Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1957 Cases
480 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
General Electric Co. v. Local 205, United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. v. LOCAL 205, UNITED ELECTRICAL, RADIO AND MACHINE WORKERS OF AMERICA (U. E.). No. 276. Argued March 26, 1957. Decided June 3, 1957. Warren F. Farr argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Lane McGove
Textile Workers Union v. Lincoln Mills
TEXTILE WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA v. LINCOLN MILLS OF ALABAMA. No. 211. Argued March 25, 1957. Decided June 3, 1957. Arthur J. Goldberg argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Benjamin Wyle and David E. Feller. Frank A. C
Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp. v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
PAN-ATLANTIC STEAMSHIP CORP. v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD CO. et al. No. 408. Argued April 23, 1957. Decided June 3, 1957. David G. Macdonald argued the cause for appellant in No. 408. With him on the brief were Russell S. Bernhard and W
Mutual Shoe Co. v. Commissioner
No. 751. No. 813. No. 440, No. 523, No. 625, Mutual Shoe Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Milner et al. v. United States, Jakalski v. United States, Holloman v. Jarnagin, Chairman, Board of Veteran’s Appeals, McClure v. Heinze, Ward
Underwood v. Knox Glass Bottle Co.
No. 959. Underwood et al. v. Knox Glass Bottle Co. et al. Wm. Harold Cox and Garner W. Green, Sr. for petitioners. Charles B. Snow and Junior O’Mara for respondents.
Duncan v. Schneckloth
No. 706, Misc. Duncan v. Schneckloth, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary.
Cioffi v. United States
No. 957. Cioffi v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Olney and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Atkins v. United States
No. 915. Atkins v. United States. Zach H. Douglas for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
Keeton v. United States
No. 881. Keeton, trading as Virginia Auto Top Co., v. United States. John W. Riely for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice and I. Henry Kutz for the United States.
National Ass'n v. Alabama ex rel. Patterson
No. 846. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama ex rel. Patterson, Attorney General. Robert L. Carter, Thurgood Marshall and Arthur D. Shores for petitioner. John Patterson, Attorney General of Alabama, and Ma
Parmelee Transportation Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
No. 906. Parmelee Transportation Co. et al. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. et al. Lee A. Freeman and Philip B. Kurland for the Parmelee Transportation Co., appellant-petitioner. F. D. Feeney, Jr. and Amos M. Mathews for the Atch
Hargett v. Summerfield
No. 945. Hargett v. Summerfield, Postmaster General, et al. John R. Foley for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub and Paul A. Sweeney for respondents.
White v. New York
No. 692, Misc. White v. New York. Roger Hinds for appellant.
Rabang v. Boyd
RABANG v. BOYD, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE. No. 403. Argued May 1, 1957. Decided May 27, 1957. John Caughlan argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. J. F. Bishop argued the cause for respondent. Wit
Grunewald v. United States
GRUNEWALD v. UNITED STATES. NO. 183. Argued April 3-4, 1957. Decided May 27, 1957. Edward J. Bennett argued the cause for petitioner in No. 183. With him on the brief was Harold H. Corbin. Henry G. Singer argued the cause for petitioner in
Libson Shops, Inc. v. Koehler
LIBSON SHOPS, INC., v. KOEHLER, DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE. No. 64. Argued January 15, 1957. Decided May 27, 1957. Henry C. Lowenhaupt and Owen T. Armstrong argued the cause for petitioner. With them on the brief was Abraham Lowe
Achilli v. United States
ACHILLI v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 430 and 834. Argued May 2, 1957. Decided May 27, 1957. Peter B. Atwood argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Assistant Attorney General Rice argued the cause for the United States. With him on the
Douglas v. New York
No. 699, Misc. Douglas v. New York.
Mashburn v. Ellis
No. 582, Misc. Mashburn v. Ellis, General Manager, Texas Prison System.
Gray v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
No. 960. Gray et al. v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co. Daniel L. Stonebridge and Wilbur E. Dow, Jr. for petitioners. Cletus Keating and Edward L. Smith for respondent.
Enterprise Industries, Inc. v. Texas Co.
No. 882. Enterprise Industries, Inc., v. Texas Company. Wallace R. Burke for petitioner. Milton Handler and Oscar John Dorwin for- respondent.
Weller v. Maryland
No. 702, No. 708, No. 712, No. 716, No. 734, Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Weller v. Maryland et al.; Horner v. Smyth, Superintendent, Virginia State Penitentiary; Burkhart v. Maryland et al.; Bell v. Maryland et al.; and Stone v. Tuck, She
Barton v. Sentner
No. 728. No. 784. Barton, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, v. Sentner; and Sentner v. Barton, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Olney an
Whitaker Cable Corp. v. Federal Trade Commission
No. 817. Whitaker Cable Corp. v. Federal Trade Commission,
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.