Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1929 Cases
235 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. Winters
SANITARY REFRIGERATOR COMPANY v. WINTERS ET AL. WINTERS ET AL. v. DENT HARDWARE COMPANY. Nos. 4 and 14. Argued April 19, 22, 1929. Decided October 14, 1929. See 20 F. (2d) 671. Mr. E. Hayward Fairbanks for Sanitary Refrigerator Company and
Federal Trade Commission v. Klesner
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. KLESNER. No. 8. Argued April 10, 1929. Decided October 14, 1929. For earlier decisions in the same case, see 6 F. (2d) 701; 274 U. S. 145. Mr. Adrien F. Busick, Assistant Chief Counsel, Federal Trade Commission,
Gonzalez v. Roman Catholic Archbishop
GONZALEZ v. ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF MANILA. No. 6. Argued April 8, 9, 1929. Decided October 14, 1929. Mr. Howard Thayer Kingsbury, with whom Messrs.. Frederic R. Coudert and Allison D. Gibbs were on the brief; for petitioner. Mr. Willi
Alderman v. United States
No. 935. Alderman v. United States.
Wilcox v. United States
No. 645. Wilcox v. United States.
Kirk v. Providence Mill Co.
KIRK, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, et al. v. THE PROVIDENCE MILL COMPANY. No. 675. Argued April 26, 1929. Decided June 3, 1929. Mr. Gilbert Bettman, Attorney General of Ohio, with whom Messrs. L. F. Laylin, Joseph A. Godown; and Leroy W.
Kirk v. Maumee Valley Electric Co.
KIRK, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, et al. v. MAUMEE VALLEY ELECTRIC COMPANY. No. 674. Argued April 25, 26, 1929. Decided June 3, 1929. Mr. George W. Ritter, with whom .Messrs. Gilbert Bett~ man, Attorney General of Ohio, L. F. Laylin, Jo
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Jones
MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY v. JONES. No. 524. Argued April 18, 1929. Decided June 3, 1929. Mr. Walter L. Clark, with whom Messrs. John Ralph Wilson, W. G. Bonta, and Roszel C. Thomsen were on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Nat Schmulowitz, w
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Driggers
ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY v. DRIGGERS. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 225. Argued January 18, 1929. Reargued April 9, 10, 1929. Decided June 3, 1929. Mr. Thomas' W. Davis, with whom Messrs. Simeon Hyde, R.
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United States
BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 563. Argued April 24, 1929. Decided June 3, 1929. Mr. Frederic D. McKenney, with whom Messrs. Morison R. Waite, Theodore Schmidt, and John S. Flannery were on the brief, f
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United States
ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 466. Argued April 11, 1929. Decided June 3, 1929. Mr. R. S. Outlaw, with whom Messrs. A. B. Enoch, H. H. Larimore, E. E. Mclnnis, M. L. Bell, W. F. Dickinson,and
Sinclair v. United States
SINCLAIR et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 748. Argued April 22, 23, 1929. Decided June 3, 1929. Messrs. Martin W. Littleton and George P. Hoover for Sinclair. Messrs. Daniel Thew Wright and Philip Ershler for Day. Mr. Charles A. Douglas, with w
Ancient Egyptian Arabic Order of Nobles of the Mystic Shrine v. Michaux
ANCIENT EGYPTIAN ARABIC ORDER OF NOBLES OF THE MYSTIC SHRINE et al. v. MICHAUX et al. No. 7. Argued January 12, 13, 1928. Decided June 3, 1929. Mr. Harold 8. Davis, with whom Mr. Moorfield Storey was on the brief, for petitioners. Mr. Claud
United States v. Boston & Maine Railroad
UNITED STATES v. BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD. No. 129. Argued January 10, 11, 1929. Reargued April 15, 1929. Decided June 3, 1929. Mr. Alfred A. Wheat, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, with whom Attorney General Mitchell, Assistant At
Old Colony Trust Co. v. Commissioner
OLD COLONY TRUST COMPANY et al. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. No. 130. Argued January 10, 11, 1929. Reargued April 15, 1929. Decided June 3, 1929. Mr. Arthur A. Ballantine, with whom Mr. George E. Cleary was oh the brief, for Old Col
Gulf Refining Co. v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance
GULF REFINING COMPANY v ATLANTIC MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. No. 506. Argued April 17, 1929. Decided May 27, 1929. Mr. Ira A. Campbell for petitioner. Mr. J. M. Richardson Lyeth for respondent.
White River Lumber Co. v. Arkansas ex rel. Applegate
WHITE RIVER LUMBER COMPANY v. ARKANSAS ex rel. APPLEGATE, ATTORNEY GENERAL. No. 101. Argued January 7, 8, 1929. Decided May 27, 1929. Mr. Thomas S. Buzbee, with whom Messrs. George B. Pugh, H. T. Harrison, and A. S. Buzbee were on the brief
Pocket Veto Case
THE POCKET VETO CASE. No. 565. Argued March 11, 1929. Decided May 27, 1929. Mr. William S. Lewis, with whom Messrs. A. R. Serven and John Q. Carter were on the brief, for petitioners. Attorney General Mitchell, with whom Mr. Robert P. Reede
United States v. Schwimmer
UNITED STATES v. SCHWIMMER. No. 484. Argued April 12, 1929. Decided May 27, 1929. Mr. Alfred A. Wheat, with whom Attorney General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney Generad Luhring, and Mr. Harry S. Ridgely were on the brief, for the United State
Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Henderson
WESTERN & ATLANTIC RAILROAD v. HENDERSON et al. No. 519. Argued April 17, 1929. Decided May 27, 1929. Mr. Fitzgerald Hall, with whom Messrs. Frank Siemens and Walton Whitwell were on the brief, for appellant. Mr. Reuben R. Arnold, with whom
Macallen Co. v. Massachusetts
THE MACALLEN COMPANY v. MASSACHUSETTS. No. 578. Argued April 25, 1929. Decided May 27, 1929. Mr. Thomas Allen for appellant. Mr. B: Ammi Cutter, Assistant Attorney General of Massachusetts, with whom Mr. Joseph E. Warner, Attorney General,
Barry v. United States ex rel. Cunningham
BARRY, SERGEANT-AT-ARMS of the UNITED STATES SENATE, et al. v. UNITED STATES ex rel. CUNNINGHAM. No. 647. Argued April 23, 1929. Decided May 27, 1929. Mr. George W. Wickersham, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, with whom Attorney G
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Stapleton
CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY v. STAPLETON. No. 133. Submitted January 2, 1929. Restored to docket and argued April 9, 1929. Decided May 27, 1929. Mr. Le Wright Browning for petitioner. Mr. George B. Martin for respondent.
Buzynski v. Luckenbach S. S. Co.
No. 905. Buzynski v. Luckenbach S. S. Co., Inc., et al.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.