Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1953 Cases
340 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Unexcelled Chemical Corp. v. United States
UNEXCELLED CHEMICAL CORP. v. UNITED STATES. No. 293. Argued January 9, 1953. Decided March 9, 1953. George Morris Fay argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were John P. Burke and Edward L. Carey for petitioner. James R. Bro
United States v. Rumely
UNITED STATES v. RUMELY. No. 87. Argued December 11-12, 1952. Decided March 9, 1953. Oscar H. Davis argued the cause for the United States. With him on the main brief was Robert L. Stern, then Acting Solicitor General. With him on a reply b
United States v. Kahriger
UNITED STATES v. KAHRIGER. No. 167. Argued December 16-17, 1952. Decided March 9, 1953. Robert L. Stern argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Cummings, Assistant Attorney General Murray and Bea
Thomas v. Hempt Bros.
THOMAS v. HEMPT BROTHERS. No. 410. Argued February 3, 1953. Decided March 9, 1953. Henry C. Kessler, Jr. argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Richard W. Oaliher. James H. Booser argued the cause for respondent. With hi
Alstate Construction Co. v. Durkin
ALSTATE CONSTRUCTION CO. v. DURKIN, SECRETARY OF LABOR. No. 296. Argued February 2-3, 1953. Decided March 9, 1953. Samuel A. Schreckengaust, Jr. argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Gilbert Nurick. Bessie Margolin argu
United States v. Reynolds
UNITED STATES v. REYNOLDS et al. No. 21. Argued October 21, 1952. Decided March 9, 1953. Samuel D. Slade argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Stern and Assistant Attorney General Baldri
Hardman v. New Jersey
No. 326, Misc. Hardman v. New Jersey.
Mahoney v. Bowles
No. 277, Misc. Mahoney v. Bowles et al. Andrew W. Carroll for petitioner. Vernon E. West, Chester H. Gray and Hubert B. Pair for the District of Columbia; and Cornelius Doherty for Bowles, respondents.
Weiss v. United States
No. 507. Weiss v. United States. Sidney Morse for petitioner. Solicitor General Cummings, Assistant Attorney General Baldridge and Samuel D. Slade for the United States.
Gerundo v. Teets
No. 310, No. 311, No. 312, No. 329, No. 330, Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Gerundo v. Teets, Warden; Edwards v. Overholser; Emerson v. Callahan, Sheriff; Posey v. Dowd, Warden; and Graham v. Dowd, Warden.
New Jersey v. New York
February 9, 1953. No. 5, Original, October Term, 1950. New Jersey v. New York et al. Theodore D. Parsons, Attorney General, Robert Peacock, Deputy Attorney General, and Kenneth H. Murray for the State of New Jersey, complainant. Nathaniel L
United States v. Lane Motor Co.
UNITED STATES v. LANE MOTOR CO. No. 499. Decided February 9, 1953. Solicitor General Cummings for the United States. B. E. Harkey for respondent.
Howard v. Commissioners of the Sinking Fund
HOWARD et al. v. COMMISSIONERS OF THE SINKING FUND OF THE CITY OF LOUISVILLE et al. No. 295. Argued January 12, 1953. Decided February 9, 1953. W. A. Armstrong argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief was D. E. Armstrong. Gilb
Lutwak v. United States
LUTWAK et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 66. Argued December 8-9, 1952. Decided February 9, 1953. Anthony Bradley Eben argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Richard F. Watt and Joseph L. Nellis. Marvin E. Frankel argued th
Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding
KWONG HAI CHEW v. COLDING et al. No. 17. Argued October 17, 1952. Decided February 9, 1953. Carl S. Stern argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Blanch Freeman. John F. Davis argued the cause for respondents. With him on
Bode v. Barrett
BODE et al. v. BARRETT, SECRETARY OF STATE, et al. NO. 187. Submitted January 5, 1953. Decided February 9, 1953. Scott W. Lucas, Charles A. Thomas and Hugh J. Graham, Jr. submitted on brief for appellants in No. 187. Frank R. Reid, Jr. argu
City of Chicago v. Willett Co.
CITY OF CHICAGO v. WILLETT COMPANY. No. 23. Argued October 17, 1952. Decided February 9, 1953. Arthur Magid argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were John J. Mortimer and L. Louis Karton. Charles Dana Snewind argued the ca
United States ex rel. Smith v. Baldi
UNITED STATES ex rel. SMITH v. BALDI, SUPERINTENDENT, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY PRISON. No. 31. Argued April 29-30, 1952. Reargued October 13-14, 1952. Decided February 9, 1953. Thomas D. McBride argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the b
Brown v. Allen
BROWN v. ALLEN, WARDEN. NO. 32. Argued April 29, 1952. Reargued October 13, 1952. Decided February 9, 1953. Rosea V. Price argued the cause for petitioner in No. 32. Herman L. Taylor filed a brief for petitioner. Herman L. Taylor argued the
Mosher v. Michigan
No. 313, Misc. Mosher v. Michigan.
Kells v. Ellis
No. 284, Misc. Kells v. Ellis, General Manager, Texas Prison System, et al.
Clawson v. United States
No. 481. Clawson v. United States. William Strong for petitioner. Solicitor General Cummings, Assistant Attorney General Lyon, Ellis N. Slack and Fred G. Folsom for the United States.
Whetstone v. Sauber
No. 490. Whetstone v. Sauber, Director of Internal Revenue. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cummings, Assistant Attorney General Lyon, Ellis N. Slack and Fred E. Youngman for respondent.
Geach v. Criminal Court of Cook County, Illinois
No. 323, Misc. Geach v. Criminal Court of Cook County, Illinois.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.