Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1959 Cases
510 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Taylor v. McElroy
TAYLOR v. McELROY et al. No. 504. Argued March 31-April 1, 1959. Decided June 29, 1959. Joseph L. Rauh, Jr. argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were John Silard, Eugene Gressman, Harold* A. Cranefield, Daniel H. Pollitt a
Kingsley International Pictures Corp. v. Regents of the University
KINGSLEY INTERNATIONAL PICTURES CORP. v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 394. Argued April 23, 1959. Decided June 29, 1959. Ephraim London argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Seymour H. Chalif
Ingram v. United States
INGRAM et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 457. Argued April 30, 1959. Decided June 29, 1959. Wesley R. Asinof argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioners. J. Dwight Evans, Jr. argued the cause for the United ’States. On the brief were Soli
In re Sawyer
IN RE SAWYER. No. 326. Argued May 19-20, 1959. Decided June 29, 1959. John T. McTernan argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. A. William Barlow, attorney for the Bar Association of Hawaii, argued the cause for respondent. With h
Union Pacific Railroad v. Price
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. v. PRICE. No. 414. Argued March 31, 1959. Decided June 29, 1959. James A. Wilcox argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief' were E. C. Renwick, Malcolm Davis, Calvin M. Cory and IF. R. Rouse. Samuel S
Howard v. Lyons
HOWARD v. LYONS et al. No. 57. Argued December 8-9, 1958. Restored to the calendar for reargument December 15, 1958. Reargued April 20-21, 1959. Decided June 29, 1959. Paul A. Sweeney argued the cause and Daniel M. Friedman reargued the cau
Barr v. Matteo
BARR v. MATTEO et al. No. 350. Argued April 20, 1959. Decided June 29, 1959. Daniel M. Friedman argued the cause for petitioner. On the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Samuel D. Slade and Bernard Cedarb
Pennsylvania Railroad v. Day
PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO. v. DAY, ADMINISTRATOR. No. 397. Argued March 26, 1959. Decided June 29, 1959. Richard N. Clattenburg argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were F. Morse Archer, Jr., John P. Hauch, Jr. and John B.
Farmers Educational & Cooperative Union v. WDAY, Inc.
FARMERS EDUCATIONAL & COOPERATIVE UNION OF AMERICA, NORTH DAKOTA DIVISION, v. WDAY, INC. No. 248. Argued March 23, 1959. Decided June 29, 1959. Edward S. Greenbaum and Harriet F. Pilpel argued the cause for petitioner. With them on the brie
Greene v. McElroy
GREENE v. McELROY et al. No. 180. Argued April 1, 1959. Decided June 29, 1959. Carl W: Berueffy argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Assistant Attorney General Doub argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were
DeVries v. Baumgartner's Electric Construction Co.
No. 551. No. 812. No. 824. No. 747, Misc. DeVries et al. v. Baumgartner's Electric Construction Co., 359 U. S. 498; Gorska v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 359 U. S. 990; Vant et al. v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Co., 359 U. S. 1002; and Wi
Harris v. United States
No. 908, Misc. Harris v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Rankin for the United States.
Scott v. Rhay
No. 866, Misc. Scott v. Rhay, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary.
Elrick Rim Co. v. Reading Tire Machinery Co.
No. 904. Elrick Rim Co. v. Reading Tire Machinery Co., Inc., et al. Jack E. Hursh for petitioner. Albert M. Herzig for respondents.
Fogarty v. United States
No. 920. Fogarty v. United States. C. Anthony Friloux, Jr. for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
General Retail Corp. v. Commissioner
No. 909. General Retail Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. William Waller for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice, A. F. Prescott and L. W. Post for respondent.
Cagè v. Texas
No. 901. Cagè v. Texas. Ivan Irwin and M.R. Irion for petitioner.
Local Lodge No. 1424, International Ass'n of Machinists v. National Labor Relations Board
No. 780. Local Lodge No. 1424, International Association of Machinists, AFL-CIO, et al. v. National Labor Relations Board. Plato E. Papps, Louis P. Poulton and Bernard Dunau for Local Lodge No. 1424, and Frank L. Gallucci for Bryan Manufact
Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. Jacobsen
No. 820. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc., et al. v. Jacobsen, Director of the Department of Agriculture of California, et al.
Bellew v. Mississippi
BELLEW et al. v. MISSISSIPPI. No. 806. Decided June 22, 1959. Mrs. Clare Sekul Hornsby, John M. Sekul and Albert Sidney Johnston, Jr. for appellants-petitioners.
Cofield v. United States
COFIELD v. UNITED STATES. No. 677, Misc. Decided June 22, 1959. William F. McKenna for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General ■ Wilkey and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People, Inc. v. Bennett
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, INC., v. BENNETT, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ARKANSAS, et al. No. 757. Decided June 22, 1959. Robert O. Carter.and Herbert O. Reid for appellant.
Lev v. United States
LEV v. UNITED STATES. No. 435. Argued April 27-28, 1959. Decided June 22, 1959. Anthony Bradley Eben argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner in No. 435. Albert H. Treiman argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner in No. 43
Commissioner v. Hansen
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. HANSEN et ux. No. 380. Argued April 29-30, 1959. Decided June 22, 1959. Meyer Rothwacks argued the causes for the Commissioner of Internal Revenue. With him on the brief for the Commissioner were Solicito
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.