Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1963 Cases
685 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Griffin v. Maryland
May 20, 1963. No. 26. Griffin et al. v. Maryland. Joseph L. Rauh, Jr. argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were John Silard, Joseph H. Sharlitt, Jack Greenberg and James M. Nabrit III. Robert C. Murphy, Assistant Attorney
Illinois v. United States
ILLINOIS et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 937. Decided May 20, 1963. William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, Edward V. Hanrahan, Special Assistant Attorney General, Harold A. Cowen, Assistant Attorney General, and S. Ashley Guthri
Atwood's Transport Lines, Inc. v. United States
ATWOOD’S TRANSPORT LINES, INC., v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 935. Decided May 20, 1963. James E. Wilson and Edward G. Villalon for appellant. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger/ Lionel Kestenbaum and Robert W. Ginnan
Ship-By-Truck Co. v. United States
SHIP-BY-TRUCK CO., INC., doing business as GRAHAM SHIP-BY-TRUCK CO., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 879. Decided May 20, 1963. Tom B. Kretsinger for appellants. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Humm
Avent v. North Carolina
AVENT et al. v. NORTH CAROLINA. No. 11. Argued November 5, 7, 1962. Decided May 20, 1963. Jack Greenberg argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Constance Baker Motley, James M. Nabrit III, William A. Marsh, Jr., F. B.
Gober v. City of Birmingham
GOBER et al. v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM. No. 66. Argued November 6-7, 1962. Decided May 20, 1963. Constance Baker Motley argued the cause for petitioners'. With her on the brief were Jack Greenberg, Arthur D. Shores, Peter A. Hall, Orzell Billin
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Boston & Maine Railroad
BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD CO. et al. v. BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD et al. No. 97. Argued March 27, 1963. Decided May 20, 1963 Robert W. Oinnane, Jervis Langdon, Jr., and William L. Marbury argued the cause for appellants. With Mr. Ginnane on t
Silver v. New York Stock Exchange
SILVER, doing business as MUNICIPAL SECURITIES CO., et al. v. NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE. No. 150. Argued February 25-26, 1963. Decided May 20, 1963. David I. Shapiro argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioners. A. Donald MacKinnon argue
Andrews v. United States
ANDREWS v. UNITED STATES. No. 491. Argued March 25-26, 1963. Decided May 20, 1963. E. Barrett Prettyman, Jr., by appointment of the Court, 371 U. S. 885, argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioners. Wayne G. Barnett argued the cause f
Wisconsin v. Federal Power Commission
WISCONSIN et al. v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION et al. No. 72. Argued January 9, 1963. Decided May 20, 1963. Kent H. Brown argued the cause for petitioners in No. 72. With him on the briefs were John W. Reynolds, Attorney General of Wisconsin,
Wright v. Georgia
WRIGHT et al. v. GEORGIA. No. 68. Argued November 7, 1962. Decided May 20, 1963. James M. Nabrit III argued the cause for petitioners; With him on the brief were Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, Leroy D. Clark and E. H. Gadsden. Sylv
Lombard v. Louisiana
LOMBARD et al. v. LOUISIANA. No. 58. Argued November 5-7, 1962. Decided May 20, 1963. John P. Nelson argued the cause for petitioners. With him on.the brief were Carl Rachlin, Judith P. Vlad-eck, .Robert F. Collins, Nils R. Douglas and Jane
Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham
SHUTTLESWORTH et al. v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM. No. 67. Argued November 6-7, 1962. Decided May 20, 1963. Constance Baker Motley argued the cause for .petitioners. With her on the brief were Jack Greenberg, Arthur D. Shores, Peter A. Hall, Orzel
Peterson v. City of Greenville
PETERSON et al. v. CITY OF GREENVILLE. No. 71. Argued November 6-7, 1962. Decided May 20, 1963. . Matthew J. Perry argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, James M. Nabrit III, Lin
King v. Beto
No. 1124, Misc. King v. Beto, Corrections Director, et al.
Stein v. United States
No. 997, Misc. Stein v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Sidney M. Glazer for the United States.
Morgan v. United States
No. 720, Misc. Morgan v. United States. Monroe H. Freedman for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Theodore George Gilinsky for the United States.
McCree v. Michigan
No. 674, Misc. McCree v. Michigan. Petitioner pro se. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of Michigan, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and Donald T. Kane, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Stadin v. Union Electric Co.
No. 922. Stadin v. Union Electric Co. J. Raymond Dyer for petitioner. Richmond C. Coburn and Alan C. Kohn for respondent.
Harrison-Halsted Community Group, Inc. v. Housing & Home Finance Agency
No. 861. Harrison-Halsted Community Group, Inc., et al. v. Housing & Home Finance Agency et al. George W. Overton, Frederic D. Houghteling, F. Raymond Marks, Jr. and Donald Page Moore for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorn
Fisher v. North Branch Products, Inc.
No. 961. Fisher v. North Branch Products, Inc. Robert G. Mentag and Albert W. Rinehart for petitioner.
Yeloushan v. United States
No. 953. Yeloushan v. United States. James B. McDonough, Jr. for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Durgin v. Florida
No. 932. Durgin et ux. v. Florida.
Family Record Plan, Inc. v. Commissioner
No. 874. Family Record Plan, Inc. (Dissolved), et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Thomas A. Baird, Alva C. Baird and Harold Easton for .petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and Norman H. Wolfe f
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.