Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1927 Cases
376 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Ohio ex rel. Allen v. Lutz
No. 89. State of Ohio ex rel. K. B. Allen v. Joseph A. Lutz, as auditor of Montgomery County, Ohio. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Ohio. Submitted January 7, 1927. Decided January 10, 1927. Messrs. Earl H. Turner and Wellmore B.
Long v. Louisiana
No. 472. R. Burney Long v. State of Louisiana. Error to the Supreme Cohrt of the State of Louisiana. Argued January 6, 1927. Decided January 10, 1927. Mr.. M. C. Scharff, with whom Messrs. R. Burney Long, N. Vick Robbins, and Bernard F. Gar
Nelson v. Potts
No. 416. No. 417. Walter Nelson, Edwin Powell, John Hicks, et al., v. W. G. Potts, Treasurer of the State of Washington; and W. S. Cunningham, Redmond Freight Company, R. Strain, et al. v. W. G. Potts, Treasurer of the State of Washington.
Morris v. Duby
No. 372. R. B. Morris, doing business as Morris and Lowther et al. v. Wm. Duby, H. B: Van Duzer, and W. H. Malone, etc. January 10, 1927. Messrs. W. R. Crawford and Edwin C. Ewing for appellants. Messrs. I. H. Van Winkle and J. M. Devers fo
Missouri ex rel. Wabash Railway Co. v. Public Service Commission
MISSOURI, ex rel. WABASH RAILWAY COMPANY v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION. EEEOE TO THE SUPEEME COUET OP MISSOURI. No. 69. Argued December 10, 1926. Decided January 10, 1927. Upon review of a judgment of a state court, tbis Court has jurisdicti
James-Dickinson Farm Mortgage Co. v. Harry
JAMES-DICKINSON FARM MORTGAGE COMPANY et al. v. HARRY. ERROR TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP ILLINOIS. No. 40. Submitted November 29, 1926. Decided January 10, 1927. 1. Jurisdiction over a corporation of one
Larsen v. Texas
No. 658. S. F. Larsen v. State of Texas. January 3, 1927. No appearance for defendant in error.
Trainer v. Day
No. 735. James G. Trainer v. Darby A. Day. January 3, 1927. Mr. C. C. Daniels for petitioner. Mr. Thomas McCall for respondent.
Mammoth Oil Co. v. United States
No. 719. Mammoth Oil Company et al. v. United States. January 3, 1927. Messrs. George P. Hoover, John W. Lacey, Martin W. Littleton, Paul D. Cravath, J. W. Zevely, Edward H. Chandler, and G. T. Stanford for petitioners. Messrs. Atlee Pomere
Waggoner Estate v. Wichita County
WAGGONER ESTATE et al. v. WICHITA COUNTY ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 52. Argued December 3, 1926. Decided January 3, 1927. 1. Under Judicial Code § 238, before tbe Act of February 13, 1925, a d
United States ex rel. Vajtauer v. Commissioner of Immigration
UNITED STATES ex rel. VAJTAUER v. COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION. APPEAL PROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. No. 111. Argued November 24, 29, 1926. Decided January 3, 1927. 1. Want of due process in.pro
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. United States
GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL from the court op claims. No. 90. Submitted December 9, 1926. Decided January 3, 1927. In the provision in the Revenue Acts of 1918 and 1921, imposing a - stamp tax of two cents per “
McGuire v. United States
McGUIRE v. UNITED STATES. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT' COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT No. 85. Argued November 24, 1926. Decided January 3, 1927. Samples of intoxicating liquor constituting part of a quantity seized by federal offi
Oklahoma v. Texas
OKLAHOMA v. TEXAS, UNITED STATES, INTERVENER. No. 6, Original. Decree altered January 3, 1927. Decree declaring part of the boundary between Texas and Oklahoma;. ■ appointing and instructing a commissioner to survey and mark it, subject to
Public Utilities Commission v. Attleboro Steam & Electric Co.
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF RHODE ISLAND et al. v. ATTLEBORO STEAM & ELECTRIC COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP RHODE ISLAND. No. 217. Argued October 11, 12, 1926. Decided January 3, 1927. Where a company engaged in the generat
Wong Tai v. United States
WONG TAI v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE UNITED' STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 79. Argued November 24, 1926. Decided January 3, 1927. 1. The Court need not consider objections not contained in the assignm
Liberty Warehouse Co. v. Grannis
LIBERTY WAREHOUSE COMPANY et al. v. GRANNIS, COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY. ERROR TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT.' COURT EOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. No. 60. Argued December 7, 1926. Decided January 3, 1927. 1. Under Art. Ill of the Constit
Maguire v. United States
MAGUIRE AND COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 39. Argued December 1, 1926. Decided January 3, 1927. In a sale of cloth by the Government, a description, accompanying the advertisement for bids and giving the wei
Federal Trade Commission v. Pacific States Paper Trade Ass'n
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. PACIFIC STATES PAPER TRADE ASSOCIATION. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 71. Argued December 8, 1926. Decided January 3, 1927. 1. Where the facts stipulated before the Federal
Interstate Busses Corp. v. Holyoke Street Railway Co.
INTERSTATE BUSSES CORPORATION v. HOLYOKE STREET RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT POR THE DISTRICT OP MASSACHUSETTS. No. 343. Argued October 27, 28, 1926. Decided January 3, 1927. 1.’ The Massachusetts law requir
Di Santo v. Pennsylvania
DI SANTO v. PENNSYLVANIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 288. Argued October 27, 1926. Decided January 3, 1927. A state law requiring persons, other than railroad or steamship com-, panies, who engage within th
Byars v. United States
BYARS v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 72. Argued November 29, 1926. Decided January 3, 1927. 1. A state search warrant, based on an information alleging that .affiant “ has good reaso
Myers v. Hurley Motor Co.
MYERS v. HURLEY MOTOR COMPANY. CERTIFICATE FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 65. Argued December 9, 1926. Decided January 3, 1927. 1. .The fact that a contract made in infancy was induced by the infant’s fraudulent
Florida v. Mellon
FLORIDA v. MELLON, SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY, et al. No. —-, Original. Rule to show cause argued November 23, 1926. Rule discharged January 3, 1927. 1. To come within the original jurisdiction of this Court, a suit by a . State must be for
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.