Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1964 Cases
641 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Van Rensselaer v. General Motors Corp.
No. 1281, Misc. Van Rensselaer et al. v. General Motors Corp. Frank C. Sibley for petitioners. George W. Coombe, Jr. and Aloysius F. Power for respondent.
Kahigas v. New York
No. 1253, Misc. Kahigas v. New York. Louis Hering for petitioner.
Sorce v. United States
No. 1116, Misc. Sorce v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox for the United States.
Armstrong v. United States
No. 1062, Misc. Armstrong v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox for the United States.
Paccione v. Heritage
No. 898, Misc. Paccione v. Heritage, Warden. Emmet J. Bondurant for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Harold H. Greene and David Rubin for respondent.
Cole v. United States
No. 1002. Cole v. United States. Joseph A. Ball, Max F. Deutz and Herman F. Selvin for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Richard W. Schmude for the United States.
Goldberg v. United States
No. 1008. Goldberg v. United States. Thomas D. McBride and Raymond J. Bradley for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer, Joseph M. Howard and Burton Berkley for the United States.
Guido v. United States
No. 882. No. 883. No. 1052, No. 1146, No. 1155, Misc. Misc. Misc. Guido v. United States; Micele v. United States; Sakal, alias Sacko, v. United States; Pellegrini v. United States; and McGarry v. United States. Julius Lucius Echeles for pe
Easter v. Brune
No. 1228, Misc. Easter v. Brune et al., Judges.
Griffin v. County School Board of Prince Edward County
June 1, 1964. No. 592. Griffin et al. v. County School Board of Prince Edward County et al., Henry L. Marsh III, Robert L. Carter and S. W. Tucker on the motion.
Marder v. Massachusetts
MARDER v. MASSACHUSETTS. No. 819. Decided June 1, 1964. Appellant pro se. Edward W. Brooke, Attorney General of Massachusetts, for appellee.
Zapata v. California
ZAPATA v. CALIFORNIA. No. 1025, Mise. Decided June 1, 1964. Samuel Carter McMorris for appellant. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, and Roger E. Venturi, Deputy Attorney General, for a
Meeks v. Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co.
MEEKS v. GEORGIA SOUTHERN & FLORIDA RAILWAY CO. No. 981. Decided June 1, 1964 Thomas J. Lewis and Thomas J. Lewis, Jr. for petitioner in No. 981. W. Graham Claytor, Jr., Charles J. Bloch, Denmark Groover, Jr. and William H. Allen for respon
Union Oil Co. v. State Board of Equalization
UNION OIL CO. OF CALIFORNIA v. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION OF CALIFORNIA. No. 968. Decided June 1, 1964. Hart H. Spiegel for appellant. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Dan Kaufmann, Assistant Attorney General, and Ernest P. Go
Chamberlin v. Dade County Board of Public Instruction
CHAMBERLIN et al. v. DADE COUNTY BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION et al. No. 939. Decided June 1, 1964. Leo Pfeffer and Howard W. Dixon for appellants. George C. Bolles for appellees.
Hudson Distributors, Inc. v. Eli Lilly & Co.
HUDSON DISTRIBUTORS, INC., v. ELI LILLY & CO. No. 490. Argued April 30, 1964. Decided June 1, 1964 Myron N. Krotinger argued the cause for appellant in both cases. With him on the briefs were Leonard Lane and Morton L. Stone. Ralph M. Carso
Baggett v. Bullitt
BAGGETT et al. v. BULLITT et al. No. 220. Argued March 24, 1964. Decided June 1, 1964. Arval A. Morris and Kenneth A. MacDonald argued the cause and filed a brief for appellants. Herbert H. Fuller, Deputy Attorney General of Washington, arg
United States v. Vermont
UNITED STATES v. VERMONT et al. No. 509. Argued April 21, 1964. Decided June 1, 1964. Daniel M. Friedman argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and Jo
Department of Revenue v. James B. Beam Distilling Co.
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE v. JAMES B. BEAM DISTILLING CO. No. 389. Argued March 23, 1964. Decided June 1, 1964. William, S. Riley, Assistant Attorney General of Kentucky, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were John B. Breck
Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp.
HOSTETTER et al. v. IDLEWILD BON VOYAGE LIQUOR CORP. No. 116. Argued March 23, 1964. Decided June 1, 1964. Irving Galt, Assistant Solicitor General of New York, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were Louis J. Lefkowitz
Red Ball Motor Freight, Inc. v. Shannon
RED BALL MOTOR FREIGHT, INC., et al. v. SHANNON et al., doing business as E. & R. SHANNON. No. 406. Argued April 28, 1964. Decided June 1, 1964 Amos M. Matheivs argued the cause for appellants in No. 406. With him on the briefs were Phillip
National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama ex rel. Flowers
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE v. ALABAMA ex rel. FLOWERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL. No. 169. Argued March 24, 1964. Decided June 1, 1964. Robert L. Carter argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Fred
United States v. Aluminum Co. of America
UNITED STATES v. ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA et al. No. 204. Argued April 23, 1964. Decided June 1, 1964. Solicitor General Cox argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Frank Goodman,
Winter v. Johnston
No. 1261, Misc. Winter v. Johnston, Hospital Director. Petitioner pro se. Louis J. Lejkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, and Anthony J. Lokot, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.