Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1958 Cases
536 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Griffin v. United States
No. 690, Misc. Griffin v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Anderson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Felicia Dubrovsky for the United States.
Covington v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America
No. 618, Misc. Covington v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America et al. Richard E. McDaniel for petitioner. J. Austin Barnes for respondents.
Mansfield v. United States
No. 989. Mansfield et ux. v. United States. Lloyd Fletcher and Scott P. Crampton for petitioners. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice, Harry Baum and Grant W. Wiprud for the United States.
Farnum v. Connecticut
No. 963. Farnum v. Connecticut et al.
United States v. Radio Corp. of America
No. 943. United States v. Radio Corporation of America et al. Probable jurisdiction noted. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Daniel M. Friedman, Bernard M. Hollander and Raymond M. Carlson for the United States. B
New York Central Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
No. 838. No. 918. No. 948. New York Central Railroad Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners of New Jersey et al.; Erie Railroad Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners of New Jersey et al.; and New York, Susquehanna & Western Rai
House v. Grimes
No. 796, No. 801, No. 802, Misc. Misc. Misc. House v. Grimes, Sheriff; Giroux v. Langlois, Acting Warden; and Sanders v. Madigan, Warden, et al.
Rogers v. Richmond
ROGERS v. RICHMOND, WARDEN. No. 755, Misc. Decided June 16, 1958. Louis H. Poliak for petitioner. Abraham S. Ullman for respondent.
Cash v. United States
CASH v. UNITED STATES. No. 723, Misc. Decided June 16, 1958. Eugene Gressman for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Anderson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
DeFebio v. County School Board
DeFEBIO et al. v. COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF FAIRFAX COUNTY et al. No. 677, Misc. Decided June 16, 1958. C. Douglas Adams, Jr. and Albert I. Kassabian for appellants. A. S. Harrison, Jr., Attorney General of Virginia, Kenneth C. Patty and R. D.
Triplett v. Iowa
TRIPLETT v. IOWA. No. 547. Argued May 21, 1958. Decided June 16, 1958. Thomas 0. Tacy argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Herbert S. French. Freeman H. Forrest, Assistant Attorney General of Iowa, argued the cause for
Eskridge v. Washington State Board of Prison Terms & Paroles
ESKRIDGE v. WASHINGTON STATE BOARD OF PRISON TERMS AND PAROLES. No. 96. Argued May 19, 1958. Decided June 16, 1958. Robert W. Graham, acting under appointment by the Court, 354 U. S. 936, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. J
Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles et Commerciales, S. A. v. Rogers
SOCIETE INTERNATIONALE POUR PARTICIPATIONS INDUSTRIELLES ET COMMERCIALES, S. A., v. ROGERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, SUCCESSOR TO THE ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN, et al. No. 348. Argued May 1, 1958. Decided June 16, 1958. John J. Wilson argued the ca
Rogers v. Quan
ROGERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, v. QUAN et al. No. 396. Argued May 20, 1958. Decided June 16, 1958. Leonard B. Sand argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Anderson, Beatric
Leng May Ma v. Barber
LENG MAY MA v. BARBER, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE. No. 105. Argued May 20, 1958. Decided June 16, 1958. Joseph S. Hertogs argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Leonard B. Sand argued the cause for
United States v. Central Eureka Mining Co.
UNITED STATES v. CENTRAL EUREKA MINING CO. et al. No. 29. Argued January 7, 1958. Decided June 16, 1958. Assistant Attorney General Doub argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Melvin Ric
Dayton v. Dulles
DAYTON v. DULLES, SECRETARY OF STATE. No. 621. Argued April 10, 1958. Decided June 16, 1958. Harry I. Rand argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief we
Kent v. Dulles
KENT et al. v. DULLES, SECRETARY OF STATE. No. 481. Argued April 10, 1958. Decided June 16, 1958. Leonard B. Boudin argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Victor Rabinowitz and David Rein. Daniel G. Marshall was also o
Local 1976, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners v. National Labor Relations Board
LOCAL 1976, UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA, A. F. L., et al. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD. No. 127. Argued March 12, 1958. Decided June 16, 1958. Arthur Garrett argued the cause for petitioners in No. 127. With
City of Chicago v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
CITY OF CHICAGO v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO. et al. No. 103. Argued March 5-6, 1958. Decided June 16, 1958. Joseph F. Grossman argued the cause for petitioner in No. 103. With him on the brief was John C. Melaniphy. Philip B.
Flora v. United States
FLORA v. UNITED STATES. No. 492. Argued May 20, 1958. Decided June 16, 1958. Randolph W. Thrower argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was A. G. McClintock. W. A. Sutherland and Mac Asbill, Jr. entered an appearance for pet
New Yorker Magazine, Inc. v. Gerosa
No. 816. No. 850. No. 859. No. 334, No. 510, No. 554, Misc. Misc. Misc. New Yorker Magazine, Inc., v. Gerosa, Comptroller of the City of New York, et al., Pompei Winery, Inc., v. Ohio Board of Liquor Control, Boston & Providence Railroad Co
City of Detroit v. Murray Corp. of America
No. 18. No. 36. City of Detroit et al. v. Murray Corporation of America et al.; and City of Detroit et al. v. Murray Corporation of America et al.,
Smallwood v. Maryland
No. 749, Misc. Smallwood v. Maryland.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.