Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1959 Cases
510 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Illinois v. Michigan
No. 15, Original. Illinois v. Michigan et al. Paul L. Adams, Attorney General, Samuel J. Torina, Solicitor General, and Nicholas V. Olds, Assistant Attorney General, for the State of Michigan; Mark McElroy, Attorney General, and Harold Read
Abel v. United States
No. 263. Abel, alias “Mark,” alias Collins, alias Goldfus, v. United States. James B. Donovan argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Thomas M. Debevoise, II. Solicitor General Rankin argued the cause for the United State
Handford v. United States
HANDFORD v. UNITED STATES. No. 578. Decided March 23, 1959. Julian Webb for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin for the United States.
City of Los Angeles v. Public Utilities Commission of California
CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al. v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA et al. No. 656. Decided March 23, 1959. Roger Arnebergh, Alan G. Campbell and Walhjred Jacobson for appellants. J. Thomason Phelps for appellees. Arthur T. George, Fran
Woody v. United States
WOODY v. UNITED STATES. No. 135. Argued January 14, 1959. Decided March 23, 1959. Clarence O. Woolsey, acting under appointment by the Court, 358 U. S. 802, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Beatrice Rosenberg argued the ca
Joseph v. Indiana
JOSEPH et al. v. INDIANA. No. 8. Argued January 19, 1959. Decided March 23, 1959. William, 8. Isham, acting under appointment by the Court, 355 U. S. 948, argued the cause and filed a brief' for petitioners. Robert M. O’Mahoney, Deputy Atto
Page v. United States
PAGE v. UNITED STATES. No. 155, Misc. Decided March 23, 1959. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Anderson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.
Spevack v. Strauss
SPEVACK v. STRAUSS et al. No. 339. Argued March 5, 1959. Decided March 23, 1959. Carleton U. Edwards II and Joseph Y. Houghton argued the cause for petitioner. With them on the brief was Bernard Margolius. Leonard B. Sand argued the cause f
Sims v. United States
SIMS v. UNITED STATES. No. 88. Argued February 26, 1959. Decided March 23, 1959. Fred H. Capian, Assistant Attorney General of West Virginia, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was W. W. Barron, Attorney General of West
Tak Shan Fong v. United States
TAK SHAN FONG v. UNITED STATES. No. 110. Argued February 24, 1959. Decided March 23, 1959. William- B. Mahoney argued'the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. John F. Davis argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solici
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Variable Annuity Life Insurance
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. VARIABLE ANNUITY LIFE INSURANCE CO. OF AMERICA et al. No. 290. Argued January 15, 19, 1959.— Decided March 23, 1959 Thomas G. Meeker argued the cause for petitioner in No. 290. With him on the brief wer
Juzwiak v. United States
No. 325, Misc. Juzwiak v. United States. William E. Willis for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Anderson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Spack v. New York
No. 503, Misc. Spack v. New York.
Kelley v. Randolph
No. 49, Misc. Kelley v. Randolph, Warden. Petitioner pro se. Latham Castle, Attorney General-of Illinois, and William C. Wine's, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Beachview Broadcasting Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission
No. 655. Beachview Broadcasting Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission. Edward P. Morgan and Herbert E. Forrest for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, John L. FitzGerald, Richard A. Solomon and Jerr
Dawley v. City of Norfolk
No. 674. Dawley v. City of Norfolk et al. Petitioner pro se.' Leonard S. Dávis and Virgil S. Gore, Jr. for respondents.
Adams v. United States
No. 657. Adams v. United States. M. R. Nachman, Jr. for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub and Alan S. Rosenthal for the United States.
Mackey v. Mendoza-Marteniz
No. 649. Mackey, Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization, et al. v. Mendoza-Marteniz. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney! General Anderson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Jerome M.-Feit for appellants.
Ganger v. City of Miami
GANGER ET AL. v. CITY OF MIAMI. No. 153. Argued March 2-3, 1959. Decided March 9, 1959. Thomas H. Anderson and Herbert L. Nadeau argued the cause for appellants. With them on the brief was Clyde Epperson. Milton M. Ferrell argued the cause
Brown v. United States
BROWN v. UNITED STATES. No. 4. Argued October 16, 1958. Decided March 9, 1959. Myron L. Shapiro argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was J. Bertram Wegman. John F. Davis argued the cause for the United: States. On the brie
United States v. Embassy Restaurant, Inc.
UNITED STATES v. EMBASSY RESTAURANT, INC., et al. No. 174. Argued January 22, 1959. Decided March 9, 1959. John F. Davis argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice, Me
Lanza v. New Jersey
No. 532. No. 537, Lanza v. New Jersey, Second Federal Savings & Loan Association of Cleveland v. Bowers, Tax Commissioner of Ohio,
Shane v. Ragen
No. 454, Misc. Shane v. Ragen, Warden.
Shivers v. Pepersack
No. 438, Misc. Shivers v. Pepersack, Warden.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.