e maintained against judges of election for unlaw
Tumey v. Ohio
TUMEY v. OHIO. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP OHIO. No. 527. Argued November 29, 30, 1926. Decided March 7, 1927. 1. To subject a defendant to trial in a criminal case involving his liberty or property before a judge having a direct, persona
Stewart v. District Court of the United States
No. 835. Alexander B. Stewart v. District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California, Southern Division, et al. February 28, 1927. Messrs. C. ■ W. Pendleton and Marion DeVries for petitioner. Solicitor General Mitche
Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. Crawford
No. 830. Chicago, Indianapolis and Louisville Railway Company v. Alva Crawford. February 28, 1927. Messrs. John D. Black and, Edward G. Ince for petitioner. Messrs. Morse Ives and Herbert H. Patterson for respondent.
Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. City of Seattle
No. 874. Puget Sound Power and Light Company v. City of Seattle. February 28, 1927. Mr. James B. Howe for petitioner. No., appearance for respondent.
American Security Co. v. Steel's Consolidated, Inc.
No. 814. American Security Company and Albert Pice and Company v. Steel’s Consolidated, Inc. February 28, 1927. Mr. Alfred M. Saperston for petitioners.' Messrs. James C. Sweeney and Henry W. Killeen for respondents.
Bailey v. United States
No. 780. Luther J. Bailey and James E. Fulgham v. United States. February 28, 1927. Mr. Theodore D. Peyser• for petitioners. Solicitor General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Galloway, and Mr. Howard W. Ameli for the United States.
Goldstein v. United States
No. 786. Nathan Goldstein v. United States. February 28, 1927. Messrs. Thomas J.'Rowe, Jr., and Charles A. 'Houts for petitioner. Solicitor General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General ■ Willebrandt, and Mr. John J. Byrne for the United Sta
Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. Pennsylvania Railroad
No. 168. No. 178. Timken Roller Bearing Company v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company; and Thomas P. Goodbody, as Receiver of the Hydraulic Steel Company v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company. Error to the District Court of the United States for the
New York Central Securities Corp. v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.
No. 149. New York Central Securities Corporation v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company and New York Central Railroad Company. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio. A
Eiseman v. California
No. 722. J. J. Eiseman and Alexander R. Abrams v. State of California; and Holmes Ives and N. J. Whelan v. State of California. No. 723. Error to the District Court of Appeals, First Appellate District of the State of California. Submitted
Ex parte Phillips
No. —, original. Ex parte in the matter of Merle Phillips. February 28, 1927. Messrs. Frans E. Lindquist; William H. Mason, and Bich-ard O. Mason for petitioner.
Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co. v. United States
PAN AMERICAN PETROLEUM AND TRANSPORT COMPANY et al. v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 305. Argued October 4, 5, 1926. Decided February 28, 1927. 1. The evidence sustains findings that th
Tyson & Brother v. Banton
TYSON AND BROTHER — UNITED THEATRE TICKET OFFICES, INCORPORATED, v. BANTON, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, et al. APPEAL PROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK No. 261. Argued October 6, 7, 1926. Decided February 28
Zimmermann v. Sutherland
No. 181. No. 182. Leopold Zimmermann, Louis J. Rees, Maryan H. Hauser, et al., etc. v. Howard Sutherland, Alien Property Custodian, Frank White, Treasurer of the United States, et al.; and Deutsche Bank of Berlin, Germany v. Leopold Zimmerm
Calogero Maniglia ex rel. Maniglia v. Commander of the S. S. "Giuseppe Verdi,"
No. 235. Calogero Maniglia, by his next friend and father, Antonino Maniglia v. Commander of the S. S. “Giuseppe Verdi,” et al. February 21, 1927. Messrs. Clinton Robb and H. S. Avery for appellant.
Dickinson v. New England Power Co.
No. 803. Ida T. Dickinson, Luella J. Manning, Ellsworth Avery, et al. v. New England Power Company. February 21, 1927. Mr. Herman H. Field for petitioner. Mr. Frank W. Knowlton for respondent.
Konsoute v. Pennsylvania Railroad
No. 792. George N. Konsoute v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company. February 21, 1927. Mr. J. Thomas Hoffman for petitioner. Messrs. Frederic D. McKenney, John S. Flannery, and Robert D. Dalzell for respondent..
Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. Wiggins
No. 788. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Marion Wiggins, Individually and as Executrix and Trustee under the will of W. B. Wiggins, deceased. February 21, 1927. Messrs. Charles H. Carey, James B. Kerr, and Charles A. Hart for
United States v. McFarland
No. 801. United States v. W. A. McFarland and J. Norris McFarland, Copartners, trading as Henry Marcus and Son. February 21, 1927. Solicitor General Mitchell for the United States. Mr. William H. Hudgins for respondents.
Conner v. Bartlett
No. 176. Willie Conner and John Conner v. H. U. Bartlett, E. G. Bailey, McMann Oil Company, et al. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma. Motion to dismiss submitted January 24, 1927. Decided February 21, 1927. Messrs. W. H. F
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.