Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1964 Cases
641 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Maryland Committee for Fair Representation v. Tawes
MARYLAND COMMITTEE FOR FAIR REPRESENTATION et al. v. TAWES, GOVERNOR OF MARYLAND, et al. No. 29. Argued November 13-14, 1963. Decided June 15, 1964. Alfred L. Scanlan argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief were John B. Wrigh
WMCA, Inc. v. Lomenzo
WMCA, INC., et al. v. LOMENZO, SECRETARY OF STATE OF NEW YORK, et al. No. 20. Argued November 12-13, 1963. Decided June 15, 1964. Leonard B. Sand argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief was Max Gross. Irving Galt, Assistant S
Reynolds v. Sims
REYNOLDS, JUDGE, et al. v. SIMS et al. No. 23. Argued November 13, 1963. Decided June 15, 1964 W. McLean Pitts argued the cause for appellants in No. 23 and for appellees in Nos. 27 and 41. With him on the briefs were Joseph B. Wilkinson, J
Blackman v. California
No. 1355, Misc. Blackman v. California.
Darling v. New York
No. 1302, Misc. Darling v. New York.
Olive v. United States
No. 1278, Misc. Olive v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for.the United States.
Edgar v. United States
No. 1202, Misc. Edgar v. United States. /. J. Kilimnik for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Theodore George Gilinsky for the United States.
Allen v. Oklahoma
No. 1098, Misc. Allen v. Oklahoma. Petitioner pro se. Charles Nesbitt, Attorney General of Oklahoma, and Jack A. Swidensky, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
United States v. Communist Party
No. 1027. United States v. Communist Party of the United States. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Yeagley, Kevin T. Maroney and George B. Searls for the United States. John J. Abt and Joseph Forer for respondent.
Hooper v. Chrysler Motors Corp.
No. 1039. Hooper v. Chrysler Motors Corp. Albert Smith for petitioner. David W. Kendall and Clarence P. Brazill, Jr. for respondent.
Sasser v. United States
No. 983, Misc. Sasser v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox for the United States.
Handelsvennootschap Norma N. V. v. Kennedy
No. 1021. Handelsvennootschap Norma N. V. et al. v. Kennedy, Attorney General, Successor to the Alien Property Custodian, et al. Henry P. de Vries for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Douglas, Sherman L. Cohn a
Keller v. Wisconsin ex rel. State Bar of Wisconsin
No. 749. Keller v. Wisconsin ex rel. State Bar of Wisconsin. Frank M. Coyne for petitioner. George Thompson, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and Warren H. Resh, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. Solicitor General Cox and Robert W.
Kerr. v. Commissioner
No. 942. Kerr et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Harvey N. Black for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and Melva M. Graney for respondent.
Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
No. 610. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board et al. Solicitor General Cox on the motion.
Sica v. United States
June 8, 1964. No. 134. Sica v. United States. Russell E. Parsons and Thomas G. Laughlin on the application for petitioner.
Tacoma Ass'n of Credit Men v. Washington
TACOMA ASSOCIATION OF CREDIT MEN v. WASHINGTON. No. 995. Decided June 8, 1964. Ofell H. Johnson for appellant. John J. O’Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and James A. Furber and Henry W. Wager, Assistant Attorneys General, for appel
Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.
ARO MANUFACTURING CO., INC., et al. v. CONVERTIBLE TOP REPLACEMENT CO., INC. No. 75. Argued February 17, 1964. Decided June 8, 1964. Charles Hieken argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs was David Wolf. Elliott I. Pollock
United States v. Tateo
UNITED STATES v. TATEO. No. 328. Argued April 20, 1964. Decided June 8, 1964. Beatrice Rosenberg argued the cause for the United States. With her on the brief were Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Philip B. Heymann
General Motors Corp. v. Washington
GENERAL MOTORS CORP. v. WASHINGTON et al. No. 115. Argued February 26, 1964. Decided June 8, 1964. Donald K. Barnes argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Aloysius F. Power, Thomas J. Hughes and Dewitt Williams. John W.
J. I. Case Co. v. Borak
J. I. CASE CO. et al. v. BORAK. No. 402. Argued April 22-23, 1964. Decided June 8, 1964. Malcolm K. Whyte argued the cause for petitioner J. I. Case Co. With him on the briefs was Robert P. Harland. Walter S. Davis argued the cause for peti
Wilbur-Ellis Co. v. Kuther
WILBUR-ELLIS CO. et al. v. KUTHER. No. 109. Argued February 20, 1964. Decided June 8, 1964. Frank A. Neal argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief .was James M. Naylor. Carlisle M. Moore argued the cause for respondent. With
Donovan v. City of Dallas
DONOVAN et al. v. CITY OF DALLAS et al. No. 264. Argued April 22, 1964. Decided June 8, 1964. James P. Donovan argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioners. H. P. Kucera argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Cha
Wilson v. United States
No. 112, Misc. Wilson v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.