Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1929 Cases
235 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Connecticut v. Massachusetts
No. 13, original. Connecticut v. Massachusetts. Motion submitted April 15, 1929. Decided April 22, 1929. Mr. Ernest L. Averill for complainant, in support of the motion. Mr. Bentley W. Warren for defendant in opposition thereto.
Posados v. Warner, Barnes & Co.
POSADOS, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. WARNER, BARNES & COMPANY, ltd. POSADOS, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. MENZI. Nos. 251 and 252. Argued February 26, Í929. Decided April 22, 1929. Mr. Wm. Qattron Rigby, Judge Advocate, with whom
Roschen v. Ward
ROSCHEN v. WARD, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW YORK, et al. S. S. KRESGE COMPANY v. SAME. Nos. 667 and 668. Argued April 10, 1929. Decided April 22, 1929. Mr. Walter N. Seligsberg, with whom Mr. I. Maurice Wormser was on the brief, for appellants
Weiss v. Wiener
WEISS, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. WIENER. ROUTZAHN, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. SAME. Nos. 482 and 483. Argued April 12, 1929. Decided April 22, 1929. Mr. T. H. Lewis, Jr., with whom Attorney General Mitchell, Assistant Attorne
Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. Minnesota
No. 632. Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. Minnesota. Jurisdictional statement submitted April 8, 1929. Decided April 15, 1929. Messrs. George W. Morgan and Cleon Headley for appellant. No appearance for appellee.
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Chatters
LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY v. CHATTERS. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY et al. v. SAME. Nos. 414 and 415. Argued March 7, 1929. Decided April 15, 1929. Mr. Harry McCall, with whom Messrs. A. M. Warren, George Denegre, Victor Leovy, He
Johnson v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.
No. 220. Johnson v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation. Argued February 21, 1929. Restored to Docket April 8, 1929. Mr. Myron Scott, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Messrs. Silas B. Axtell and Charle
New York Central Railroad v. Johnson
NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. EDWARD H. JOHNSON. SAME v. MYRTLE J. JOHNSON. Nos. 455 and 456. Argued March 8, 1929. Decided April 8, 1929. Messrs. Sidney C. Murray and Albert S. Marley, with whom Mr. Marvin A. Jersild was on the brie
Compañia General de Tabacos de Filipinas v. Collector of Internal Revenue
COMPAÑIA GENERAL de TABACOS de FILIPINAS v. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE. No. 335. Argued March 1, 1929. Decided April 8, 1929. Mf. Lawrence H. Cake, with whom Messrs. Francis W. Clements, Clyde A. Dewitt, Eugene A. Perkins, and- Wm. C. Br
Grayson v. Harris
GRAYSON et al. v. HARRIS et al. No. 116. Argued January 10, 1929. Decided April 8, 1929. Mr. Streeter B. Flynn, with whom Messrs. Robert M. Rainey, William Neff, Louis E. Neff, Jess W. Watts, and Calvin Jones were on the brief, for petition
Sinclair v. United States
SINCLAIR v. UNITED STATES. No. 555. Argued February 18, 19, 1929. Decided April 8, 1929. Messrs. Martin W. Littleton and George P. Hoover for Sinclair. Messrs. Atlee Pomerene and Owen J. Roberts for the United States.
Highland v. Russell Car & Snow Plow Co.
