Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1927 Cases
376 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
De Forest Radio Telephone Co. v. United States
DE FOREST RADIO TELEPHONE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 142. Argued January 20, 1927. Decided February 21, 1927. A license to make and use a patented article does not depend on formal language, and, as a def
Barrett Co. v. United States
BARRETT COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 105. Submitted January 7, 1927. Decided February 21, 1927. 1. After cancellation of a contract under which supplies were to be manufactured for the Government in a plant
Charleston Mining Co. v. United States
CHARLESTON MINING COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 93. Argued January 10, 1927. Decided February 21, 1927. 1. A finding of fraud in fact which, is not clearly erroneous will not b
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.
HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY et al. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 45. Argued December 2, 1926. Decided February 21, 1927. 1. Where a shipowner sues in admiralty to
Edenfield v. United States
No. 276. E. A. Edenfield v. United States. Certio-rari'to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Argued January 18, 19, 1927. Decided January 24, 1927. Mr. W. W. Larsen, with whom Messrs. Frank H. Saffold, John Dekle Kirkland,
United States v. Noveck
UNITED STATES v. NOVECK. ERROR TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR ‘THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 395. Argued January 5, 1927. Decided January 24, 1927. Section 253 of the Revenue Act of 1918 (id. Rev. Act of 1921) by making it
Jacob Reed's Sons v. United States
JACOB REED’S SONS v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 63. Argued January 6, 1927. Decided January 24, 1927. The Dent Act (March 2, 1919) gave no cause of action on contracts made without authority, or on dealings which di
Jones v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.
JONES et al., TRUSTEES, v. PRAIRIE OIL AND GAS COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN. DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA. No. 109. Argued January 11, 1927. Decided January 24, 1927. 1. Notice of an application of a mother
Celluloid Co. v. Massachusetts
No. 665. Celluloid Company v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts. January 17, 1927. .No appearance for defendant in error.
Mendez v. Bingham
No. 773. Arturo Mendez v. Justices Bingham, Anderson, and Johnson. January 17, 1927. Mr. Felix C. Devüa for petitioner. Solicitor General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Willebrandt, and Mr. John J. Byrne for respondents.
Mebane v. Staten Island Railway Co.
No. 126. Frank C. Mebane, as Receiver of Symes Foundation, Inc., and American Title and Trust Company v. Staten Island Railway Company, Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Company, New York Transit and Terminal Company et al. Error to the S
Thigpen v. Midland Oil Co.
No. 121. A. J. Thigpen and A. J. Thigpen, Jr., v. Midland Oil Company. Error to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Argued January 12, 1927. Decided January 17, 1927. Mr. Frank McCoy,, with whom Messrs. Elmer E. Grin-stead
Miller v. Oregon
No. 512. Frederick L. Miller v. State of Oregon. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oregon. Argued January 10, 11, 1927. Decided January 17, 1927. Mr. Edward W. Wickey, with whom Messrs Thomas Mannix, Jerry A. Matthews, and Josephus
Morgan's Louisiana v. Cocke
No. 104. Morgan’s Louisiana and Texas Railroad and Steamship Company and Yazoo and Mississippi Valley Railroad Company v. F. A. Cocke. Certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Argued January 10, 1927. Decided Januar
Damon ex rel. Chin Wing Dip v. Johnson
No. 133. Everett Flint Damon ex rel. Chin Wing Dip v. John P. Johnson, Commissioner of Immigration. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts. Motion to affirm submitted January 10, 1927. Decided
Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sutherland
GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY et al. v. SUTHERLAND, ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN. APPEAL PROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 53. Argued December 3, 6, 1926. Decided January 17, 1927. 1. Stock is pre
McGrain v. Daugherty
McGRAIN v. DAUGHERTY. APPEAL PROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 28. Argued December 5, 1924. Decided January 17, 1927. 1. Deputies, with authority to execute warrants, may be appointed by the Sergea
Mosler Safe Co. v. Ely-Norris Safe Co.
MOSLER SAFE COMPANY v. ELY-NORRIS SAFE COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS EOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 94. Argued January 7, 1927. Decided January 17, 1927. A manufacturer of safes which are' equipped with a patented “ ex-.
United States v. Huron Navigation Co.
No. 802. United States v. Huron Navigation Company. January 10, 1927.
Bank of Montreal v. Beacon Chocolate Co.
No. 762. Bank of Montreal v. Beacon Chocolate Company. January 10, 1927. Messrs. Louis S. Dent and Charles Y. Freeman for petitioner. Mr. Mitchell D. Follansbee for respondent.
American Railway Express Co. v. Rose
No. 757. American Railway Express Company v. Bert Rose and Arthur L. Lowe, Executors under the Will of George Rose. January 10, 1927. Messrs. Austin M. Pinkham and A. M. Hartung for petitioner. No appearance for respondents.
Cate v. United States
No. 750. C. G. Cate v. United States. January 10, 1927. Messrs. T. Pape Shepherd and Frank S. Carden for petitioner. Solicitor General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Luhring, and Messrs. Alfred A. Wheat, and Harry S. Ridgely for the U
Sinclair v. United States
No. 736. Harry F. Sinclair v. United States. January 10, 1927. Messrs. George P. Hoover, Martin W. Littleton, J. W. Zevely, and G. T. Stanford for petitioner. Messrs. Atlee Pomerene, Owen J. Roberts, and Peyton Gordon for the United States.
Wickwire v. Reinecke
No. 764. Jessie L. Wickwire, Individually and as Executrix and Trustee under the Last Will and Testament of Edward L. Wickwire v. Mabel G. Reinecke, as Collector and as Acting Collector of Internal Revenue, etc. January 10, 1927. Mr. Forest
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.