Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1949 Cases
383 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Wong Yang Sung v. Clark
No. 154. Wong Yang Sung v. Clark, Attorney General, et al. Jack Wasserman, Gaspare Cusumano and Thomas M. Cooley, II, for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman for respondents.
Dickinson v. Petroleum Conversion Corp.
No. 150. Dickinson v. Petroleum Conversion Corp.
O'Neill v. Robinson
No. 56, Misc. O’Neill v. Robinson, Warden.
Weber v. Ragen
No. 100, Misc. Weber v. Ragen, Warden. Petitioner pro se. Ivan A. Elliott, Attorney General of Illinois, and William C. Wines, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Secretary of Agriculture v. Central Roig Refining Co.
No. 27. No. 30. No. 32. Secretary of Agriculture v. Central Roig Refining Co. et al.; Porto Rican American Sugar Refinery, Inc. v. Central Roig Refining Co. et al.; and Government of Puerto Rico v. Secretary of Agriculture et al.
United States v. Louisiana
No. 12, Original. No. 13, Original. United States v. Louisiana; and United States v. Texas.
Bingaman v. Rehn
No. 250. Bingaman, Administrator, v. Rehn et al., doing business as John P. Mainelli Construction Co. C. Dell Floyd for appellant. Edward K. McDermott for Rehn, appellee.
McGee v. Mississippi
No. 238. McGee v. Mississippi. Arthur G. Silverman for appellant-petitioner. Greek L. Rice, Attorney General of Mississippi, and George H. Ethridge, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee-respondent.
Partmar Corp. v. United States
No. 175. Partmar Corporation v. United States et al. Russell Hardy for appellant. Solicitor General Perlman for the United States; and Albert C. Bickford, Louis Phillips and George G. Gallantz for Paramount Pictures, Inc. et al., appellees.
Beeman v. Michigan Board of Pharmacy
No. 134. Beeman et al. v. Michigan Board of Pharmacy et al. Raymond K. Dykema for appellants. Stephen J. Roth, Attorney General of Michigan, Edmund E. Shepherd, Solicitor General, Ernest O. Zirkalos and Daniel J. O’Hara, Assistant Attorneys
Adirondack Transit Lines, Inc. v. Hudson Transit Lines, Inc.
No. 104. No. 105. Adirondack Transit Lines, Inc. v. Hudson Transit Lines, Inc.; and United States et al. v. Hudson Transit Lines, Inc. Martin J. Kelly, Jr. for appellant in No. 104. Solicitor General Perlman and Daniel W. Knowlton for appel
Telefilm, Inc. v. Superior Court
No. 72. Telefilm, Inc. v. Superior Court of California, in and for the County of Los Angeles, et al. September 16, 1949. Joseph L. Lewinson for petitioner. Harold W. Kennedy and Eugene D. Williams for respondents.
Eisler v. United States
EISLER v. UNITED STATES. No. 255. Argued March 28, 1949. Decided June 27, 1949. David Rein and Abraham J. Isserman argued the cause for petitioner. With them on the brief were Carol King and Joseph Forer. Solicitor General Perlman argued th
Brinegar v. United States
BRINEGAR v. UNITED STATES. No. 12. Argued October 18-19, 1948. Decided June 27, 1949. Irving E. Ungerman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Leslie L. Conner. Stanley M. Silverberg argued the cause for the United Stat
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Central-Illinois Securities Corp.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. CENTRAL-ILLINOIS SECURITIES CORP. et al. NO. 226. Argued January 12-13, 1949. Decided June 27, 1949. Roger S. Foster argued the cause for the Securities & Exchange Commission. With him on the brief were
Christoffel v. United States
CHRISTOFFEL v. UNITED STATES. No. 528. Argued April 20, 1949. Decided June 27, 1949. O. John Rogge argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Assistant Attorney General Campbell argued the cause for the United States. With him on th
Lustig v. United States
LUSTIG v. UNITED STATES. No. 1389, Oct. Term, 1946. Argued April 19, 1948. — Reargued October 19, 1948. Decided June 27, 1949. Edward Halle argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman argued the cause for
Harris v. South Carolina
HARRIS v. SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 76. Argued November 16, 1948. Decided June 27, 1949. Julian B. Salley, Jr. and Leonard A. Williamson argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. B. D. Carter argued the cause for respondent. With him on
Turner v. Pennsylvania
TURNER v. PENNSYLVANIA. No. 107. Argued November 16-17, 1948. Decided June 27, 1949. Edwin P. Rome argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Clinton Budd Palmer. Colbert C. McClain argued the cause for respondent. With him
Watts v. Indiana
WATTS v. INDIANA. No. 610. Argued April 25, 1949. Decided June 27, 1949. Franklin H. Williams and Thurgood Marshall argued the cause for petitioner. With them on the brief were Robert L. Carter and Henry J. Richardson. Frank E. Coughlin, De
Wolf v. Colorado
WOLF v. COLORADO. Nos. 17 and 18. Argued October 19, 1948. Decided June 27, 1949. Philip Hornbein argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Philip Hornbein, Jr. and Donald M. Shere. James S. Henderson, Assistant Attorney G
Kimball Laundry Co. v. United States
KIMBALL LAUNDRY CO. v. UNITED STATES. No. 63. Argued December 7-8, 1948. Decided June 27, 1949. William J. Hotz argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were William J. Hotz, Jr. and William F. Dalton. Assistant Solicitor Gene
Doles v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
No. 805. Doles v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 337. U. S. 922.
Holderfield v. Ragen
No. 690, Misc. Holderfield v. Ragen, Warden. Circuit Court of Franklin County, Illinois.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.