Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1963 Cases
685 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Johnson v. Virginia
JOHNSON v. VIRGINIA. No. 715. Decided April 29, 1963. Roland D. Ealey and Herman T. Benn for petitioner. Reno S. Harp III, Assistant Attorney General of Virginia, for respondent.
White v. Maryland
WHITE v. MARYLAND. No. 600. Argued April 16, 1963. Decided April 29, 1963. Fred E. Weisgal argued the cause and. filed a brief, for petitioner. Robert F. Sweeney, Assistant Attorney General of Maryland, argued the' cause for respondent. Wit
Hawaii v. Gordon
HAWAII v. GORDON. No. 12, Original. Argued April 15, 1963. Decided April 29, 1963. Bert T. Kobayashi, Attorney General of Hawaii, and Dennis G. Lyons argued the cause for plaintiff. Also on the briefs were Shiro Kashiwa, former Attorney Gen
Maximov v. United States
MAXIMOV, TRUSTEE, v. UNITED STATES. No. 240. Argued March 28, 1963. Decided April 29, 1963. David A. Lindsay argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were D. Nelson Adams, John A. Reed and John A. Cony. Louis F. Claiborne arg
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS et al. v. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD CO. No. 94. Argued February 21, 1963. Decided April 29, 1963. Harold C. Heiss argued the cause for petitioners. With him" on the briefs were Chas. I. Dawson, Russ
Sanders v. United States
SANDERS v. UNITED STATES. No. 202. Argued February 25, 1963. Decided April 29, 1963. Fred M. Vinson, Jr., by appointment of the Court, 371 U. S. 806, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Beatrice Rosenberg argued the cause for
Sharrow v. United States
No. 755, Misc. Sharrow v. United States,
White v. New York
No. 935, Misc. White v. New York.
Jenkins v. United States
No. 767, Misc. Jenkins v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox for the United States.
Allen v. Oklahoma
No. 29, Misc. Allen v. Oklahoma. Petitioner pro se. Charles Nesbitt, Attorney General of Oklahoma, and Hugh H. Collum, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Yogurt Master, Inc. v. Wirtz
No. 845. Yogurt Master, Inc., v. Wirtz, Secretary of Labor. William H. Agnor and A. R. Surles, Jr. for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Charles Donahue, Bessie Margolin, Jacob I. Karro and Beate Bloch for respondent.
MacNeil v. State Realty Co. of Boston, Inc.
No. 891. MacNeil v. State Realty Co. of Boston, Inc. Angus M. MacNeil, petitioner, pro se. Phillip Cowin for respondent.
Harrisburg Daily Market, Inc. v. Freeman
No. 744. Harrisburg Daily Market, Inc., v. Freeman, Secretary of Agriculture, et al. Charles Orlando Pratt for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Douglas and Alan S. Rosenthal for respondents.
2,872.88 Acres of Land v. United States
No. 850. 2,872.88 Acres of Land et al. v. United States. W. Lowrey Stone, Jesse G. Bowles and Forrest L. Champion, Jr. for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox for the United States.
Greene v. United States
No. 887. Greene v. United States. Eugene Gressman, George Kauf-mann and Carl W. Berueffy for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Douglas and Alan S. Rosenthal for the United States.
Hartsfield v. Wainwright
HARTSFIELD v. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR. No. 522, Misc. Decided April 22, 1963. Petitioner pro se. Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and A. G. Spicola, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Doughty v. Maxwell
DOUGHTY v. MAXWELL, WARDEN. No. 516, Misc. Decided April 22, 1963. Petitioner pro se. Mark McElroy, Attorney General of Ohio, and James E. Rattan, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Jordan v. Wiman
JORDAN v. WIMAN, WARDEN. No. 250, Misc. Decided April 22, 1963. Petitioner pro se. MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama, and David W. Clark, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Douglas v. Wainwright
DOUGLAS v. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR. No. 219, Misc. Decided April 22, 1963. Petitioner pro se. Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and George R. Georgieff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Tull v. Wainwright
TULL v. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR. No. 126, Misc. Decided April 22, 1963. Petitioner pro se. Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and James O. Mahorner, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Lindner v. Nash
LINDNER v. NASH, WARDEN. No. 61, Misc. Decided April 22, 1963. Petitioner pro se. Thomas F. Eagleton, Attorney General of Missouri, and Howard L. McFadden, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Patterson v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary
PATTERSON v. WARDEN, MARYLAND PENITENTIARY. No. 14, Misc. Decided April 22, 1963. Petitioner pro se. Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General of Maryland, and Gerard W. Wittstadt, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Tyler v. North Carolina
TYLER v. NORTH CAROLINA. No. 8, Misc. Decided April 22, 1963. Petitioner pro se. Thomas Wade Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and Ralph Moody, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
LaForge v. Wainwright
LaFORGE v. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR. No. 6, Misc. Decided April 22, 1963. Petitioner pro se. Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and Bruce R. Jacob, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.