Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1952 Cases
351 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Erie Forge Co. v. United States
No. 601. Erie Forge Co. v. United States. Leo Brady and W. Pitt Gifford for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Acting Assistant Attorney General Slack, Lee A. Jackson and Irving I. Axelrad for the United States.
Loew's Inc. v. Milgram
No. 653. Loew’s Incorporated et al. v. Milgram et al. Wm. A. Schnader, Bernard G. Segal and Abraham L. Freedman for petitioners. Albert M. Cohen for respondents.
Tishman Realty & Construction Co. v. United States
No. 629. Tishman Realty & Construction Co., Inc. v. United States et al. Eugene Eisenmann for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Underhill, Roger P. Marquis and John C. Harrington for the United States.
Handzik v. Illinois ex rel. Dickerson
No. 604. Handzik v. Illinois ex rel. Dickerson. Frederick J. Bertram for petitioner.
Central Hide & Rendering Co. v. United States
No. 580. Central Hide & Rendering Co. v. United States. E. E. Blakely for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Baldridge and Samuel D. Slade for the United States.
Tate v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California
No. 397, Misc. Tate v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California et al.
On Lee v. United States
No. 543. On Lee v. United States.
Auto Transports, Inc. v. United States
No. 665. Auto Transports, Inc. et al. v. United States et al. James W. Wrape, Glenn M. Elliott and L. Karlton Mosteller for Auto Transports, Inc.; and Henry M. Hogan and Walter R. Frizzell for General Motors Corporation, appellants. Solicit
Richfield Oil Corp. v. United States
No. 395. Richfield Oil Corp. v. United States. Argued April 1-2, 1952. Decided April 21, 1952. Robert E. Paradise argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was William J. DeMartini. Assistant Attorney General Morison argued the
United States v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance
UNITED STATES v. ATLANTIC MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. et al. No. 450. Argued March 7, 1952. Decided April 21, 1952. James L. Morrisson argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney
Von Hardenberg v. McGrath
No. 606. Von Hardenberg et al. v. McGrath, Attorney General. Roland Towle for petitioners. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Baynton, Herman Smith, James D. Hill and George B. Searls for respondent.
Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. West Edmond Hunton Lime Unit
No. 607. W. W. Heard for petitioner. T. Murray Robinson for respondent. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. West Edmond Hunton Lime Unit.
Olin Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
No. 586. Olin Industries, Inc., Winchester Repeating Arms Company Division, v. National Labor Relations Board. Benjamin E. Gordon, Maurice Epstein and Allan Seser-man for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, George J. Bott, David P. Findl
Brunner v. United States
No. 442. Brunner v. United States. Argued April 2, 1952. Decided April 7, 1952. William B. Esterman and A. L. Wirin argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. J. F. Bishop argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brie
Uebersee Finanz-Korporation, A. G. v. McGrath
UEBERSEE FINANZ-KORPORATION, A. G., v. McGRATH, ATTORNEY GENERAL, SUCCESSOR TO THE ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN. No. 178. Argued January 2, 1952. Decided April 7, 1952. Thurman Arnold argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were
Stroble v. California
STROBLE v. CALIFORNIA. No. 373. Argued March 6, 1952. Decided April 7, 1952. John D. Gray and A. L. Wirin argued the cause for petitioner. With them on the brief were Fred Okrand, Clore Warne and Loren Miller. Adolph Alexander argued the ca
United States v. Spector
UNITED STATES v. SPECTOR. No. 443. Argued March 6, 1952. Decided April 7, 1952. Robert L. Stern argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Mclnerney, Beatrice Ros
Kaufman v. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles et Commerciales, S. A.
KAUFMAN et al. v. SOCIETE INTERNATIONALE POUR PARTICIPATIONS INDUSTRIELLES ET COMMERCIALES, S. A., et al. No. 172. Argued January 2, 1952. Decided April 7, 1952. Irving Moskovitz argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were
Ray v. Blair
RAY, CHAIRMAN OF THE STATE DEMOCRATIC EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF ALABAMA, v. BLAIR. No. 649. Argued March 31, 1952. Decided April 3, 1952 Opinions filed April 15, 1952. Marx Leva and Harold M. Cook argued the cause for petitioner. With them on
Ray v. Blair
RAY, CHAIRMAN OF THE STATE DEMOCRATIC EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF ALABAMA, v. BLAIR. No. 649. Argued March 31, 1952. Decided April 3, 1952. Marx Leva and Harold M. Cook argued the cause for petitioner. With them on the brief were James J. May-fi
Fletcher v. Flournoy
No. 140, Misc. Fletcher v. Flournoy et al.
United States ex rel. Jellison v. Warden of the New Jersey State Prison
No. 372, Misc. United States ex rel. Jellison v. Warden of the New Jersey State Prison. Louis Auerbacher, Jr. for petitioner. Richard J. Congleton and C. William Caruso for respondent.
Fairbanks v. Commissioner
No. 592. Fairbanks v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Joseph D. Taylor for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman and Acting Assistant Attorney General Slack for respondent.
Brock v. North Carolina
No. 324, Misc. Brock v. North Carolina. Robert S. Cahoon for petitioner. Harry McMullan, Attorney General of North Carolina, and Ralph Moody, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.