Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1949 Cases
383 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Mahoney v. Michigan
Certiorari Denied. (See also No. 614, Misc., supra.) No. 685. Mahoney v. Michigan. Supreme Court of Michigan. William G. Fitzpatrick for petitioner. Stephen J. Roth, Attorney General' of Michigan, and Edmund E. Shepherd,, Solicitor General,
Shotkin v. Denver Publishing Co.
No. 598, Misc. No. 615, Misc. Shotkin et al. v. Denver Publishing Co. et al.; and Smith v. Witsell.
United States v. Gerlach Live Stock Co.
No. 299. No. 300. No. 301. No. 302. No, 303. No. 304. United States v. Gerlach Live Stock Co.; United States v. Potter; United States v. Erreca; United States v. James J. Stevinson (a corporation); United States v. Stevinson; and United Sta
Commissioner v. Wodehouse
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. WODEHOUSE. No. 84. Argued December 10, 13, 1948. Decided June 13, 1949. . 'Melva M. Graney argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney ■ Gener
United States v. Wittek
UNITED STATES v. WITTEK. No. 473. Argued April 20-21, 1949. Decided June 13, 1949. Assistant Attorney General Vanech argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, Philip Elman, Roger P. Marqui
United States v. Cors
UNITED STATES v. CORS. No. 132. Argued February 4, 1949. Decided June 13, 1949. Oscar H. Davis argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Morison, Paul A. Sweeney
Standard Oil Co. of California v. United States
STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 279. Argued March 3-4, 1949. Decided June 13, 1949. John M. Hall argued the cause for appellants. With him off the brief was Marshall P. Madison. Assistant Attorney General Ber
Joy Oil Co. v. State Tax Commission
JOY OIL CO., LTD. v. STATE TAX COMMISSION. No. 223. Argued January 6-7, 1949. — Decided June 13, 1949. Clayton F. Jennings argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Edmund E. Shepherd, Solicitor General of Michigan, argued the caus
Binkowski v. Ragen
No. 593, Misc. Binkowski v. Ragen, Warden. Criminal Court of Cook County, Illinois.
Grayson Shops, Inc. v. Stone
No. 765. Grayson Shops, Inc. v. Stone. C. A. 2d Cir. David Mackay for petitioner. Thomas A. Gaffney for respondent.
Todorow v. United States
No. 727. Todorow et al. v. United States. C. A. 9th Cir. Morris Lavine for petitioners. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Campbell, Robert S. Erdahl and Harold D. Cohen for the United States.
Commissioner v. Connelly
No. 744. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Connelly et ux. United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Sblicitor General Perlman for petitioner. Caesar L. Aiello and A. Murray Preston for respondents.
Mezick v. Wright
No. 570, Misc. No. 602, Misc. No. 604, Misc. No. 617, Misc. Mezick v. Wright, Warden Volkmann v. Ragen, Warden; Hall v. Ragen, Warden; and Foley v. Ragen, Warden.
Federal Communications Commission v. WJR, Goodwill Station, Inc.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION v. WJR, THE GOODWILL STATION, INC. et al. No. 495. Argued April 22, 1949. Decided June 6, 1949. . Solicitor General Perlman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Stanley M. Silver-berg
City of Morgantown v. Royal Insurance
CITY OF MORGANTOWN v. ROYAL INSURANCE CO., LTD. No. 396. Argued February 9, 1949. Decided June 6, 1949. Mary Frances Brown argued the cause, and W. G. Sfathers filed a brief, for petitioner. James M. Guiher argued the cause for respondent.
Williams v. New York
WILLIAMS v. NEW YORK. No. 671. Argued April 21, 1949. Decided June 6, 1949. John F. Finerty argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Edward H. Levine. . Solomon A. Klein argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brie
Young v. Ragen
YOUNG v. RAGEN, WARDEN. No. 50. Argued November 17, 1948. Decided June 6, 1949. Edward’ H. Levi argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner in No. 50. William C. Wines, Assistant Attorney General of Illinois, argued the cause for resp
McGee v. Mississippi
June 2, 1949. Miscellaneous Order. No. 655, Misc. McGee v. Mississippi.
California v. Zook
No. 355. California v. Zook et al., 336 U. S. 725.
Gann v. Hiatt
No. 338, Misc. Gann v. Hiatt, Warden. C. A. 5th Cir. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Campbell, Robert S. Erdahl and Harold D. Cohen for respondent.
Denny v. United States
No. 738. Denny et ux. v. United States. C. A. 5th Cir. Michael J. Kaine, Jr. and Warren E. Miller for petitioners. Solicitor General Perlman; Assistant Attorney General Morison, Paul A. Sweeney and Morton Hollander for the United States.
Francis v. United States
No. 721. Francis v. United States. C. A. 7th Cir. George D. Reilly for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman for the United States. '
Glover v. Maloney
No. 710. Glover et al., Trustees, v. Maloney, Collector of Internal Revenue. C. A. 9th Cir. Carl E. Davidson for petitioners. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Caudle, Ellis N. Slack, Lee A. Jackson and Mélva M. Graney f
Braun v. Taub
No. 699. Braun v. Taub et al. C. A. 2d Cir. David Haar for petitioner. Joseph M. Schwartz for respondents.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.