Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1963 Cases
685 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Riddell v. Monolith Portland Cement Co.
RIDDELL, DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. MONOLITH PORTLAND CEMENT CO. No. 528. Decided January 14, 1963. Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Jones, Ralph S. Spritzer and Melva M. Graney for petitioner. Joseph
Williams v. Zuckert
WILLIAMS v. ZUCKERT, SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE, et al. No. 133. Argued December 13, 1962. Decided January 14, 1963. David I. Shapiro argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Sidney Dickstein. Stephen J. Poliak argued the
Federal Trade Commission v. Sun Oil Co.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. SUN OIL CO. No. 56. Argued November 15, 1962. Decided January 14, 1963. Robert B. Hummel argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, J
Wong Sun v. United States
WONG SUN et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 36. Argued March 29 and April 2, 1962. Restored to calendar for reargument June 4, 1962. Reargued October 8, 1962.— Decided January 14, 1963. Edward Bennett Williams, acting under appointment by the Cou
National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Button
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE v. BUTTON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, et al. No. 5. Argued November 8, 1961. Restored to the calendar for reargument April 2, 1962. Reargued October 9, 1962.— Decided January 14,
Cleary v. Bolger
CLEARY v. BOLGER. No. 57. Argued November 14-15, 1962. Decided January 14, 1963. Irving Malchman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was William P. Sirignano. Joseph Aronstein, by appointment of the Court, post, p. 805,
Shotwell Manufacturing Co. v. United States
SHOTWELL MANUFACTURING CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 16. Argued October 11, 15, 1962. Decided January 14, 1963. George B. Christensen and William T. Kirby argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioners. Assistant Attorney General Ober
Best v. Humboldt Placer Mining Co.
BEST et al. v. HUMBOLDT PLACER MINING CO. et al. No. 52. Argued December 10, 1962. — Decided January 14, 1963. Roger P. Marquis argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Cox, Stephen J. Poliak and A. Don
In re the United States-South America Route Case
In the matter of the United States-South America Route Case Docket 12895
Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. United States
PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS, INC., v. UNITED STATES. No. 23. Argued November 8, 1962. Decided January 14, 1963 David W. Peck argued the cause and filed briefs for Pan American World Airways, Inc., appellant in No. 23 and appellee in No. 47.
United States v. Georgia Public Service Commission
UNITED STATES v. GEORGIA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION. No. 81. Argued October 18, 1962. — Decided January 14, 1963. Solicitor General Cqx argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Loevinger a
Paul v. United States
PAUL, DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE OF CALIFORNIA, et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 19. Argued October 17-18, 1962. — Decided January 14, 1963. John Fourt, Deputy Attorney General of California, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs
Jones v. Cunningham
JONES v. CUNNINGHAM, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT. No. 77. Argued December 3, 1962. — Decided January 14, 1963. Daniel J. Meador argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was F. D. G. Ribble. Reno 8. Harp III, Assistant Attorney
McDowell v. United States
No. 430, Misc. No. 445, Misc. No. 541, Misc. No. 608, Misc. McDowell v. United States, La Rose v. Tahash, Warden, Lipscomb v. United States, Thomas v. Heritage, Warden,
Humphries v. Beto
No. 636, Misc. Humphries v. Beto, Corrections Director, et al.
Bassett v. Tahash
No. 616, Misc. Bassett v. Tahash, Warden.
Burks v. Klinger
No. 606, Misc. Burks v. Klinger, Warden, et al. George Olshausen for petitioner.
Zimmerman v. Board of Education
No. 588. Zimmerman v. Board of Education of Newark et al. Daniel H. Pollitt and Nicholas J. LaRocca for petitioner. Jacob Fox for respondents.
Kaiser v. Price-Fewell, Inc.
No. 612. Kaiser et al. v. Price-Fewell, Inc. Eugene R. Warren and Bruce T. Bullion for petitioners. Pat Mehaffy for respondent.
Welch v. Runge
No. 595. Welch, doing business as Welch Trucking Co., et al. v. Runge. Lucian Touchstone for petitioners.
Whitson v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.
No. 581. Whitson v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland. Petitioner pro se. Frank E. Horka for respondent.
Lynd v. Kennedy
No. 576. Lynd, Registrar of Elections of Forrest County, Mississippi, v. Kennedy, Attorney General. Joe T. Patterson, Attorney General of Mississippi, Dugas Shands, Will S. Wells and Guy N. Rogers, Assistant Attorneys General, Peter M. Stoc
Colton v. United States
No. 560. Colton et al. v. United States. Boris Kostelanetz and George G. Gallantz for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and Joseph M. Howard for the United States.
Lott v. United States
No. 551. Lott et al. v. United States. John H. Crooker, Leroy Den-man Moody, C. Anthony Friloux, Jr., Joe S. Moss, C. W. Wellen and William M.-Ryan for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer, Joseph M. How
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.