Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1944 Cases
404 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United States v. Mitchell
UNITED STATES v. MITCHELL. Nos. 514 and 515. Argued March 27, 1944. Decided April 24, 1944. Solicitor General Fahy, with whom Assistant Attorney General Tom C. Clark, and Messrs. Robert S. Erdahl, Paul A. Freund, and Jesse Climenko were on
Great Northern Life Insurance Co. v. Read
GREAT NORTHERN LIFE INSURANCE CO. v. READ, INSURANCE COMMISSIONER. No. 235. Argued January 31, 1944. Decided April 24, 1944. Messrs. Charles R. Holton and John A. Johnson, with whom Mr. Herbert R. Tews was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr.
Anaconda v. American Sugar Refining Co.
THE ANACONDA et al. v. AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING CO. No. 649. Argued March 29, 1944. Decided April 24, 1944. Mr. Cody Fowler for petitioners. Mr. Henry N. Longley, with whom Mr. John W. R. Zisgen was on the brief, for respondent.
Pollock v. Williams
POLLOCK v. WILLIAMS, SHERIFF. No. 345. Argued February 10, 1944. Decided April 10, 1944. Mr. Raymer F. Maguire, with whom Messrs. W. H. Poe and Thomas T. Purdom were on the brief, for appellant. Mr. John C. Wynn, Assistant Attorney General
Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. v. United States
CHICAGO, ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS & OMAHA RAILWAY CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 482. Argued March 8, 1944. Decided April 10, 1944. Mr. Amos M. Mathews, with whom Mr. Warren New-come was on the brief, for appellants. Mr. Nelson Thomas,
Bozel v. United States
No. 694. Bozel v. United States. April 10, 1944. Emmet H. Bozel, pro se. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Tom C. Clark, and Mr. Robert S. Erdahl for the United States.
Capetola v. Barclay White Co.
No. 805. Capetola et al. v. Barclay White Co. April 10, 1944. Mr. John J. McDevitt, Jr. for petitioners.
Fenton v. Walling
No. 764. No. 765. Fenton v. Walling, Administrator; and Smith v. Walling, Administrator. April 10, 1944. Messrs. Louis Ferrari, G. D. Schilling, and Philip S. Ehrlich for petitioners. Solicitor General Fahy, Messrs. Douglas B. Maggs and Jos
Hargrove v. United States
No. 736. Hargrove v. United States. April 10, 1944. Messrs. Leo Brewer and Warren 0. Coleman for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy and Mr. Robert S. Erdahl for the United States.
Hooven & Allison Co. v. Evatt
No. 781. Hooven & Allison Co. v. Evatt, Tax Commissioner. April 10, 1944. Messrs. Luther Day and Thomas C. Lavery for petitioner. Mr. Thomas J. Herbert, Attorney General of Ohio, for respondent.
United States v. Blair ex rel. Roanoke Marble & Granite Co.
UNITED STATES v. BLAIR, individually and to the use of ROANOKE MARBLE & GRANITE CO., INC. No. 75. Argued February 1, 1944. Decided April 10, 1944. Assistant Attorney General Shea, with whom Solicitor General Fahy and Messrs. Valentine Brook
United States v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.
UNITED STATES v. BAUSCH & LOMB OPTICAL CO. ET AL. NO. 62. Argued December 8, 1943. Decided April 10, 1944. Assistant Attorney General Berge, with whom Solicitor General Fahy and Mr. Charles H. Weston were on the brief, for the United States
Franks Bros. v. National Labor Relations Board
FRANKS BROS. CO. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD. No. 521. Argued March 2, 27, 1944. Decided April 10, 1944. Mr. Benjamin E. Gordon, with whom Mr. Arthur V. Getchell was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Alvin J. Rockwell, with whom Solic
Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
MEDO PHOTO SUPPLY CORP. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD. No. 265. Argued March 2, 1944. Decided April 10, 1944. Mr. William, E. Friedman, with whom Mr. Walter N. Seligsberg was on the brief, for petitioner. Miss Ruth Weyand, with whom Sol
Walling v. James V. Reuter, Inc.
WALLING, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, v. JAMES V. REUTER, INC. No. 436. Argued March 10, 1944. Decided April 10, 1944. Mr. Douglas B. Maggs, with whom Solicitor General Fahy, Mr. Robert L. Stern, a
Depaoli v. United States
No. 743. Depaoli et ux. v. United States. April 3, 1944. Mr. William M. Kearney for petitioners. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Littell, and Messrs. Chester T. Lane, Norman MacDonald, and John C. Harrington for the Unite
Board of County Commissioners v. United States
Nos. 721 and 722. Board of County Commissioners of Pawnee County et al. v. United States. April 3, 1944. Mr. Randell S. Cobb, Attorney General of Oklahoma, for petitioners. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Lit-tell, and Me
Smith v. Davis
No. 680. Smith et al., Partners, v. Davis et al., as Board of County Tax Assessors, et al. April 3, 1944. Messrs. Blair Foster, Philip H. Alston, and Wm. Hart Sibley for petitioners.
Betz v. United States
No. —. Betz v. United States. April 3, 1944.
Hudson & Manhattan Railroad v. Jersey City
No. 766. Hudson & Manhattan Railroad Co. v. Jersey City et al. April 3, 1944. Mr. John F. Finerty for appellant. Solicitor General Fahy and Messrs. Richard H. Field and Harry R. Booth for Fred M. Vinson, Stabilization Director, and Messrs.
Smith v. Allwright
SMITH v. ALLWRIGHT, ELECTION JUDGE, et al. No. 51. Argued November 10, 12, 1943. Reargued January 12, 1944. Decided April 3, 1944. Messrs. Thurgood Marshall and William H. Hastie, with whom Messrs. Leon A. Ransom, Carter Wesley, W. J. Durha
Cornell Steamboat Co. v. United States
CORNELL STEAMBOAT CO. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 384. Argued March 1, 2, 1944. Decided April 3, 1944. Mr. Robert S. Erskine for appellant. Mr. Robert L. Pierce, with whom Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Berge, and Messrs
Boston Tow Boat Co. v. United States
BOSTON TOW BOAT CO. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 385. Argued March 1, 2, 1944. Decided April 3, 1944. Mr. Charles S. Bolster, with whom Mr. Albert T. Gould was on the brief, for appellant. Mr. Robert L. Pierce, with whom Solicitor General Fa
Viereck v. United States
No. 695. Viereck v. United States. March 27, 1944. Messrs. Leo A. Rover and John J. Wilson for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Tom C. Clark, and Messrs. George A. McNulty and Albert E. Arent for the United Sta
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.