Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1958 Cases
536 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Caritativo v. California
No. 561. Caritativo v. California et al. George T. Davis for petitioner.
Hill v. United States
HILL v. UNITED STATES. No. 287, Mise. Decided June 2, 1958. Howard Adler, Jr. for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General McLean and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Bonetti v. Rogers
BONETTI v. ROGERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al. No. 94. Argued April 7, 1958. Decided June 2, 1958. Joseph Forer argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was David Rein. Roger Fisher argued the cause for respondents. With him on a
United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.
UNITED STATES v. PROCTER & GAMBLE CO. et al. No. 51. Argued April 28, 1958. Decided June 2, 1958. Robert A. Bicks argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Daniel
Litterio v. United States
No. 409, No. 503, No. 541, No. 560, Mise. Mise. Mise. Mise. Litterio v. United States, Dunn v. United States, Ritchie v. Illinois, Williams v. Mulcahey, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service,
Orleans Parish School Board v. Bush
No. 979. Orleans Parish School Board v. Bush et al. Thurgood Marshall for respondents.
Gernie v. United States
No. 914. Gernie et al. v. United States. Jacob W. Friedman for petitioners. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Anderson■ and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. Railroad Retirement Board
No. 908. Railway Express Agency, Inc., v. Railroad Retirement Board et al. Robert J. Fletcher and Francis M. Shea for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Morton Hollander, Lionel Kestenbaum, Myles F. Gibbo
Local 24, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Oliver
No. 927. Local 24, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, AFL-CIO, et al. v. Oliver et al. David Previant, Robert C. Knee and Bruce Laybourne for petitioners. Stanley Denlinger for Oliver, and
Uphaus v. Wyman
May 26, 1958. No. 778. Uphaus v. Wyman, Attorney General of New Hampshire. Leonard B. Boudin for movant-appellant.
Amlin v. Verbeem
AMLIN et al., doing business as AMLIN CARTAGE, et al. v. VERBEEM, doing business as PETERS CARTAGE, et al. No. 881. Decided May 26, 1958. George H. Cholack for .appellants. Wilhelmina Boersma and Wilber M. Brucker, Jr. for appellees.
Ellis v. United States
ELLIS v. UNITED STATES. No. 293, Misc. Decided May 26, 1958. Kingdon Gould, Jr. for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General McLean and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Maisenberg v. United States
MAISENBERG v. UNITED STATES. No. 76. Argued January 28, 1958. Decided May 26, 1958. Ernest Goodman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was George W. Crockett, Jr. J. F. Bishop argued the cause for the United States. On th
Nowak v. United States
NOWAK v. UNITED STATES. No. 72. Argued January 28, 1958. Decided May 26, 1958. Ernest Goodman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was George W. Crockett, Jr. J. F. Bishop argued the cause for the United States. With him o
International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers v. Russell
INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AIRCRAFT AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA (UAW-CIO) et al. v. RUSSELL. No. 21. Argued December 11-12, 1957. Decided May 26, 1958. J. R. Goldthwaite, Jr. argued the cause for petitioners.
International Ass'n of Machinists v. Gonzales
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS et al. v. GONZALES. No. 31. Argued December 12, 1957. Decided May 26, 1958. Plato E. Papps and Eugene K. Kennedy argued the cause for petitioners. With them on the brief was Bernard Dunau. Lloyd E. Mc
Kovacs v. Brewer
KOVACS v. BREWER. No. 200. Argued April 3, 1958. Decided May 26, 1958. Louis Haimoff argued the cause for petitioner. On the brief was Harris B. Steinberg. No appearance for respondent.
United States v. McNinch
UNITED STATES v. McNINCH, doing business as HOME COMFORT CO., et al. No. 146. Argued April 1, 1958. Decided May 26, 1958. Assistant Attorney General Doub argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General R
Rainwater v. United States
RAINWATER et al., doing business as R. S. RAINWATER & SONS, et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 276. Argued April 2, 1958. Decided May 26, 1958. Leon B. Catlett argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioners. Assistant Attorney General Doub ar
Eubanks v. Louisiana
EUBANKS v. LOUISIANA. No. 550. Argued April 30-May 1, 1958. Decided May 26, 1958. Herbert J. Gar on argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Leopold Stahl. Michael E. Culligan, Assistant Attorney General of Louisiana, argu
White v. New York
No. 625, Mise. White v. New York.
Hartfield v. Ragen
No. 606, Mise. Hartfield v. Ragen, Warden.
Anderson v. Britton
No. 573, Mise. Anderson v. Britton, Sheriff, et al.
Lyles v. United States
No. 423, Mise. Lyles v. United States. Robert T. S. Colby for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General McLean and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.