Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1958 Cases
536 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Erwin v. Granquist
No. 917. Erwin et al. v. Granquist, District Director of Internal Revenue. Warde H. Erwin, pro se, and for Mary Lou Erwin, petitioners. Solicitor General Rankin for respondent.
Gulledge v. Commissioner
No. 899. Gulledge et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Wilton H. Wallace, Henry F. Lerch and B. G. de Quevedo for petitioners. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice, Harry Baum, and Joseph Kovner for respondent.
County School Board v. Thompson
No. 887. County School Board, Arlington, Virginia, et al. v. Thompson et al. Albertis S. Harrison, Jr., Attorney General of Virginia, Henry T. Wickham, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, Frank L. Ball and James H. Simmonds for petit
United States Plywood Corp. v. City of Algoma
No. 885. United States Plywood Corp. v. City of Algoma. Roger C. Minahan for petitioner.
Davis v. Alvis
No. 517, No. 626, No. 681, No. 689, Mise. Mise. Mise. Mise. Davis v. Alvis, Superintendent, Ohio Penitentiary, et al.; Jackson v. Heinze, Warden; Shepherd v. Rogers, Attorney General, et al.; and Novak v. Pinto, Superintendent, New Jersey S
California v. Washington
May 19, 1958. No. 13, Original. California v. Washington. Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General, Wallace Howland, Assistant Attorney General, and Leonard M. Sperry, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, for the State of California, plaintiff. John J. O
Alhambra Gold Mine Corp. v. Alhambra-Shumway Mines, Inc.
ALHAMBRA GOLD MINE CORP. v. ALHAMBRA-SHUMWAY MINES, INC. No. 880. Decided May 19, 1958. Jerome Weber for appellant. Richard Z. Lamberson for appellee.
Porchetta v. Ohio
PORCHETTA v. OHIO. No. 863. Decided May 19, 1958. Henry Lavine for appellant. John T. Corrigan for appellee.
Babcock v. California
BABCOCK v. CALIFORNIA. No. 853. Decided May 19, 1958. Austin Clapp for appellant. Roger Arnebergh and Philip E. Grey for appellee.
Sacher v. United States
SACHER v. UNITED STATES. No. 828. Decided May 19, 1958. Hubert T. Delany, Frank J. Donner and Teljord Taylor for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Tompkins, Philip R. Monahan and Doris H. Spangenburg for the U
Ciucci v. Illinois
CIUCCI v. ILLINOIS. No. 157. Argued March 13, 1958. Decided May 19, 1958. George N. Leighton argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Loring B. Moore and William R. Ming, Jr. William G. Wines, Assistant Attorney General o
Payne v. Arkansas
PAYNE v. ARKANSAS. No. 99. Argued March 3, 1958. Decided May 19, 1958. Wiley A. Branton argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Thorp Thomas, Assistant Attorney General of Arkansas, argued the cause for respondent. With him on th
Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.
BYRD v. BLUE RIDGE RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. No. 57. Argued January 28, 1958. Restored to the calendar for reargument March 3, 1958. Reargued April 28-29, 1958. Decided May 19, 1958. Henry Hammer argued the cause for petitioner. With
Federal Maritime Board v. Isbrandtsen Co.
FEDERAL MARITIME BOARD v. ISBRANDTSEN COMPANY, INC., et al. No. 73. Argued December 11, 1957. Decided May 19, 1958. Warner W. Gardner argued the causes for the Federal Maritime Board, petitioner in No. 73 and respondent in No. 74. With him
Hoag v. New Jersey
HOAG v. NEW JERSEY. No. 40. Argued November 19, 1957. Decided May 19, 1958. Robert E. Knowlton, acting under appointment by the Court, 352 U. S. 958, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. David D. Furman, Deputy Attorney Genera
Public Service Commission v. United States
PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF UTAH et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 15. Argued December 9, 1957. Decided May 19, 1958. Calvin L. Rampton and Keith Sohm argued the cause for appellants. With them on the brief were E. R. Cal-lister, Attorney
County of Marin v. United States
COUNTY OF MARIN et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 415. Argued April 9, 1958. Decided May 19, 1958. Spurgeon Avakian argued the cause for appellants-. With him on the brief was Leland H. Jordan. Robert W. Ginnane argued the cause for the Un
United States v. Cores
UNITED STATES v. CORES. No. 455. Argued March 13, 1958. Decided May 19, 1958. John F. Davis argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General McLean, Beatrice Rosenberg and
Thomas v. Arizona
THOMAS v. ARIZONA. No. 88. Argued March 4-5, 1958. Decided May 19, 1958. W. Edward Morgan argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Wesley E. Polley, Special Assistant Attorney General of Arizona, and John O. Pidgeon argued the cau
Masciale v. United States
MASCIALE v. UNITED STATES. No. 84. Argued January 16, 1958. Decided May 19, 1958. Merrell E. Clark, Jr. argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. James W. Knapp argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor Ge
Sherman v. United States
SHERMAN v. UNITED STATES. No. 87. Argued January 16, 1958. Decided May 19, 1958. Henry A. Lowenberg argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. James W. Knapp argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor Genera
Bowers v. Steiner
No. 585, Mise. Bowers v. Steiner, Warden.
Fryer v. United States
No. 494, Misc. Fryer v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General McLean, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
Marquez v. Aviles
No. 925. Marquez et al. v. Aviles. Bolívar Pagan for petitioners. Walter L. Newsom, Jr. for respondent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.