Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1964 Cases
641 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
White v. California
No. 1233, Misc. White v. California.
Keenan v. Massachusetts
No. 1132, Misc. Keenan v. Massachusetts.
Carter v. United States
No. 992, Misc. Carter v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Robert S. Erdahl and Jerome Nelson for the United States.
Haskell v. United States
No. 989. Haskell v. United States. Irving I. Erdheim and Theodore Krieger for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer, Joseph M. Howard and John M. Brant for the United States.
Gayles v. United States
No. 973. No. 974. No. 975. No. 1288, Misc. Gayles v. United States; Spurlark v. United States; Green v. United States; and Davis et al. v. United States. Charles B. Evins for petitioner in No. 973. Evelyn F. Johnson and Glenn T. Johnson, Sr
King v. Atlantic Coast Line Rairoad
No. 904. King et al. v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. et al. Relejord McGrijj for petitioners. William H. Maness for Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co., and Richard R. Lyman for Grand Lodge Brotherhood Railway Carmen of America, respondent
Tansimore v. United States
No. 1189, Misc. Tansimore v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox for the United States.
Carrington v. Rash
May 25, 1964. No. 1108. Carrington v. Rash et al. W. C. Peticolas on the motion.
Lynchburg Traffic Bureau v. United States
LYNCHBURG TRAFFIC BUREAU v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 931. Decided May 25, 1964. W. G. Burnette for appellant. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Arthur J. Murphy, Jr., Robert W. Ginnane and Thomas H.
Raymond v. Wickham
RAYMOND, doing business as CRESTMARK DAIRY, v. WICKHAM, COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE AND MARKETS, et al. No. 1096, Misc. Decided May 25, 1964.
Rogers v. City of Pine Bluff
ROGERS et al. v. CITY OF PINE BLUFF, ARKANSAS. No. 889. Decided May 25, 1964. Griffin Smith for appellants. John Harris Jones for appellee.
Nagelberg v. United States
NAGELBERG v. UNITED STATES. No. 785. Decided May 25, 1964. Irwin Klein for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
Calhoun v. Latimer
CALHOUN et al. v. LATIMER et al. No. 623. Argued March 31, 1964. Decided May 25, 1964. Constance Baker Motley argued the cause for petitioners. With her on the brief were Jack Greenberg, E. E. Moore, Donald L. Hollowell and A. T. Walden. A.
Local 20, Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Union v. Morton
LOCAL 20, TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS & HELPERS UNION v. MORTON, doing business as LESTER MORTON TRUCKING CO. No. 485. Argued April 29, 1964. Decided May 25, 1964. David Previant argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were David
Massachusetts Trustees of Eastern Gas & Fuel Associates v. United States
MASSACHUSETTS TRUSTEES OF EASTERN GAS & FUEL ASSOCIATES v. UNITED STATES. No. 137. Argued February 24, 1964. Decided May 25, 1964. J. Franklin Fort argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Jose de Varón and T. S. L. Per
Griffin v. County School Board
GRIFFIN et al. v. COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD COUNTY et al. No. 592. Argued March 30, 1964. Decided May 25, 1964. Robert L. Carter argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were S. W. Tucker and Frank D. Reeves. R. D.
Stebbins v. United States
No. 1081, Misc. Stebbins v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Douglas and Morton Hollander for the United States.
McIntosh v. North Carolina
No. 1195, Misc. McIntosh v. North Carolina.
Pollino v. New York
No. 1149, Misc. Pollino v. New York. Benjamin Harmatz for petitioner.
Stacey v. Pate
No. 1044, Misc. Stacey v. Pate, Warden. Gerald W. Getty and James J. Doherty for petitioner.
McKnight v. Beto
No. 760, Misc. McKnight v. Beto, Corrections Director. Petitioner pro se. Waggoner Carr, Attorney-General of Texas, and Howard M. Fender and Alio B. Crow, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
Heuer v. Crescent River Port Pilots Ass'n
No. 925. Heuer v. Crescent River Port Pilots Association. Janet Mary Riley for petitioner. Peter H. Beer for respondent.
Herron v. Portland Collection Bureau
No. 966. Herron v. Portland Collection Bureau et al.
University National Stockholders Protective Committee, Inc. v. University National Life Insurance
No. 963. University National Stockholders Protective Committee, Inc., v. University National Life Insurance Co. et al. Robert L. Taylor for petitioner.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.