Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1944 Cases
404 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Innis v. United Mercantile Agencies, Inc.
No. 832. Innis v. United Mercantile Agencies, Inc. May 1, 1944. Messrs. Earl B. Barnes and Alan W. Boyd for petitioner. Mr. Henry I. Oreen for respondent.
City of Milwaukee v. United States
No. 816. City of Milwaukee et al. v. United States et al. May 1, 1944. Messrs. Walter J. Mattison, Omar T. McMahon, Oliver L. O’Boyle, and C. Stanley Perry for petitioners. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Littell, and Mes
Garlington v. Wasson
No. 798. Garlington et al. v. Wasson. May 1, 1944. Mr. Elmer McClain for petitioners.
Patterson v. Sanford
No. —. No. —■. No. —. Ex parte Samuel Jackson; Ex parte Percy Arthur Whistler; and Patterson v. Sanford, Warden. May 1, 1944.
United States v. County of Allegheny
UNITED STATES et al. v. COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY. No. 417. Argued March 1, 1944. Decided May 1, 1944. Solicitor General Fahy, with whom Assistant Attorney General Samuel 0. Clark, Jr., Judge Advocate General Cramer, and Messrs. Sewall Key, J. Lo
Ashcraft v. Tennessee
ASHCRAFT et al. v. TENNESSEE. No. 391. Argued February 28, 1944. Decided May 1, 1944. Messrs. James F. Bickers and Grover N. McCormick for petitioners. Mr. Nat Tipton, with whom Mr. Roy H. Beeler, Attorney General of Tennessee, was on the b
Allen Calculators, Inc. v. National Cash Register Co.
ALLEN CALCULATORS, INC. v. NATIONAL CASH REGISTER CO. et al. No. 592. Argued March 28, 1944. Decided May 1, 1944. Mr. Murray Seasongood, with whom Mr. Frank R. Bruce was on the brief, for appellant. Mr. Hugh McD. Ritchey, with whom Messrs.
United States v. Marshall Transport Co.
UNITED STATES et al. v. MARSHALL TRANSPORT CO. et al. No. 589. Argued March 28, 1944. Decided May 1, 1944. Mr. Daniel H. Kunkel, with whom Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Berge, and Messrs. Robert L. Pierce, Walter J. Cum
City of Los Angeles v. Natural Soda Products Co.
No. 723. City of Los Angeles et al. v. Natural Soda Products Co. April 24, 1944.
Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.
No. 232. Sartor et al. v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp. April 24, 1944.
Hodge v. Huff
No. 801. Hodge v. Huff. April 24, 1944. Mr. Roger Robb for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Tom C. Clark, Mr. Robert S. Erdahl, and Miss Beatrice Rosenberg for respondent.
Smith v. Ragen
No. 837. Smith v. Ragen, Warden. April 24, 1944.
Winston v. Courtney
No. 786. Winston v. Courtney, State’s Attorney, et al. April 24, 1944. Messrs. Weightstill Woods and Urban A. Lavery for petitioner. Messrs. Thomas J. Courtney and Francis S. Clamitz for respondents.
Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Madden Furniture, Inc.
No. 799. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Madden Furniture, Inc. et al. April 24, 1944. Messrs. Peter 0. Knight, C. Fred Thompson, and John Bell for petitioner. Mr. O. K. Bernes for respondents.
Reichert v. Federal Land Bank
No. 808. Reichert v. Federal Land Bank of St. Paul. April 24, 1944. Messrs. Elmer McClain and William Lemke for petitioner. Mr. Robert J. Barry for respondent.
Eells v. Hall
No. 796. Eells v. Hall. April 24, 1944.
United States ex rel. Potts v. Rabb
No. 763. United States ex rel. Potts v. Rabb, U. S. Marshal. April 24, 1944. Mr. Walter Biddle Saul for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Tom C. Clark, and Messrs. Robert S. Erdahl and Shelby Fitze for responden
Valentine-Clark Corp. v. Commissioner
No. 644. Valentine-Clark Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. April 24, 1944. Mr. ITayner N. Larson for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Samuel 0. Clark, Jr., Mr. Sewall Key, and Misses Helen R. Car
Ex parte Gobin
No. —. No. —. Ex parte Oliver Gobin; and Ex parte Noel Gaines. April 24, 1944.
National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. HEARST PUBLICATIONS, INC. NO. 336. Argued February 8, 9, 1944. Decided April 24, 1944. Mr. Alvin J. Rockwell, with whom Solicitor General Fahy, Messrs. Robert L. Stern and Frank Donner, and Miss Ruth Weyand
Clifford F. MacEvoy Co. v. United States ex rel. Calvin Tomkins Co.
CLIFFORD F. MacEVOY CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES for the use and benifit of CALVIN TOMKINS CO. No. 483. Argued March 7, 1944. Decided April 24, 1944. Mr. Edward F. Clark, with whom Messrs. Elmer 0. Goodwin and John A. Shorten were on the bri
United States v. American Surety Co.
UNITED STATES v. AMERICAN SURETY CO. No. 381. Argued March 27, 28, 1944. Decided April 24, 1944. Mr. Robert L. Stern, with whom Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Shea, and Messrs. W. Marvin Smith and Hubert H. Margolies wer
United States v. Ballard
UNITED STATES v. BALLARD et al. No. 472. Argued March 3, 6, 1944. Decided April 24, 1944. Solicitor General Fahy, with whom Assistant Attorney General Tom C. Clark, Mr. Robert S. Erdahl, and Miss Beatrice Rosenberg were on the brief, for th
Southern Railway Co. v. United States
SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. v. UNITED STATES. No. 578. Argued March 28, 29, 1944. Decided April 24, 1944. Mr. Sidney S. Alderman, with whom Messrs. Seddon G. Boxley and S. B. Prince were on the brief, for petitioner. Assistant Attorney General She
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.