Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1952 Cases
351 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Pizza v. Lyons
No. 760. No. 766. Pizza v. Lyons, Commissioner of Corrections, et al.; and County Transportation Co., Inc. v. New York. Henry K. Chapman for appellant in No. 760. Edward R. Brumley for appellant in No. 766. Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney
Gelling v. Texas
No. 707. Gelling v. Texas. Robert H. Park, Herbert Wechsler, Philip J. O’Brien, Jr. and Sidney Schreiber for appellant. Price Daniel, Attorney General of Texas, and E. Jacobson, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
On Lee v. United States
ON LEE v. UNITED STATES. No. 543. Argued April 24, 1952. Decided June 2, 1952. Gilbert S. Rosenthal argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Henry K. Chapman. Robert S. Erdahl argued the cause for the United States. With h
Kawakita v. United States
KAWAKITA v. UNITED STATES. No. 570. Argued April 2-3, 1952. Decided June 2, 1952. Morris Lavine and A. L. Wirin argued the cause for petitioner. With them on the brief was Fred Okrand. Oscar H. Davis argued the cause for the United States.
Robertson v. United States
ROBERTSON v. UNITED STATES. No. 388. Argued March 31, 1952. Decided June 2, 1952. Samuel E. Blackham argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Clyde D. Sandgren. Marvin E. Frankel argued the cause for the United States. Wit
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer
YOUNGSTOWN SHEET & TUBE CO. et al. v. SAWYER. NO. 744. Argued May 12-13, 1952. Decided June 2, 1952. John W. Davis argued the cause for petitioners in No. 744 and respondents in No. 745. On the brief were Mr. Davis, Nathan L. Miller, John L
United States v. Great Northern Railway Co.
UNITED STATES et al. v. GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY CO. No. 151. Argued January 8-9, 1952. Decided June 2, 1952. Ralph S. Spritzer argued the cause for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellants. With him on the brief w
Thompson v. United States
THOMPSON, TRUSTEE, MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 513. Argued April 23, 1952. Decided June 2, 1952. Toll R. Ware argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were T. T. Railey and Geo. W. Holmes. Samuel R
Freapane v. Illinois
No. 309, Misc. Freapane v. Illinois.
Patent Scaffolding Co. v. Up-Right, Inc.
No. 738. Patent Scaffolding Co., Inc. v. Up-Right, Inc. et al. C. P. Goepel and Stuart N. Updike for petitioner. Oscar A. Mellin and Jack E. Hursh for respondents.
General Armature & Manufacturing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
No. 697. General Armature & Manufacturing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board. Marvin C. Wahl and Blanche Gen-auer Wahl for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, George J. Bott, David P. Findling, Mozart G. Ratner, Dominick L. Manoli and
Weiner v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.
No. 689. Weiner v. Reconstruction Finance Corporation. 1. H. Wachtel for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Baldridge, Paul A. Sweeney and Morton Hollander for respondent.
United States v. Caltex (Philippines), Inc.
No. 610. United States v. Caltex (Philippines), Incorporated et al. Solicitor General Perlman for the United States. Leo T. Kissam and Henry J. Kiernan for Caltex (Philippines), Inc., and Albert R. Connelly and George S. Collins for the She
Stembridge v. Georgia
STEMBRIDGE v. GEORGIA. No. 474. Argued April 22, 1952. Decided May 26, 1952. Petitioner argued the cause and filed a brief pro se. M. H. Blackshear, Jr., Deputy Assistant Attorney General of Georgia, argued the cause for respondent. With hi
Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson
JOSEPH BURSTYN, INC. v. WILSON, COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION OF NEW YORK, et al. No. 522. Argued April 24, 1952. Decided May 26, 1952. Ephraim S. London argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant. Charles A. Brind, Jr. and Wendell P. Bro
Federal Trade Commission v. Ruberoid Co.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. RUBEROID CO. NO. 448. Argued March 31 and April 1, 1952. Decided May 26, 1952. Cyrus Austin argued the cause and filed a brief for the Ruberoid Company. James W. Cassedy argued the cause for the Federal Trade Com
Public Utilities Commission v. Pollak
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al. v. POLLAK et al. NO. 224. Argued March 3, 1952. Decided May 26, 1952. W. Theodore Pierson argued the cause for petitioners in No. 224 and respondents in No. 295. On the brief we
Besser Manufacturing Co. v. United States
BESSER MANUFACTURING CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 230. Argued April 21, 1952. Decided May 26, 1952. Carl R. Henry argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief were William 3. Donovan, Roy W. McDonald, John W. Babcock and Peyto
Johansen v. United States
JOHANSEN v. UNITED STATES. NO. 401. Argued March 4, 1952. Decided May 26, 1952. Louis R. Harolds argued the cause for petitioner in No. 401. With him on the brief was William L. Standard. Abraham E. Freedman argued the cause and filed a bri
Pennsylvania Water & Power Co. v. Federal Power Commission
PENNSYLVANIA WATER & POWER CO. et al. v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION et al. NO. 428. Argued April 3-4, 1952. Decided May 26, 1952. Wilkie Bushby argued the cause for the Pennsylvania Water & Power Co. et al., petitioners in No. 428. With him o
National Labor Relations Board v. American National Insurance
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. AMERICAN NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. No. 126. Argued March 4, 1952. Decided May 26, 1952. Mozart G. Ratner argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, George J. Bott, D
Collins v. Claudy
No. 444, Misc. Collins v. Claudy, Warden.
Ring Construction Corp. v. United States
No. 692. Ring Construction Corp. v. United States. Josiah E. Brill and Robert A. Littleton for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Baldridge and Paul A. Sweeney for the United States.
Leishman v. General Motors Corp.
No. 514. Leishman v. General Motors Corp.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.