Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1928 Cases
188 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
City of Gainesville v. Brown-Crummer Investment Co.
CITY OF GAINESVILLE v. BROWN-CRUMMER INVESTMENT COMPANY et al. No. 433. Argued. April 13, 1928. — Decided May 14, 1928. Mr. W. O. Davis, with whom Mr. Cecil Murphy was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Alex. F. Weisberg, with whom Messrs. J
Louisville Gas & Electric Co. v. Coleman
LOUISVILLE GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY v. COLEMAN, AUDITOR. No. 70. Argued October 26, 1927. Reargued February 29, 1928.— Decided April 30, 1928. Mr. Matthew? O’Dogherty, with whom Mr. Alex P. Humphrey was on the brief, for plaintiff in error. M
Coffin Bros. & Co. v. Bennett
COFFIN BROTHERS & COMPANY et al. v. BENNETT. No. 465. Argued April 17, 1928. Decided April 30, 1928. Méssrs. G. Y..Harrell and R. S. Wimberly submitted for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Orville A. Park, with whom Mr. Carl N. Davie was oh the bri
Brooke v. City of Norfolk
BROOKE v. CITY OF NORFOLK et al. No. 229. Argued April 10, 11, 1928. Decided April 23, 1928. Mr. Robert B. Tunstall, with whom flfrr. Nathaniel T. Oreen was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. E. Warren Wall for respondents. In the case of pe
Williams v. Great Southern Lumber Co.
WILLIAMS v. GREAT SOUTHERN LUMBER COMPANY. No. 252. Argued March 1, 2, 1928. Decided April 16, 1928. Messrs. W. J. Waguespack an.d A. F. Higgins, with whom Mr. Max M. Schaumburger was on the brief, for petitioner.- Mr. H. Generes Dufour, wi
Blodgett v. Silberman
BLODGETT v. SILBERMAN et al. SILBERMAN et al. v. BLODGETT. Nos. 190 and 191. Argued March 12, 13, 1928. Decided April 16, 1928. . Mr. Charles E. Hughes, with whom Messrs. Benjamin W. Ailing, F\arwell Knapp, Lucius F. Robinson, and John F. C
Heiner v. Tindle
HEINER, COLLECTOR, v. TINDLE et al. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 341. Argued March 7, 1928. — Decided April 9, 1928. 1. Under the Revenue Act of 1918, § 215, (a), 5, the devotion of a house theretofo
Shaw v. Gibson-Zahniser Oil Corp.
SHAW, AUDITOR, v. GIBSON-ZAHNISER OIL CORPORATION et al. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 234. Argued February 29, March 1,1928. — Decided April 9,1928. Land belonging to a non-Indian citizen of Okla
Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. Risty
CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL & PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. RISTY et al. APPEAL PROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT POR THE DISTRICT OP SOUTH DAKOTA. No. 501. Argued February 21, 23, 1928. — Decided April 9, 1928. 1. A decree dismissing a
Work v. Braffet
WORK, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, v. BRAFFET, ADMINISTRATOR. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 344. Argued March 8, 1928. — Decided April 9, 1928. 1. Under Rev. Stats. § 2347, and Rule I of the Regulations o
New Mexico v. Texas
NEW MEXICO v. TEXAS. IN EQUITY. No. 2, Original. Decree entered April 9, 1928. Decree overruling the exceptions of New Mexico to the master's report and sustaining those of Texas; dismissing the bill and sustaining the cross bill; declaring
New Mexico v. Texas
NEW MEXICO v. TEXAS. IN EQUITY. ON PETITION FOR REHEARING. No. 2, Original. Decided April 9, 1928. Correction of the opinion delivered in this case December 5, 1927. The corrections specified by the following memorandum are embodied in the
City of New Brunswick v. United States
CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS EOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 260. Argued March 2, 1928. — Decided April 9, 1928. 1. Land acquired by the United States Housing Corporation under t
Danciger & Emerich Oil Co. v. Smith
DANCIGER AND EMERICH OIL COMPANY v. SMITH. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS, FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 224. Argued February 27, 1928. — Decided April 9, 1928. 1. An adjudication in bankruptcy, until followed by t
Moore v. City of Nampa
MOORE v. CITY OF NAMPA. CERTIORARI to the circuit court of appeals for the NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 384. Argued March 9, 1928. — Decided April 9, 1928. Bonds issued'by a city to complete a local improvement, which did not pledge the city’s genera
Black & White Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Brown & Yellow Taxicab & Transfer Co.
BLACK AND WHITE TAXICAB AND TRANSFER COMPANY v. BROWN AND YELLOW TAXICAB AND TRANSFER COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR TPIE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 174. Argued January 13, 16, 1928.— Decided April 9, 1928. A Kentucky railr
Donnelley v. United States
DONNELLEY v. UNITED STATES. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 110. Argued November 22,1927. Reargued January 19,1928.— Decided April 9, 1928. 1. After certification of a question by the Circuit Court o
Montana National Bank v. Yellowstone County of Montana
THE MONTANA NATIONAL BANK OF BILLINGS v. YELLOWSTONE COUNTY OF MONTANA et al. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA. No. 207. Argued January 20, 1928. — Decided April 9, 1928. 1. A substantial discrimination against national ba
Grosfield v. United States
GROSFIELD et al. v. UNITED STATES. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 62. Argued January 4, 1928. — Decided April 9, 1928. 1. The purpose of the provision of the National Prohibition Act authorizing an
Humes v. United States
HUMES ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI to the court oe claims. No. 376. Argued March 9, 1928. — Decided April 9, 1928. Under § 403 (a) (3), of the Revenue Act of 1918, which provides that bequests to charitable corporations may be deduct
Midland Valley Railroad v. Barkley
MIDLAND VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY v. BARKLEY et al. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP ARKANSAS. No. 375. Argued March 9, 1928. — Decided April 9, 1928. A railroad, in a time of coal-car shortage, distributed open-top cars to tipple mines, wh
Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. Northside Belt Railway Co.
TEXAS & NEW ORLEANS RAILROAD COMPANY v. THE NORTHSIDE BELT RAILWAY COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 231. Argued February 28, 1928. — Decided April 9, 1928. 1. A suit under paragraphs 18 to 20 of
Lamborn v. National Bank of Commerce
LAMBORN et al. v. THE NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE OF NORFOLK. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 163. Argued January 12, 1928. — Decided April 9, 1928. On behalf of a client who had agreed to buy and pay fo
Alaska Packers Ass'n v. Industrial Accident Commission
ALASKA PACKERS ASSOCIATION v. INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION et al. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 266. Argued March 2, 1928. — Decided April 9, 1928. A person employed by a fishing and canning company as a seaman, fishe
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.