Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1927 Cases
376 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Hayman v. City of Galveston
HAYMAN v. CITY OF GALVESTON et al. APPEAL PROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP TEXAS No. 155. Submitted January 21, 1927. Decided February 21, 1927. 1. Quaere whether, in the circumstances mentioned in the opin
Swiss Oil Corp. v. Shanks
SWISS OIL CORPORATION v. SHANKS, AUDITOR. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY. No. 148. Argued January 21, 1927. Decided February 21, 1927. 1. Upon review of a decision of a state court construing the state law as
United States v. Trenton Potteries Co.
UNITED STATES v. TRENTON POTTERIES COMPANY et al. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS EOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 27. Argued November 30, December 1, 1926. Decided February 21, 1927. 1. A charge to a jury which was correctly given an
Smith v. Wilson
SMITH et al. v. WILSON et al. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 648. Argued January 5, 6, 1927. Decided February 21, 1927. 1. Section. 266 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of Feb
Fred T. Ley & Co. v. United States
FRED T. LEY & COMPANY INC. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 125. Argued January 14, 1927. Decided February 21, 1927. In a suit to recover the cost of public liability insurance paid under a building contract allowing r
Myers v. International Trust Co.
MYERS v. INTERNATIONAL TRUST COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE COUNTY OP SUFFOLK, STATE OP MASSACHUSETTS. No. 122. Argued January 12, 13, 1927. Decided February 21, 1927. 1. In Massachusetts, a partner who indorses a firm no
Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.
EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY OF NEW YORK v. SOUTHERN PHOTO MATERIALS COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 6. Argued November 19, 1925. Decided February 21, 1927. 1. Under § 12 of the Clayton Act, a suit against
Quon Quon Poy v. Johnson
QUON QUON POY v. JOHNSON, COMMISSIONER. APPEAL PROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT POR THE DISTRICT OP MASSACHUSETTS. No. 68. Argued December 9, 10, 1926. Decided February 21, 1927. 1. A hearing before a Board of Special Inquiry, in an im
Bowers v. New York & Albany Lighterage Co.
BOWERS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS COLLECTOR, v. NEW YORK & ALBANY LIGHTERAGE COMPANY. SAME v. SEAMAN. SAME v. FULLER. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS' FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. Nos. 366, 367, 368. Argued January 5, 1927. Decided February
Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Porter
MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. PORTER et al. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT’ OF ARKANSAS. No. 107. Submitted January 11, 1927. Decided February 21, 1927. 1. Section 1(6) of the Act to Regulate Commerce, requiring carriers to establish and
United States v. Burton Coal Co.
UNITED STATES v. BURTON COAL COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 100. Argued January 10, 1927. Decided February 21, 1927. 1. Where a buyer, in violation of an executory contract of sale, refuses to accept the commodity sold, the s
Smyer v. United States
SMYER et al. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 131. Argued January 14, 1927. Decided February 21, 1927. Moneys collected by a post office official under the Act of August 24, 1912, upon C.
Sacramento Navigation Co. v. Salz
SACRAMENTO NAVIGATION COMPANY v. SALZ. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 51. Argued December 2, 3, 1926. Decided February 21, 1927. 1. A contract for the transportation of cargo shipped on board a barge,
Davis Sewing Machine Co. v. United States
DAVIS SEWING MACHINE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 82. Argued January 6, 1927. Decided February 21, 1927. A claim for profits anticipated from the performance of a contract with the Government cannot be base
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. United States
LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 61. Argued January 6, 1927. Decided February 21, 1927. 1. A land-grant-aided railroad under a duty to carry government troops at not to exceed fi
Pueblo of Santa Rosa v. Fall
THE PUEBLO OF SANTA ROSA v. FALL, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, et al. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA No. 511. Argued January 11, 1927. Decided February 21, 1927. 1. A court has power at any stage of a ease to r
United States v. Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad
UNITED STATES et al. v. LOS ANGELES & SALT LAKE RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 414. Argued January 3, 4, 1927. Decided February 21, 1927. 1. A “ final ” valuation
Farrington v. Tokushige
FARRINGTON, GOVERNOR OF HAWAII, et al. v. TOKUSHIGE et al. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 465. Argued January 21, 1927. Decided February 21, 1927. 1. Acts of the Legislature of Hawaii “relating to fore
Louisiana & Western Railroad v. Gardiner
LOUISIANA & WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY v. GARDINER. ERROR AND CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE. OF LOUISIANA, FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 120. Argued January 12, 1927. Decided February 21, 1927. 1. Cause held reviewable by certiorari, no
American Railway Express Co. v. Royster Guano Co.
AMERICAN RAILWAY EXPRESS COMPANY v. ROYSTER GUANO COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE SPECIAL COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OP VIRGINIA. No. 116. Argued November 17, 18, 1925. Decided February 21, 1927. 1. Judgment holding petitioner liable in Virgi
American Railway Express Co. v. Kentucky
AMERICAN RAILWAY EXPRESS COMPANY v. KENTUCKY. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 5. Argued January 29, 1925; reargued November 17, 18, 1925. Decided February 21, 1927. 1. Upon review of a judgment of a state co
United States v. Ritterman
UNITED STATES v. RITTERMAN. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 669. Argued January 19, 1927. Decided February 21, 1927. 1. The crime of smuggling as defined by § 593(a) of the Tariff Act of 1922 is consum
Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. Oklahoma
OKLAHOMA NATURAL GAS COMPANY v. OKLAHOMA. SAME v. SAME et al. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. Nos. 154, 187. Submitted January 3, 10, 1927. Decided February 21, 1927. 1. At common law, and by the rule in tbe federal cou
Hellmich v. Missouri Pacific Railroad
HELLMICH, COLLECTOR, v. MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 507. Argued January 18, 1927 Decided February 21, 1927. 1. Messages transmitted for a railroad company by a tel
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.