Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1953 Cases
340 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Wilson v. Reynolds
No. 615. Wilson, Secretary of Defense, et al. v. Reynolds et al. Solicitor General Cummings for the Secretary of Defense et al., petitioners. Claude L. Dawson for respondents.
Conforti v. United States
No. 600. Conforti v. United States. William C. Wines for petitioner. Acting Solicitor General Stern, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. May sack for the United States.
Warner & Swasey Co. v. War Contracts Price Adjustment Board
No. 588. Warner & Swasey Co. v. War Contracts Price Adjustment Board et al. Sturgis Warner, John S. Walker, Luther Day and Curtis C. Williams, Jr. for petitioner. Acting Solicitor General Stern, Assistant Attorney General Burger, Samuel D.
Vahlberg v. Oklahoma
No. 581. Vahlberg v. Oklahoma. John B. Ogden for petitioner. Mac Q. Williamson, Attorney General of Oklahoma, and Owen J. Watts, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, Local Union Number 406 v. Postma ex rel. Harold F. Postma Gravel Co.
No. 446. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Local Union Number 406, et al. v. Postma, doing business as Harold F. Postma Gravel Co., et al. David Previant and George S. Fitzgerald for pe
Miller v. Eidson
No. 357, Misc. No. 362, Misc. No. 370, Misc. No. 371, Misc. No. 376, Misc. No. 379, Misc. No. 393, Misc. Miller v. Eidson, Warden; Bergen v. Warden, Maryland State Penitentiary; Boyden v. McGee, Director, Department of Corrections of Califo
Bridges v. United States
April 6, 1953. No. 548. Bridges et al. v. United States. Telford Taylor and Norman Leonard for petitioners. Acting Solicitor General Stern filed a memorandum for the United States in opposition.
New Jersey v. New York
NEW JERSEY v. NEW YORK et al. No. 5, Original, October Term, 1950. Argued March 9, 1953. Decided April 6, 1953. Abraham L. Freedman argued the cause for the City of Philadelphia. With him on the brief was Robert M. Landis. John P. McOrath a
United States v. Gilbert Associates, Inc.
UNITED STATES v. GILBERT ASSOCIATES, INC. No. 440. Argued March 11, 1953. Decided April 6, 1953. Harry Baum argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Cummings, Assistant Attorney General Holland, E
United States v. Certain Parcels of Land in the County of Fairfax
UNITED STATES v. CERTAIN PARCELS OF LAND IN THE COUNTY OF FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA, et al. No. 253. Argued January 9, 1953. Decided April 6, 1953. Assistant Attorney General Kirks argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were
Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman
FORD MOTOR CO. v. HUFFMAN et al. NO. 193. Argued December 18-19, 1952. Decided April 6, 1953. William T. Gossett argued the cause for petitioner in No. 193. With him on the brief were L. Homer Surbeck and Richard W. Hogue, Jr. Harold A. Cra
Dameron v. Brodhead
DAMERON v. BRODHEAD, MANAGER OF REVENUE & EX-OFFICIO TREASURER OF THE CITY & COUNTY OF DENVER. No. 302. Argued February 4, 1953. Decided April 6, 1953. Philip Elman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor Gener
United States v. Public Utilities Commission
UNITED STATES v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA et al. NO. 205. Argued January 14, 1953. Decided April 6, 1953. Solicitor General Cummings argued the cause for the United States in No. 205. With him on the brief Were Assistant At
In re Disbarment of Isserman
IN RE DISBARMENT OF ISSERMAN. No. 5, Misc. Decided April 6, 1953. Leonard B. Boudin for Isserman, respondent.
Healy v. Commissioner
HEALY et al. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. NO. 76. Argued December 12, 1952. Decided April 6, 1953. James H. Heffern argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioners in No. 76. Assistant Attorney General Lyon argued the cause for p
Western Pacific Railroad v. Western Pacific Railroad
WESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD CORP. et al. v. WESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. et al. NO. 150. Argued December 15-16, 1952. Decided April 6, 1953. Herman Phleger argued the cause for petitioners in No. 150. With him on the brief were Moses Lasky, Fr
Rushkowski v. Burke
No. 345, Misc. Rushkowski v. Burke, Warden, et al.
Miller v. Guthrie
No. 494. Miller v. Guthrie et al. Petitioner pro se. Hugh M. Alcorn for the Town of Suffield, respondent.
Park & Tilford Distillers Corp. v. United States
No. 544. Park & Tilford Distillers Corp. v. United States. Roswell Magill for petitioner. Solicitor General Cummings, Assistant Attorney General Holland and Ellis N. Slack for the United States.
Bloom v. Willis
No. 474. Bloom et al. v. Willis et al. W. T. Saye for petitioners. Geo. Gunby, M. C. Thompson, W. D. Cotton and Wm. H. Bronson for respondents.
Byers v. United States
No. 367, Misc. Byers v. United States.
Albertson v. Millard
ALBERTSON et al. v. MILLARD, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MICHIGAN, et al. No. 384. Argued February 2, 1953. Decided March 16, 1953. Ernest Goodman argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief was Joseph A. Brown. Edmund E. Shepherd, Solic
Heikkila v. Barber
HEIKKILA v. BARBER, DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF THE IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, et al. No. 426. Argued February 4-5, 1953. Decided March 16, 1953. Joseph Forer and Lloyd E. McMurray argued the cause for appellant. With them on the brie
Shaughnessy v. United States ex rel. Mezei
SHAUGHNESSY, DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION, v. UNITED STATES ex rel. MEZEI. No. 139. Argued January 7-8, 1953. Decided March 16, 1953. Ross L. Malone, Jr. argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Sol
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.