Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1957 Cases
480 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Achilli v. United States
No. 430. No. 834. Achilli v. United States. Achilli v. United States. The motion for leave to file brief of L. B. Binion, as amicus curiae, is granted. Jacob Kossman and Frederick Bernays Wiener for movant.
Favors v. Coiner
No. 719. Favors v. Coiner, Acting Warden. David Oinsburg, acting under appointment by the Court, 352 U. S. 997, for petitioner. W. W. Barron, Attorney General of West Virginia, and Fred H. Caplan, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Pennsylvania v. Board of Directors
PENNSYLVANIA et al. v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CITY TRUSTS OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA. No. 769. Decided April 29, 1957. Thomas D. McBride, Attorney General, and Lois O. Forer, Deputy Attorney General, for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Ab
Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.
FOURCO GLASS CO. v. TRANSMIRRA PRODUCTS CORP. et al. No. 310. Argued April 2, 1957. Decided April 29, 1957. Edward S. Irons argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Harold J. Birch. W. R. Hulbert argued the cause for respo
United States ex rel. Sherman v. Carter
UNITED STATES for the benefit of SHERMAN et al., TRUSTEES, v. CARTER et al., doing business as CARTER CONSTRUCTION CO., et al. No. 48. Argued December 5, 1956. Decided April 29, 1957. Thomas E. Stanton, Jr. argued the cause for petitioners.
United States v. Witkovich
UNITED STATES v. WITKOVICH. No. 295. Argued February 28, 1957. Decided April 29, 1957. John F. Davis argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Ros
United States v. International Union United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers
No. 44. No. 735. No. 488, No. 558, United States v. International Union United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW-CIO), Union Leader Corp. v. McLaughlin, Alvin v. Michigan, Stone v. Wyoming ex rel. Guy,
Giz v. Brownell
No. 832. Giz v. Brownell, Attorney General. Jack Wasserman and David Carliner for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Carl H. Imlay for respondent.
Lewis v. Moore
No. 347, Misc. Lewis v. Moore, Warden. Petitioner pro se. Will Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, and L. W. Gray, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Davies v. Illinois
No. 589, Misc. Davies v. Illinois.
Scott v. RKO Radio Pictures
No. 852. Scott v. RKO Radio Pictures. Robert W. Kenny and Charles J. Katz for petitioner. Irving M. Walker for respondent.
Axilrod v. Minnesota
No. 831. Axilrod v. Minnesota. Max M. Kampelman for petitioner. Miles Lord, Attorney General of Minnesota, Victor J. Michaelson, Special Assistant Attorney General, George M. Scott, Bruce C. Stone and Per M. Larson for respondent.
Local No. 332, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad
No. 826. Local No. 332, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, et al. v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Co. David Previant and George S. Fitzgerald for petitioners. H. Victor Spike for respond
Taylor v. Fahs
No. 807. Taylor v. Fahs, Collector of Internal Revenue. Philip Elijah Paine for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice, A. F. Prescott and Walter Akerman, Jr. for respondent.
Heikkinen v. United States
No. 819. Heikkinen v. United States. David Rein and Joseph Forer for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and J. F. Bishop for the United States.
Achilli v. United States
No. 430. Achilli v. United States.
Schenley Distillers, Inc. v. Bingler
No. 775. Schenley Distillers, Inc., et al. v. Bingler, District Director of Internal Revenue. Elder W. Marshall for appellants. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice, Hilbert P. Zarky and Melva M. Graney for appellee.
Automobile Club v. Commissioner
AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF MICHIGAN v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. No. 89. Argued March 6-7, 1957. Decided April 22, 1957. Ellsworth C. Alvord and Raymond H. Berry argued the cause for petitioner. With them on the brief were A. H. Moorman and
Alleghany Corp. v. Breswick & Co.
ALLEGHANY CORPORATION et al. v. BRESWICK & CO. et al. NO. 36. Argued January 23-24, 1957. Decided April 22, 1957. Whitney North Seymour argued the cause for the Al-leghany Corporation, appellant in No. 36. With him on the brief were David H
United States Gypsum Co. v. National Gypsum Co.
No. 11. United States Gypsum Co. v. National Gypsum Co. et al.,
Brennan v. United States
No. 786. Brennan et al. v. United States. Edward Bennett Williams, Elmer J. Ryan, Benedict S. Deinard and Melvin H. Siegel for petitioners. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Julia P. Cooper f
Holman v. Butler
No. 787. Holman et al. v. Butler, Executrix, et al. Albert W. Dilling and Kirkpatrick W. Dilling for petitioners. Richard Z. Lam-berson for respondents.
Payne v. Arkansas
No. 610, Misc. Payne v. Arkansas. Wiley A. Branton for petitioner. Bruce Bennett, Attorney General of Arkansas, and Thorp Thomas, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
United States v. Louisiana
No. 11, Original. United States v. Louisiana.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.