Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1928 Cases
188 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United States v. Manzi
UNITED STATES v. MANZI. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 204. Argued February 23, 1928. — Decided April 9, 1928. 1. The widow of an alien who died after declaring his intention to become a citizen but be
Wilson v. Pacific Mail Steamship Co.
WILSON et al. v. PACIFIC MAIL STEAMSHIP COMPANY et al. PACIFIC MAIL STEAMSHIP COMPANY et al. v. WILSON ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS EOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 146 and 173. Argued January 6, 1928. — Decided April 9, 192
Untermyer v. Anderson
UNTERMYER, EXECUTRIX, et al. v. ANDERSON, COLLECTOR. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 221. Argued February 27, 1928. — Decided April 9, 1928. 1. The gift tax provisions of the Revenue Act, approved June
Larkin v. Paugh
LARKIN v. PAUGH et al. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA No. 137. Argued December 9, 1927. — Decided April 9, 1928. 1. Rev. Stats., § 2448, providing that where a patent for “public lands ” shall issue in pursuance of any law of t
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Leitch
CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY v. LEITCH. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA. No. 98. Argued March 14, 1928. — Decided April 9, 1928. A locomotive engineer assumes the risk of being struck by a mail crane or ma
Casey v. United States
CASEY v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS EOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 500. Argued January 11, 1928. — Decided April 9, 1928. 1. Where evidence in a criminal trial tends to prove inferentially that the offence was wit
J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United States
J. W. HAMPTON, JR., & COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF CUSTOMS APPEALS. No. 242. Argued March 1, 1928. — Decided April 9, 1928. 1. Section 316 (a), Title III, of the Tariff Act of Sept. 21, 1922, empowers a
Krauss Bros. Lumber Co. v. Mellon
KRAUSS BROTHERS LUMBER COMPANY v. MELLON et al. certiorari to the circuit court op appeals for the fifth circuit. No. 342. Argued March 7, 1928. — Decided April 9, 1928. Exhibits sent by the trial court to the reviewing court may be identif
Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.
CORONA CORD TIRE COMPANY v. DOVAN CHEMICAL CORPORATION. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 182. Argued January 16, 17, 1928. — Decided April 9, 1928. 1. Discovery that a change of ingredients in a process
Nigro v. United States
NIGRO v. UNITED STATES. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 600. Argued January 11, 12, 1928. — Decided April 9, 1928. 1. In § 2 of the Anti-Narcotie Act, as amended, which provides that it shall be unl
Swift & Co. v. United States
SWIFT & COMPANY et al. v. UNITED STATES. CERTIFICATE FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 181. Argued October 3, 4, 1927; reargued January 3, 4, 1928.— Decided March 19, 1928. 1. Where a consent decree, entered in a su
Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. American Valve & Meter Co.
FAIRBANKS, MORSE & COMPANY et al. v. AMERICAN VALVE & METER COMPANY et al. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 262. Returns to rule to show cause submitted February 20, 1928. — Decided March 19, 1928. 1.
Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Jones
KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. JONES, ADMINISTRATOR. CERTIORARI to the SUPREME COURT OE TEXAS. No. 349. Argued March 8, 1928. — Decided March 19, 1928. An experienced car inspector was found dead with Ms lantern, at night, between
Mitchell v. Hampel
MITCHELL et al. v. HAMPEL et al. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 269. Argued March 2, 1928. — Decided March 19, 1928. When a creditor holds an obligation of a bankrupt firm upon which members of the par
In re Gilbert
IN RE GILBERT. PROCEEDINGS for disbarment or contempt. Order entered March 19, 1928. 1. The former order of this Court, 259 U. S. 101, limiting the compensation allowable to the respondent herein, as master in the New York Gas cases, applie
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. United States
GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 159. Argued January 10, 1928. — Decided March. 12, 1928. 1. A lease to the United States for a term of years, made without any specific authority of law
McMaster v. Gould
McMASTER et al. v. GOULD et al. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP NEW YORK No. 85. Argued October 28, 1927. — Decided March 5, 1928. By the law of New York (Civ. Pr. Act. § 588), appeals from judgments of the Supreme Court, Appellate Divis
Levy v. Industrial Finance Corp.
LEVY v. INDUSTRIAL FINANCE CORPORATION, ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 217. Argued February 24, 1928. — Decided March 5, 1928. Section 14b (3) of the Bankruptcy Act which withholds a discharge f
Miller v. Schoene
MILLER et al. v. SCHOENE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA. No. 199. Argued January 20, 1928. — Decided February 20, 1928. 1. An Act of Virginia provides, compulsorily, for the cutting down of red cedar trees within two roñ
Saltonstall v. Saltonstall
SALTONSTALL et al. v. SALTONSTALL et al., TRUSTEES. ERROR TO THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 144. Argued January 5, 6, 1928. — Decided February 20, 1928. 1. A decision of a state court applying a state statute over the ambi
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Priester
WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. PRIESTER. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS AND THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA Nos. 183 and 189. Argued January 17, 1928. — Decided February 20, 1928. 1. Where the supreme court of a State, in denying a pet
Interstate Busses Corp. v. Blodgett
INTERSTATE BUSSES CORPORATION v. BLODGETT et al. APPEAL PROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. No. 197. Argued January 19, 20, 1928. — Decided February 20, 1928. 1. Where an application for an interlocutory i
People of Sioux County v. National Surety Co.
PEOPLE OF SIOUX COUNTY, NEBRASKA, v. NATIONAL SURETY COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 196. Argued January 19, 1928. — Decided February 20, 1928. 1. The liability of the surety on a bond given b
Hellmich v. Hellman
HELLMICH, COLLECTOR, v. ISADORE N. HELLMAN. SAME v. MILTON C. HELLMAN. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE_ EIGHTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 299, 300. Argued January 4, 5, 1928. — Decided February 20, 1928. 1. Under the Revenue Act of 19
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.