HIGHLAND v. RUSSELL CAR & SNOW PLOW COMPANY. No. 8. Argued February 23, 24, 1929. Decided April 8, 1929. Mr. Ira Jewell Williams, with whom Messrs. Ira Jewell Williams, Jr., Lisle D. McCall, and Fronds Skunk Brown were on the brief, for pet
Helson & Randolph v. Kentucky
HELSON and RANDOLPH, CO-PARTNERS, v. KENTUCKY. No. 296. Argued February 27, 28, 1929. Decided April 8, 1929. Mr. James G. Wheeler, with whom Messrs. Charles K. Wheeler and D. H. Hughes were on the brief, for plaintiffs in error. Mr. James M
Karnuth v. United States ex rel. Albro
KARNUTH, DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION, et al. v. UNITED STATES ex rel. ALBRO. No. 198. Argued March 5, 1929. Decided April 8, 1929. Attorney General Mitchell, with whom Messrs. Green H. Hackworth, Solicitor, Department of State, Richard ■ W. Flo
Alabama v. United States
ALABAMA et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 166. Argued February 21, 1929. Decided April 8, 1929. Mr. Edgar Watkins, with whom Messrs. Charlie C. McCall, Attorney General of Alabama,' J. Q. Smith, Spe- . cial Assistant Attorney General, and
Riehle v. Margolies
RIEHLE, RECEIVER, v. MARGOLIES. No. 347 Argued March 1, 5, 1929. Decided April 8, 1929. Mr. F. Wright Moxley, with whom Mr. Harry F. White was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Sol A. Rosenblatt, with whom Mr. NatU'an Burkan was on the brie
Pampanga Sugar Mills v. Trinidad
PAMPANGA SUGAR MILLS v. TRINIDAD. No. 325. Argued March 1, 1929. Decided April 8, 1929. ' Mr: Louis Titus, with whom Messrs Quintín Paredes, Felipe Buencamino, Jr., Oscar Sutro, and José Yulo were on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Wm. Cattr
Gilchrist v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.
GILCHRIST et al., CONSTITUTING THE TRANSIT COMMISSION, et al. v. INTERBOROUGH RAPID TRANSIT COMPANY et al. No. 159. Argued October 16, 17, 18, 1928. Reargued January 14, 15, 16, 1929. Decided April 8, 1929. Mr. Irwin Untermyer with whom Mes
United States Printing & Lithograph Co. v. Griggs, Cooper & Co.
UNITED STATES PRINTING & LITHOGRAPH COMPANY v. GRIGGS, COOPER & COMPANY. No. 372. Argued March 6, 1929. Decided April 8, 1929. Mr. Walter F. Murray, with whom Mr. Frank F. Dins-more was on the brief, for petitioner. Messrs. E. Howard Morphy
Ithaca Trust Co. v. United States
ITHACA TRUST COMPANY, EXECUTOR AND TRUSTEE, v. UNITED STATES. No. 267. Argued February 27, 1929. Decided April 8, 1929. Mr. A. F. Prescott, Jr., with whom Messrs. Simon Lyon and R. B. H. Lyon were on the brief, for petitioner. Solicitor Gen
Alberto v. Nicolas
ALBERTO v. NICOLAS. No. 364. Argued March 6, 1929. Decided April 8, 1929. Mr. Wm. Cattron Rigby, with whom Messrs. John A.. Hull, Judge Advocate General, IT. S. A., and Delfín Jaranilla, Attorney General of the Philippine Islands, were on t
Sutter Butte Canal Co. v. Railroad Commission
SUTTER BUTTE CANAL COMPANY v. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA. No. 403. Argued March 6, 7, 1929. Decided April 8, 1929. Mr. Isaac Frohman, with whom Mr. Douglas Brook-man was on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Messrs. Arthur T. George
London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
LONDON GUARANTEE & ACCIDENT COMPANY, LTD., v. INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA ET AL. No. 491. Argued March 7, 1929. Decided April 8, 1929. Mr. Leo C. Weiler, with whom Messrs. Wm. E. Lowther and Max Ash were on the brief, for a
Carson Petroleum Co. v. Vial, Sheriff & Tax Collector
CARSON PETROLEUM COMPANY v. VIAL, SHERIFF AND TAX COLLECTOR, et al. No. 306. Argued February 28, 1929. Decided April 8, 1929. Messrs. George M. Burditt and John K. Murphy, with whom Messrs. Wm. E. Leahy, Harry A. Newby, and Harold A. Moise
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.