Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1959 Cases
510 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United States ex rel. Chase v. Keenan
No. 716, Misc. United States ex rel. Chase v. Keenan, Warden, et al.
Shannon v. United States
No. 700, Misc. Shannon v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.'
Kennedy v. United States
No. 682, Misc. Kennedy v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Rankin-, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey, Beatrice Rosenberg and Jerome M. Feit for the United States.
Gray v. Keenan
No. 558, Misc. Gray v. Keenan, Warden. Petitioner pro se. Edward C. Boyle for respondent.
Darlington v. Studebaker-Packard Corp.
No. 815. Darlington v. Studebaker-Packard Corp. Owen W. Crumpacker for petitioner. Wayne B. Easton for respondent.
Van Beuren v. McLoughlin
No. 810. Van Beuren et al. v. McLoughlin (Former Acting Collector of Internal Revenue) et al. William R. Spofford and Sherwin T. McDowell for petitioners. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice and Harry Baum for responde
Shaffer v. Evans
No. 798. Shaffer v. Evans. Clinton R. Barry and D. L. Grace for petitioner.
Berman v. United States
No. 732. No. 733. Berman et al. v. United States; and Fabric Garment Co., Inc., et al. v. United States. Milton C.Weis-man and Harry I. Rand for petitioners in No. 732. Simon H. Rifkind for petitioners in No. 733. Solicitor General Rankin,
Bates v. City of Little Rock
No. 770. Bates et al. v. City of Little Rock et al. Robert L. Carter and Frank D. Reeves for petitioners. Joseph C. Kemp for the City óf Little Rock, respondent.
Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. City of Thibodaux
No. 398. Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. City of Thibodaux. J. Blanc Monroe, Monte M. Lemann, J. Raburn Monroe, Malcolm L. Monroe and Andrew P. Carter for petitioner.
Dyer v. Securities & Exchange Commission
DYER et al. v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION et al. No. 67. Decided May 18, 1959. J. Raymond Dyer for petitioners. Solicitor General Rankin, Thomas G. Meeker, Aaron Levy, Solomon Freedman and Joseph S. Mitchell, Jr. for the Securities
DeVries v. Baumgartner's Electric Construction Co.
DeVRIES et al. v. BAUMGARTNER’S ELECTRIC CONSTRUCTION CO. No. 551. Decided May 18, 1959. Louis Sherman and Joseph M. Stone for petitioners. Melvin T. Woods for respondent.
Patterson v. United States
PATTERSON, GENERAL ADMINISTRATOR, et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 429. Argued April 21, 1959. Decided May 18, 1959. Jacob Bassner argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioners. .Leavenworth Colby argfied the cause for the United 'States.
T. I. M. E. Inc. v. United States
T. I. M. E. INCORPORATED v. UNITED STATES. No. 68. Argued January 20, 1959. Decided May 18, 1959. W. D. Benson, Jr. argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner in No; 68. Brycé Rea, Jr. argued the cause for petitioner in No. 96. With
Dick v. New York Life Insurance
DICK v. NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE CO. No. 58. Argued January 12, 1959. Decided May 18, 1959. Philip B. Vogel argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Pershing Boe and Donald C. Holand. Norman G. Tenneson argued the. cause f
Brown v. New York
May 11, 1959. No. 792, Misc. Brown v. New York. Petitioner pro se.
Palmer v. Waterman Steamship Corp.
No. 710. Palmer v. Waterman Steamship Corp. Edwin J. Friedman for petitioner. Francis L. Tetreault for respondent.
Goldman v. H. Harris & Co.
No. 782. Goldman et al. v. H. Harris & Co., Inc., et al. Sigmund Tim-berg for petitioners. Richard Maguire and John L. Saltonstall, Jr. for respondents.
National Labor Relations Board v. Deena Artware, Inc.
No. 790. National Labor Relations Board v. Deena Artware, Inc., et al. Solicitor General Rankin, Ralph S- Spritzer, Jerome D. Fenton, Thomas J. McDer-mott, Dominick L. Manoli and Irving M-. Herman for petitioner. James G. Wheeler, Mervin N.
New York Central Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners of New Jersey
May 4, 1959. No. 41. New York Central Railroad Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners of New Jersey et al. Thomas E. Dewey and Gerald E. Dwyer for the New York Central Railroad Co., appellant-movant. On a stipulation of the parties fo
Milwaukie Co. v. Mullen
MILWAUKIE COMPANY OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES v. MULLEN et al. No. 767. Decided May 4, 1959. Hayden C. Covington for appellant.
St. Peter's Roman Catholic Parish v. Urban Redevelopment Authority
ST. PETER’S ROMAN CATHOLIC PARISH v. URBAN REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF PITTSBURGH et al. No. 749. Decided May 4, 1959. Louis C. Glasso for appellant. Theodore L. Hazlett, Jr. and R. J. Hopkins for appellees.
Grocery Drivers Union Local 848 v. Seven Up Bottling Co.
GROCERY DRIVERS UNION LOCAL 848 et al. v. SEVEN UP BOTTLING CO. OF LOS ANGELES, INC. No. 169. Decided May 4, 1959. John C. Stevenson, Clarence E. Todd and Herbert M. Ansell for appellants. Thomas P. Menzies and Carl M. Gould for appellee.
Arroyo v. United States
ARROYO v. UNITED STATES. No. 246. Argued March 2, 1959. Decided May 4, 1959. John R. Hally argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Robert W. Meserve. Eugene S. Grimm argued the cause for the United States. With him on the
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.