Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1928 Cases
188 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Commercial Credit Co. v. United States
COMMERCIAL CREDIT COMPANY v. UNITED STATES CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT No. 258. Argued November 21, 22, 1927. — Decided February 20, 1928. 1. Upon review by certiorari, no questions will be considered ex
Liberty National Bank v. Bear
LIBERTY NATIONAL BANK OF ROANOKE v. BEAR, TRUSTEE. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS EOR THE EOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 218. Argued October 7, 1927. — Decided February 20, 1928. 1. Under § 5a of the Bankruptcy Act, a partnership may be ad
United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. v. Rosenberg Bros.
UNITED STATES SHIPPING BOARD EMERGENCY FLEET CORPORATION v. ROSENBERG BROTHERS & COMPANY. SAME v. CALIFORNIA WINE ASSOCIATION. SAME v. S. L. JONES & COMPANY. certiorari to the circuit court op appeals por the NINTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 119, 120, 1
Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. Town of Morristown
DELAWARE, LACKAWANNA AND WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY v. TOWN OF MORRISTOWN ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 147. Argued January 6, 9, 1928. — Decided February 20, 1928. The railroad company construct
T. Smith & Son, Inc. v. Taylor
T. SMITH & SON, INC. v. TAYLOR. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE PARISH OF ORLEANS, LOUISIANA. No. 186. Argued January 18, 1928. — Decided February 20, 1928. While a longshoreman, employed in the unloading of a vessel at dock, was stand
Mississippi ex rel. Robertson v. Miller
MISSISSIPPI EX REL. ROBERTSON v. MILLER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 206. Argued January 20, 1928. — Decided February 20, 1928. 1. After services have been rendered by a public officer under a law specifying his compensat
Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad v. Allen
TOLEDO, ST. LOUIS & WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY v. ALLEN. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP MISSOURI. No. 160. Argued January 10, 11, 1928. — Decided February 20, 1928. Plaintiff, while checking cars in a switching yard, was struck by a car s
United States v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.
UNITED STATES v. MAGNOLIA PETROLEUM COMPANY. CERTIORARI to the court oe claims. No. 283. Argued January 4, 1928. — Decided February 20, 1928. 1. Section 1019 of the Revenue Act of 1924, which provides that interest on a refund of any intern
Bountiful Brick Co. v. Giles
BOUNTIFUL BRICK COMPANY et al v. GILES et al. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF UTAH. No. 193. Argued January 18, 1928. — Decided February 20, 1928. 1. Liability may constitutionally be imposed under a workmen’s compensation law where there was
Kornhauser v. United States
KORNHAUSER v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 162. Submitted January 12, 1928. — Decided February 20, 1928. Claimant successfully defended an accounting suit brought by his former law partner respecting shares of stock
Brown v. United States
BROWN v. UNITED STATES. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 33. Argued October 14, 1927; reargued January 4, 1928. — Decided February 20, 1928. 1. The .provisions of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act creating
Richardson Machinery Co. v. Scott
RICHARDSON MACHINERY COMPANY v. SCOTT. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP OKLAHOMA. No. 198. Submitted January 17, 1928. — Decided February 20, 1928. 1. By the law of Oklahoma, where a person against whom a default judgment is rendered file
Gulf Fisheries Co. v. MacInerney
GULF FISHERIES COMPANY v. MacINERNEY. APPEAL PROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP TEXAS. No. 178. Argued January 16,1928. — Decided February 20, 1928. A state license tax upon dealing in fish, regulated accordi
Brimstone Railroad & Canal Co. v. United States
BRIMSTONE RAILROAD AND CANAL COMPANY v. UNITED STATES et al. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA No. 240. Argued October 10, 11, 1927. — Decided February 20, 1928. 1. An order of the Interstate
Denney v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.
DENNEY, AS DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS OF WASHINGTON, et al., v. PACIFIC TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY. SAME v. HOME TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY. APPEALS FROM UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. Nos. 150 and
Liberty Warehouse Co. v. Burley Tobacco Growers' Co-operative Marketing Ass'n
LIBERTY WAREHOUSE COMPANY v. BURLEY TOBACCO GROWERS’ CO-OPERATIVE MARKETING ASSOCIATION. ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP KENTUCKY. No. 18. Argued February 23, 1927. — Decided February 20, 1928. 1. A party challenging a judgment of a state
Longest v. Langford
LONGEST v. LANGFORD. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP OKLAHOMA'. No. 52. Submitted October 19, 1927. — Decided February 20, 1928. Under § 22 of the Choctaw and Chickasaw Agreement of July 1, 1902, lands allotted in the name of a married C
Marlin v. Lewallen
MARLIN v. LEWALLEN et al. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OE OKLAHOMA. No. 40. Argued October 18, 1927. — Decided February 20, 1928. 1. The surviving husband of a woman of the Creek blood and tribe, whether himself of that blood or not, has
Harkin v. Brundage
HARKIN et al., RECEIVERS, v. BRUNDAGE, RECEIVER, et al. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 117. Argued December 5, 6, 1927. — Decided February 20, 1928. 1. As between two courts of concurrent and coordina
Linstead v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
LINSTEAD, EXECUTRIX, v. CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 171. Submitted January 11, 1928. — Decided February 20, 1928. Train crews of the Big Four Railroad, operating u
Wuchter v. Pizzutti
WUCHTER v. PIZZUTTI. ERROR to the court of errors and appeals of new JERSEY. No. 142. Argued January 5, 1928. — Decided February 20, 1928. 1. A state statute which provides that in actions by residents of the State against non-residents for
Finance & Guaranty Co. v. Oppenhimer
FINANCE AND GUARANTY COMPANY v. OPPENHIMER, TRUSTEE. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 170. Argued January 13, 1928. — Decided January 23, 1928. 1. Section 5224 of the Code of Virginia providing that all
In re Gilbert
IN RE GILBERT. ON RULE TO SHOW CAUSE. Argued January 16, 1928. — Decided January 23, 1928. 1. The right of one who was a master in the federal court to retain money paid him by a party in excess of the compensation found permissible by this
Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. Rellstab
DELAWARE, LACKAWANNA AND WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY v. RELLSTAB. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF-APPEALS FOR THE ■ THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 141. Argued January 5, 1928.- — -Decided January 16, 1928. 1. The power of the District Court to set asid
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.