Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1959 Cases
510 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Pollino v. New York
No. 826, Misc. Pollino v. New York.
Newman v. United States
No. 783, Misc. Newman v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey, Beatrice Rosenberg and Felicia Dubrovsky .for the United States.
Bricklayers, Masons, Plasterers, Marble Masons, Tile Layers, Terrazzo Workers, and Cement Finishers' Union No. 3 v. Cone Brothers Contracting Co.
No. 930. Bricklayers, Masons, Plasterers, Marble Masons, Tile Layers, Terrazzo Workers, and Cement Finishers’ Union No. 3, Florida, v. Cone Brothers Contracting Co. Frank McClung for petitioner. William H. Agnor for respondent.
North Central Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board
No. 872. North Central Airlines, Inc., v. Civil Aeronautics Board et al. A. L. Wheeler for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Bicks, Richard A. Solomon, Franklin M. Stone, O. D. Ozment and Robert L. Toom
Lee C. Moore Corp. v. Pryor
No. 852. Lee C. Moore Corp. v. Pryor et al. Earl F. Reed for petitioner. M. A. Ned Looney for respondents.
Justus v. Woodruff
No. 841, Misc. Justus v. Woodruff, Warden.
Ford Motor Co. v. Park
FORD MOTOR CO. v. PARK et al. No. 831. Decided June 8, 1959. William, T. Gossett and L. Homer Surbeck for appellant. Abraham L. Zwerdling and Harold A. Cranefield for Park et aL, appellees. , „ Paul L. Adams, Attorney General of Michigan, S
Ohio ex rel. Eaton v. Price
OHIO ex rel. EATON v. PRICE, CHIEF OF POLICE. No. 699. Decided June 8, 1959. J. Harvey Crow for appellant. Charles S. Rhyne and Joseph P. Duffy for appellee. '
National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama ex rel. Patterson
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE v. ALABAMA ex rel. PATTERSON. No. 753. Decided June 8, 1959. Robert L. Carter, Thurgood Marshall, Arthur D. . Shores, William T. Coleman, Jr., George E. C. Hayes, William R. Ming, J
Mills v. Louisiana
MILLS et al. v. LOUISIANA. No. 74. Argued April 22, 1959. Decided June 8, 1959 Eugene Stanley argued the cause for petitioners in No. 74. With him on the brief was Albert B. Koorie. Milo B. Williams argued the cause and filed a brief for pe
Martin v. Creasy
MARTIN, SUCCESSOR TO LAWLER, SECRETARY OF HIGHWAYS OF PENNSYLVANIA, et. al. v. CREASY et al. No. 157. Argued April 2, 1959. Decided June 8, 1959. Anne X. Alpern, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, argued, the cause for appellants. On the bri
National Labor Relations Board v. Cabot Carbon Co.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. CABOT CARBON CO. et al. No. 329. Argued March 24, 1959. Decided June 8, 1959. Thomas J. McDermott argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief' were Solicitor General Rankin,' Jerome D. Fenton, Do
County of Allegheny v. Frank Mashuda Co.
COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY v. FRANK MASHUDA CO. et al. No. 347. Argued April 2, 1959. Decided June 8, 1959. Philip Baskin argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Maurice Louik and Francis A. Barry. Harold R. Schmidt argued the
Harrison v. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People
HARRISON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, et al. v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE et al. No. 127. Argued March 23-24, 1959. Decided June 8, 1959. David J. Mays and J. Segar Gravatt argued the cause for appellants.
Barenblatt v. United States
BARENBLATT v. UNITED STATES. No. 35. Argued November 18, 1958. Decided June 8, 1959. Edward J. Ennis argued' the cause for petitioner. With him on' the brief were Nanette Dembitz and David Scribner. Philip R. Monahan argued the cause for th
Uphaus v. Wyman
UPHAUS v. WYMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. No. 34. Argued November 17-18, 1958. Decided June 8, 1959. Royal W. France and Leonard B. Boudin argued the cause for appellant. With them on the brief were Hugh H. Bownes and Victor Rabin
Federal Trade Commission v. Simplicity Pattern Co.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. SIMPLICITY PATTERN CO., INC. No. 406. Argued April 21, 1959. Decided June 8, 1959. Charles H. Weston argued the causes for the Federal Trade Commission. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Rankin, Assis
Lassiter v. Northampton County Board of Elections
LASSITER v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS. No. 584. Argued May 18-19, 1959. Decided June 8, 1959. Samuel S. Mitchell argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Herman L. Taylor and James R. Walker, Jr. - I. Beverly L
Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. City of Thibodaux
LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT CO. v. CITY OF THIBODAUX. No. 398. Argued April 2, 1959. Decided June 8, 1959. J. Raburn Monroe argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were /. Blanc Monroe, Monte M. Lemann, Malcolm L. Monroe and Andr
United States v. Atlantic Refining Co.
UNITED STATES v. ATLANTIC REFINING CO. et al. No. 210. Argued April 22, 1959. Decided June 8, 1959. Robert A. Bicks argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hans
Smith v. United States
SMITH v. UNITED STATES. No. 90. Argued January 21, 1959. Decided June 8, 1959. William B. Moore, Jr. argued the cause for petitioner. With him on- the brief was Márion Rushton. Leon Silverman argued-the cause for the United States. On the b
Reed v. Smyth
No. 780, Misc. Reed v. Smyth, Superintendent, Virginia State Penitentiary.
Edelson v. New York
No. 692, Misc. Edelson v. New York.
Messina v. Clark Equipment Co.
No. 863. Messina, Administratrix, v. Clark Equipment Co. Julian Buchbinder for petitioner. John P. Smith for respondent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.