Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1966 Cases
682 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Richardson v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare
RICHARDSON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE. No. 874, Misc. Decided April 18, 1966. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for respondent.
Pope v. Daggett
POPE v. DAGGETT et al. No. 837, Misc. Decided April 18, 1966. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Doar and David L. Norman for respondents.
Long v. Parker
LONG v. PARKER, WARDEN. No. 821, Misc. Decided April 18, 1966. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for respondent.
Hollingshead v. Wainwright
HOLLINGSHEAD v. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR. No. 457, Misc. Decided April 18, 1966. Petitioner pro se. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and James G. Mahorner, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
American Guild of Variety Artists v. Smith
AMERICAN GUILD OF VARIETY ARTISTS v. SMITH, dba SMITH ENTERTAINMENT AGENCY et al. No. 808. Decided April 18, 1966. William Power Maloney for petitioner. Jerome G. Raidt for respondent.
Holt v. Alleghany Corp.
HOLT et al. v. ALLEGHANY CORP. et al. No. 131. Argued March 21, 1966. Decided April 18, 1966. Stuart N. Updike argued the cause for petitioners in both cases. With him on the briefs were Lee W. Meyer, Ronald S. Daniels and Richard J. Barnes
Louisiana v. Mississippi
LOUISIANA v. MISSISSIPPI et al. No. 14, Original. Argued November 16, 1965. Decided April 18, 1966. John L. Madden and Edward M. Carmouche, Assistant Attorneys General of Louisiana, argued on the exceptions to the Report of the Special Mast
Elfbrandt v. Russell
ELFBRANDT v. RUSSELL et al. No. 656. Argued February 24, 1966. Decided April 18, 1966. W. Edward Morgan argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Philip M. Haggerty, Special Counsel to the Attorney General of Arizona, argued the ca
Brookhart v. Janis
BROOKHART v. JANIS, DIRECTOR OF THE OHIO DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HYGIENE AND CORRECTION. No. 657. Argued March 21-22, 1966. Decided April 18, 1966. Gerald A. Messerman, by appointment of the Court, 382 U. S. 899, argued the cause for petitione
Black v. United States
No. 1240, Misc. Black v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
McGruder v. Massachusetts
No. 142, Misc. McGruder v. Massachusetts. Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. Petitioner pro se. Matthew J. Ryan, Jr., for respondent.
Gallegos v. Colorado
No. 836, Misc. Gallegos et al. v. Colorado. H. D. Reed for petitioners. Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, and James W. Creamer, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Logan v. Empresa Lineas Maritimas Argentinas
No. 1052. Logan v. Empresa Lineas Maritimas Argentinas et al. Lawrence F. O’Donnell for petitioner. Seymour P. Edgerton for Empresa Lineas Maritimas Argentinas and Thomas D. Bums for Jarka Corp. of New England, respondents.
Tabas v. Hudson
No. 1022. Tabas v. Hudson. Tobias Simon for petitioner.
Blanchard Importing & Distributing Co. v. Charles Gilman & Son, Inc.
No. 1023. Blanchard Importing & Distributing Co., Inc. v. Charles Gilman & Son, Inc., et al. Harold E. Cole for petitioner.
Lusk v. United States
No. 1014. Lusk et al. v. United States. Isidore H. Wachtel for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Douglas and Alan S. Rosenthal for the United States.
Cichos v. Indiana
No. 850. Cichos v. Indiana. John P. Price and Cleon H. Foust for petitioner. John J. Dillon, Attorney General of Indiana, and Charles S. White for respondent.
Miller v. Rhay
No. 406, Misc. Miller v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent. Petitioner pro se. John J. O’Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Stephen C. Way, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Gojack v. United States
April 4, 1966. No. 594. Gojack v. United States. Melvin L. Wulf on- the motion.
Jenkins v. Maryland
JENKINS v. MARYLAND. No. 605, Mise. Decided April 4, 1966. Petitioner pro se. Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General of Maryland, for respondent.
Estate of Leyman v. Commissioner
ESTATE OF LEYMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. No. 385. Decided April 4, 1966. Daniel M. Gribbon, William, H. Allen and Matthew J. Zinn for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall for respondent.
Miller v. Virginia
MILLER v. VIRGINIA. No. 196, Mise. Decided April 4, 1966. Appellant pro se. Reno S. Harp III, Assistant Attorney General of Virginia, for appellee.
DeGregory v. Attorney General of New Hampshire
DeGREGORY v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. No. 396. Argued February 24, 1966. Decided April 4, 1966. Howard S. Whiteside argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant. R. Peter Shapiro, Assistant Attorney General of New Hampshire, a
De Lago v. New York
No. 1343, Misc. De Lago v. New York.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.