Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1959 Cases
510 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Baker v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.
BAKER et al. v. TEXAS & PACIFIC RAILWAY CO. No. 363. Argued March 25, 1959. Decided April 6, 1959. Harvey L. Davis argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioners. D. L. Case argued the cause and . filed a brief for respondent.
Parsons v. Smith
PARSONS et al. v. SMITH, FORMER COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE. No. 218. Argued March 4, 1959. Decided April 6, 1959. Sherwin T. McDowell argued the cause for petitioners in No. 218. With him on the brief were William R. Spofjord and Charles
Klor's, Inc. v. Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc.
KLOR’S, INC., v. BROADWAY-HALE STORES, INC., et al. No. 76. Argued February 25-26, 1959.— Decided April 6, 1959. Maxwell Keith argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Irvin Goldstein. Moses Lasky argued the cause for resp
Slaughter v. Georgia
No. 595, Misc. Slaughter v. Georgia.
Currie v. Texas
No. 568, Misc. Currie v. Texas.
Duncan v. United States
No. 347, Misc. Duncan v. United States. Petitioner pro. se. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant .Attorney General Anderson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Julia P. Cooper for the United-States..
Bercut-Vandervoort & Co. v. United States
No. 693. Bercut-Vandervoort & Co., Inc., v. United States. John R. Benney for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub and Alan S. -Rosenthal for the United States.
United States v. Atlantic Refining Co.
No. 210. United States v. Atlantic Refining Co. et al. Solicitor General Rankin on the motion.
Teitelbaum v. California
TEITELBAUM v. CALIFORNIA. No. 678. Decided March 30, 1959. Morris Lavine for appellant. Stanley Mask, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Herschel T. Elkins, Deputy Attorney General, for appelle
Friedman v. United States
FRIEDMAN v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 675. Decided March 30, 1959. Irving D. Friedman and Sol Friedman for appellant. Solicitor General Rankin and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees. Jos
Abbate v. United States
ABBATE et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 7. Argued October 22, 1958. Decided March 30, 1959. Charles A. Bellows argued the cause, and filed a brief for petitioners. Leonard B. Sand argued the cause for the United States. With him on. the brief w
Monrosa v. Carbon Black Export, Inc.
THE MONROSA et al. v. CARBON BLACK EXPORT, INC. No. 178. Argued March 3-4, 1959. Decided March 30, 1959. E. D. Vickery argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was George W. Renaudin. Joseph T. McGowan argued the cause for re
Service Storage & Transfer Co. v. Virginia
SERVICE STORAGE & TRANSFER CO., INC., v. VIRGINIA. No. 92. Argued February 26, 1959. Decided March 30, 1959. .Francis W.McInerny argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Robert D. Mcllwaine, III, argued the cause for respondent. O
Bartkus v. Illinois
BARTKUS v. ILLINOIS. No. 1. Argued November 19, 1957. Affirmed by an equally divided Court January 6, 1958. Rehearing granted, judgment vacated and case restored to calendar for reargument May 26, 1958. Reargued October 21-22, 1958. Decided
Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.
No. 479, Misc. Lawlor et al., trading as Independent Poster Exchange, v. National Screen Service Corp. et al. Francis T. Anderson for petitioners. Louis Nizer, Abraham L. Freedman, Louis J. Gofjman, W. Bradley Ward and Edward W. Mullinix fo
Marshall v. United States
No. 561, Misc. Marshall v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Anderson ánd Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Vraniak v. Randolph
No. 536, Misc. Vraniak v. Randolph, Warden.
Niendorf v. California
No. 515, Misc. Niendorf v. California. Edward T. Mancusb for petitioner.
Lee v. Smyth
No. 501, Misc. Lee v. Smyth, Superintendent, Virginia State Penitentiary.
Cranston v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
No. 458, Misc. Cranston v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. Louis C. Glasso for petitioner. Vincent M. Casey for respondent.
Cluck v. Commissioner
No. 701. Cluck et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Arthur Glover for petitioners.' Solicitor General Rankin-, Assistant Attorney General Rice, A, F. Prescott and Carolyn R. Just for respondent.
Reaves v. Arkansas
No. 677. Reaves v. Arkansas. Jack Holt and Jack Holt, Jr. for petitioner.
Arnfeld v. United States
No. 624. Arnfeld et al. v. United States. J. Marvin Haynes, N. Barr Miller, Joseph H. Sheppard and Arthur H. Adams for petitioners. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant. Attorney General Rice, I. Henry Kutz and Myron-C. Baum for the United S
Nez Perce Tribe of Indians v. Seaton
No. 555. Nez Perce Tribe of Indians et al. v. Seaton, Secretary of the Interior. Richard Schifter and Eugene Gress-man for petitioners. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Morton, Roger P. Marquis and Harold S. Harrison for
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.