Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1952 Cases
351 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Lawrence v. United States
No. 486, Mise. Lawrence v. United States. Albert A. Stern for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Mclnerney and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Hamilton v. United States
No. 422, Mise. Hamilton v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Mclnerney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Edward S. Szukelewicz for the United States.
Goldblatt v. Zamore
No. 814. Goldblatt et al. v. Zamore, Trustee in Bankruptcy, et al. George J. Rudnick for petitioners. Max Schwartz for Zamore, respondent.
Lauchli v. Hartman
No. 739. Lauchli, Trustee, v. Hartman et al. Kenneth Teasdale for petitioner. R. Forder Buckley for respondents.
Ramsey v. United States
No. 705. Ramsey et al., Trustees, v. United States. William Ritche for petitioners. Solicitor General Perlman for the United States.
Mandoli v. Acheson
No. 597. Mandoli v. Acheson, Secretary of State. Jack Wasserman, Gaspare Cusumano and Harry Meisel for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Mclnerney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack filed a memorandum
Tinnin v. Heinze
No. 492, No. 514, Mise. Mise. Tinnin v. Heinze, Warden; and Roberts v. McGee, Director.
New Jersey v. New York
No. 5, Original, October Term, 1950. New Jersey v. New York et al. Theodore D. Parsons, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Robert Peacock, Deputy Attorney General, for complainant. Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney General, Wendell P. Brown
Daniels v. Allen
No. 626. No. 643. No. 670. No. 669. Daniels et al. v. Allen, Warden Speller v. Allen, Warden Brown v. Allen, Warden United States ex rel. Smith v. Baldi, Superintendent argued April 28, 1952; argued April 29, 1952; argued April 29, 1952; ar
Williams v. Illinois
No. 235, Mise. Williams v. Illinois. Petitioner pro se. Ivan A. Elliott, Attorney General of Illinois, and William C. Wines, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. United States
No. 759. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen et al. v. United States. Clifford D. O’Brien, Ruth Weyand, Harold C. Heiss, Charles W. Phillips and V. C. Shuttle-worth for petitioners. Solicitor General Perlman for the United State
Casey v. United States
CASEY et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 379. Submitted March. 3, 1952. Decided June 9, 1952. F. M. Reischling submitted on brief for petitioners. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Mclnerney, James L. Morrisson, Beatrice Rosen
Leland v. Oregon
LELAND v. OREGON. No. 176. Argued January 29, 1952. Decided June 9, 1952. Thomas H. Ryan argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Harold L. Davidson. J. Raymond Carskadon and Charles Eugene Raymond argued the cause for appe
Isbrandtsen Co. v. Johnson
ISBRANDTSEN COMPANY, INC. v. JOHNSON. No. 493. Argued April 23, 1952. Decided June 9, 1952. Mark D. Alspach argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Thomas E. Byrne, Jr. William M. Alper argued the cause for respondent. Wi
Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Howard
BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD TRAINMEN et al. v. HOWARD et al. No. 458. Argued April 22, 1952. Decided June 9, 1952. Charles R. Judge argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Wayland K. Sullivan. Joseph C. Waddy and Victor Pack
Cohen v. United States
No. 468. No. 586. No. 601. No. 625. No. 636. Cohen v. United States, Olin Industries, Inc., Winchester Repeating Arms Company Division, v. National Labor Relations Board, Erie Forge Co. v. United States, College Homes, Inc. v. United States
Mitchell v. Illinois
No. 473, Misc. Mitchell v. Illinois.
Barbeau v. United States
No. 420, Misc. Barbeau v. United States. George B. Grigsby and Harold J. Butcher for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Mclnerney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Murry Lee Randall for the United States.
Stuart Laboratories, Inc. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.
No. 703. Stuart Laboratories, Inc. et al. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. Thomas Turner Cooke for petitioners. Richard Russell Wolfe for respondent.
United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
No. 719. United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America et al. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp. et al. Arthur Kinoy and Frank J. Donner for petitioners. John C. Bane, Jr. for the Westinghouse Electric Corporation, and Benjamin C. Sigal
Moran v. United States
No. 704. Moran v. United States. Henry G. Singer for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Mc-Inerney and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Southern Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
No. 691. Southern Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board. Gessner T. McCorvey for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, George J. Bott, David P. Findling, Mozart G. Ratner and Bernard Dunau for respondent.
F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Contemporary Arts, Inc.
No. 734. F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Contemporary Arts, Inc. Martin A. Schenck and Kenneth W. Greenawalt for petitioner. Cedric W. Porter for respondent.
Roach v. Supreme Court of Indiana
No. 497, Misc. Roach v. Supreme Court of Indiana.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.