Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1949 Cases
383 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Thomas v. Furness (pacific) Ltd.
No. 634, Misc. Thomas v. Furness (Pacific) Limited et al. C. A. 9th Cir. Herbert Resner for petitioner. Farnham P. Griffiths for respondents.
Empire Packing Co. v. United States
No. 860. Empire Packing Co. et al. v. United States. C. A. 7th Cir. Michael F. Mulcahy and Henry W. Dieringer for petitioners. Solicitor General Perlman for the United States.
Graylyn Bainbridge Corp. v. Woods
No. 799. Graylyn Bainbridge Corp. v. Woods, Housing Expediter. C. A. 8th Cir. William G. Boatright for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, John R. Benney, Ed Dupree, Hugo V. Prucha and Nathan Siegel for respondent.
Polizio v. New York
No. 675. Polizio v. New York. Court of Appeals of New York. Edward H..Levine for petitioner. Howard R. Lonergan for respondent.
Fong v. Superior Court of Washington for King County
Certiorari Denied. No. 71. Fong et al. v. Superior Court of Washington for King County et al. Supreme Court of Washington. John J. Kennett for petitioners.
Sinclair v. United States
No. 783. Sinclair v. United States. C. A. 3d Cir. David Berger for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Campbell, Robert S. Erdahl and Israel Convisser for the United States.
Dennis v. United States
Certiorari Granted. (See also Nos. 43, 386 and 443, supra.) No. 436. Dennis v. United States. United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit Earl Dickerson and Harry Sacher for petitioner. Solicitor' General Perlman, Ro
Clark v. Manufacturers Trust Co.
No. 386. No. 443. Clark, Attorney General, as Successor to the Alien Property Custodian, v. Manufacturers Trust Co.; and Manufacturers Trust Co. v. Clark, Attorney General, as Successor to the Alien Property Custodian. Solicitor General Per
Great Lakes Steel Corp. v. United States
No. 749. Great Lakes Steel Corp. v. United States et al. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. Sherwin A. Hill, Edward T. Goodrich, James McEvoy, Jr. and Harry D. Fenske for appellant. Solicitor
Central States Cooperatives, Inc. v. Watson Bros. Transportation Co.
June 27, 1949. Per Curiam Decisions. No. 43. Central States Cooperatives, Inc. v. Watson Bros. Transportation Co., Inc. On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Thomas G. McBride and
Fink v. Shepard Steamship Co.
FINK v. SHEPARD STEAMSHIP CO. NO. 360. Argued February 2, 1949. Decided June 27, 1949. James Landye argued the cause for petitioner in No. 360. With him on the brief were B. A. Green and Edwin D. Hicks. Abraham E.. Freedman argued the cause
Weade v. Dichmann, Wright & Pugh, Inc.
WEADE et al. v. DICHMANN, WRIGHT & PUGH, INC. No. 179. Argued February 1, 1949. Decided June 27, 1949. William E. Leahy argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Michael F. Keogh, J. Robert Carey, Richard H. Love,.Edward
Cosmopolitan Shipping Co. v. McAllister
COSMOPOLITAN SHIPPING CO. v. McALLISTER. No. 351. Argued February 1-2, 1949. Decided June 27, 1949. Leavenworth Colby argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Morison,
Gibbs v. Burke
GIBBS v. BURKE, WARDEN. No. 418. Argued April 21-22, 1949. Decided June 27, 1949. Frederick Bernays Wiener, acting under an assignment by the Court, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Alvin 0. West. Karl W. Johnson a
Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. McComb
FARMERS RESERVOIR & IRRIGATION CO. v. McCOMB, WAGE & HOUR ADMINISTRATOR. NO. 128. Argued December 16, 1948. Decided June 27, 1949. Frank N. Bancroft and John P. Akolt argued the cause for the company. With them on the brief was Walter W. Bl
Commissioner v. Culbertson
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. CULBERTSON et ux. No. 313. Argued February 7, 1949. Decided June 27, 1949. Arnold Raum argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Cau
Larson v. Domestic & Foreign Commerce Corp.
LARSON, WAR ASSETS ADMINISTRATOR AND SURPLUS PROPERTY ADMINISTRATOR, v. DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN COMMERCE CORP. No. 31. Argued November 12, 1948. Decided June 27, 1949. Assistant Attorney General Morison argued the cause for petitioner. With hi
Wilde v. Wyoming
No. 680, Misc. Wilde v. Wyoming. Supreme Court of Wyoming.
Edelman v. California
No. 666, Misc. Edelman v. California. Appellate Department of the Superior Court of California.
Darden v. Ragen
No. 649, Misc. Darden v. Ragen, Warden. Supreme Court of Illinois.
Wallace v. United States
No. 629, Misc. Wallace v. United States. C. A. 8th. Cir. George J. Danforth for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Campbell, Robert S. Erdahl and Philip R Monahan for the United States.
Godwin v. Smyth
No. 599, Misc. Godwin v. Smyth, Superintendent. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia.
Gould v. United States
No. 553, Misc. Gould v. United States. C. A. 10th Cir.
Lowe v. United States
No. 476, Misc. Lowe v. United States. C. A. 2d Cir. Petitioner pro se... Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Campbell, Robert S. Erdahl and Philip R. Monahan for the United States.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.