Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1963 Cases
685 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission
No. 614. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al. Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Robert L. Stern, Joseph J. Daniels, Harry S. Littman and Raymond N. Shibley for pe
Lynchburg Traffic Bureau v. Smith's Transfer Corp.
No. 717. Lynchburg Traffic Bureau v. Smith's Transfer Corp. of Staunton, Virginia. W. G. Burnette for petitioner. Bryce Rea, Jr. for respondent.
Smith v. Mercer
No. 703. Smith v. Mercer, Chief Judge. Mozart G. Ratner for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and Joseph M. Howard for respondent.
Weitzner v. United States
No. 698. Weitzner, Administrator, et al. v. United States. William Gresham Ward for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and Joseph Kovner for the United States.
Gorham & Johnson, Inc. v. Chrysler Corp.
No. 685. Gorham & Johnson, Inc., v. Chrysler Corporation et al. W. B. Harrell and Fred S. Abney for petitioner. William D. Neary for respondents.
Gibraltar Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
No. 676. Gibraltar Industries, Inc., v. National Labor Relations Board. H. Raymond Cluster for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Stuart Rothman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for respondent.
Trent Trust Co. v. Kennedy
No. 662. Trent Trust Co., Ltd., et al. v. Kennedy, Attorney General, successor to the Alien Property Custodian. William D. Donnelly and Luden H. Boggs for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Guil-foyle, Mor
Crowe v. United States
No. 663. Crowe et al. v. United States. Albert J. Krieger and Theodore Krieger for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
Public Utility District No. 1 v. Federal Power Commission
No. 611. Public Utility District No. 1, Pend Oreille County, Washington, v. Federal Power Commission et al. Clarence C. Dill, Lloyd W. Ek, Joseph Volpe, Jr. and Bennett Boskey for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assisi an i Attorn
Paul v. United States
No. 373. Paul, Director of Agriculture of California, et al. v. United States. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Lawrence E. Doxsee and John Fourt, Deputy Attorneys General, and Roger Kent for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox
Arceneaux v. Louisiana
No. 42, Misc. Arceneaux v. Louisiana. J. Minos Simon for petitioner.
Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Virginia ex rel. Virginia State Bar
No. 583. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Virginia ex rel. Virginia State Bar. Beecher E. Stállard, John J. Naughton and Edward B. Henslee, Jr. for petitioner. Aubrey R. Bowles, Jr. and Aubrey R. Bowles III for respondent.
Spencer v. Wainwright
No. 800, Misc. Spencer v. Wainwright, Corrections Director.
Pensick & Gordon, Inc. v. California Motor Express
No. 222. Pensick & Gordon, Inc., v. California Motor Express et al. Carl M. Gould for petitioner. Theodore W. Bussell, George Catlin, Walt A. Steiger and Joseph P. Loeb for respondents.
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Boston & Maine Railroad
No. 97. No. 98. No. 99. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. et al. v. Boston & Maine Railroad et al.; Maryland Port Authority et al. v. Boston & Maine Railroad et al.; and Interstate Commerce Commission v. Boston & Maine Railroad et al. Thomas E.
Hawaii v. Gordon
February 18, 1963. No. 12, Original. Hawaii v. Gordon (formerly Bell). Bert T. Kobayashi, Attorney General of Hawaii, Thurman Arnold, Abe Fortas, Paul A. Porter and Dennis G. Lyons on the motion. [For earlier orders herein, see 371 U. S. 80
Sheldon v. Fannin
SHELDON et al. v. FANNIN et al. No. 656. Decided February 18, 1963. Hayden C. Covington for appellants. Robert W. Pickrell, Attorney General of Arizona, and Frank Sagarino, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
King County v. F. L. Hartung Glass Co.
KING COUNTY et al. v. F. L. HARTUNG GLASS CO., INC. No. 647. Decided February 18, 1963. William L. Paul, Jr. for appellants. Ofell H. Johnson for appellee.
Board of County Commissioners v. City of Denver
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO, et al. v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO, et al. No. 635. Decided February 18, 1963. Charles Ginsberg for appellants. Robert S. Wham, Richard P. Matsch, Charles S. Rhyne, Bri
Schneider v. Rusk
SCHNEIDER v. RUSK, SECRETARY OF STATE. No. 251. Decided February 18, 1963. Milton V. Freeman, Robert E. Herzstein, Horst Kur-nick and Charles A. Reich for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, J. William Dool
Simler v. Conner
SIMLER v. CONNER. No. 59. Argued January 9-10, 1963. Decided February 18, 1963. John B. Ogden argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner. Peyton Ford argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Leslie L. Conner, respond
Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez
KENNEDY, ATTORNEY GENERAL, v. MENDOZA-MARTINEZ. No. 2. Argued October 10-11, 1961. Restored to the calendar for reargument April 2, 1962. Reargued December 4, 1962. Decided February 18, 1963. Bruce J. Terris reargued the cause for appellant
Schlude v. Commissioner
SCHLUDE et ux. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. No. 80. Argued December 10, 1962. Decided February 18, 1963. Carl F. Bauersfeld argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs was Robert Ash. Assistant Attorney General Oberdorf
Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
GALLICK v. BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD CO. No. 76. Argued December 10, 1962. Decided February 18, 1963. Marshall I. Nurenberg argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were A. H. Dudnik and Meyer A. Cook. Alexander H. Hadden arg
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.