Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1949 Cases
383 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Bundte v. California
No. 662. Bundte et al. v. California. District Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, of California. George E. Flood for petitioners. Fred N. Howser, Attorney General of California,'Walter Rountree and Doris H. Maier, Deputy Attorneys G
Savorgnan v. United States
No. 709. Savorgnan v. United States et al. C. A. 7th Cir. Suel 0. Arnold for petitioner. Solicitor ■ General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Campbell, Oscar H. Davis, Robert S. Erdahl and Israel Convisser for respondents. Wálbridge S. T
In re Abernathy
No. 585, Misc. In re Abernathy.
Kilpatrick v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.
Miscellaneous Orders. No. 275. No. 276. No. 119, Misc. No. 120, Misc. Kilpatrick v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.; Parker v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.; Ex parte Kilpatrick; and Ex parte Parker. William H. DeParcq for petitioners. John M. Sc
National Labor Relations Board v. Crompton-Highland Mills, Inc.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. CROMPTON-HIGHLAND MILLS, INC. No. 197. Argued January 31, 1949. Decided May 31, 1949. David P. Findling argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, Ruth Weyand and
United States v. Penn Foundry & Manufacturing Co.
UNITED STATES v. PENN FOUNDRY & MANUFACTURING CO., INC. No. 253. Argued January 7, 10, 1949. Decided May 31, 1949. Melvin Richter argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorn
Urie v. Thompson
URIE v. THOMPSON, TRUSTEE. No. 129. Argued January 3, 1949. Decided May 31, 1949. Guy W. Green argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Louis N. Wolf. Lyman 3. Bishop argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief
Empresa Siderurgica, S. A. v. County of Merced
EMPRESA SIDERURGICA, S. A., et al. v. COUNTY OF MERCED et al. No. 327. Argued February 9, 1949. Decided May 31, 1949. Scott D. Kellogg argued the cause and filed a brief for appellants. James E. Sabine, Deputy Attorney General of California
Smith v. United States
SMITH v. UNITED STATES. No. 292. Argued March 4, 7, 1949. Decided May 31, 1949. Walter R. Hart argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Julian C. Tepper; Harold D. Cohen argued the causef’fbr the United States. With' him o
Hynes, Regional Director, Fish & Wildlife Service v. Grimes Packing Co.
HYNES, REGIONAL DIRECTOR, FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, v. GRIMES PACKING CO. et al. No. 24. Argued October 21, 1948. Decided May 31, 1949. Roger P. Marquis argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief wer
United States v. National City Lines, Inc.
UNITED STATES v. NATIONAL CITY LINES, INC. ET AL. No. 269, Misc. Argued February 8, 1949. Decided May 31, 1949. Charles H. Weston argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were George T. Washing ton, Acting Solicitor Gen
Kilpatrick v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.
KILPATRICK v. TEXAS & PACIFIC RAILWAY CO. No. 233, Misc. Argued February 8, 1949. Decided May 31, 1949. William H. DeParcq argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Gerald F. Finley and Arnold B. Elkind. Porter B. Chandler
Ex parte Collett
EX PARTE COLLETT. No. 206, Misc. Argued February 7, 1949. Decided May 31, 1949. Lloyd T. Bailey argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Theodore Granik. Robert P. Hobson argued the cause for the Honorable Fred L. Wham, Un
Eagle v. Cherney
Rehearing Denied. No. 406, Misc. Eagle v. Cherney et al., 336 U. S. 928.
Reeves v. Ragen
No. 567, Misc. Reeves v. Ragen, Warden. Circuit Court of Iroquois County, Illinois.
Martinez v. California
No. 454, Misc. Martinez v. California. District Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, of California. Elizabeth Cassidy for petitioner.
Updike v. West
No. 714. Updike et al., doing business as Updike Awning Co., v. West et al. C. A. 10th Cir. Glenn 0. Young for petitioners. Frank Settle and E. 0. Monnet for West et al., respondents.
Scocozza v. Erie Railroad
No. 673. Scocozza et al. v. Erie Railroad Co. C. A. 2d Cir. William J. Dempsey for petitioners. Theodore• Kiendl, Edward J. McGratty, Jr. and Cleveland C. Cory for respondent.
Reilly v. Pinkus
Certiorari Granted. (See also No. 500, ante, p. 38, and No. 670, supra.) No. 583. Reilly, Postmaster, v. Pinkus, trading as American Health Aids Co., also known as Energy Food Center. C. A. 3d Cir. Solicitor General Perlman for petitioner.
Cassell v. Texas
No. 692. Cassell v. Texas.
In re Federal Security Administrator & Attorney General
No. 597, Misc. In re Federal Security Administrator and the Attorney General of the United States. Robert L. Stern argued the cause for petitioners, and Solicitor General Perlman was on the petition. Walter M. Bastían argued the cause and w
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Philadelphia Co.
May 16, 1949. Per Curiam Decisions. No. 670. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Philadelphia Company. Solicitor General Perlman and Roger S. Foster for petitioner. Thomas J. Munsch, Jr. for respondent.
Brooks v. United States
BROOKS v. UNITED STATES. NO. 388. Argued March 2, 1949. Decided May 16, 1949. Whitejord' S. Blakeney argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioners. ■ Paul A. Sweeney argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were So
Union National Bank v. Lamb
UNION NATIONAL BANK v. LAMB. No. 500. Argued March 31, 1949. Decided May 16, 1949. Maurice J. O’Sullivan argued the cause and tiled a brief for appellant; Daniel L. Brenner submitted on brief for appellee.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.