Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1966 Cases
682 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Caraballo v. LaVallee
No. 860, Misc. Caraballo v. LaVallee, Warden. Petitioner pro se. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Arthur L. Schiff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Di Paolo v. New Jersey
No. 203, Misc. Di Paolo v. New Jersey. Petitioner pro se. Michael B. Imbriani and Raymond R. Trombadore, Deputy Attorneys General of New Jersey, for respondent.
E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Maloney
No. 977. No. 1093, Mise. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc. v. Maloney; and Maloney v. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. William H. Allen for petitioner in No. 977 and for respondent in No. 1093, Mise. Henry Lincoln Johnson, Jr., for petitio
Grasberger v. Calissi
No. 1038. Grasberger, Trustee in Bankruptcy, et al. v. Calissi, Executrix, et al. Peter P. Zion for petitioners.
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Ludwig
No. 992. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Ludwig, Guardian, et al. Robert A. Straub for petitioner. John von Batchelder for respondents.
Bruner v. Texas
No. 972. Bruner et ux. v. Texas. Heard L. Floore for petitioners. Wag-goner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, and Hawthorne Phillips, T. B. Wright, Carroll R. Graham, Fred M. Talkington and F. William Colburn, Assistant Attorneys General, fo
Tremont v. United States
No. 945. Tremont, aka Larro v. United States. James F. Schaeffer for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Mervyn Hamburg for the United States.
Tramontana v. Varig Airlines
No. 864. Tramontana v. Varig Airlines. Eugene Gressman and Hyman Smollar for petitioner. Harry A. Bowen and John L. Laskey for respondent.
Costello v. United States
No. 826. Costello v. United States. Ira B. Grudberg for petitioner.
Garrity v. New Jersey
No. 386. Garrity et al. v. New Jersey. Daniel L. O’Connor for appellants. Norman Heine and James G. Aiken for appellee.
County Board of Election v. United States
COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTION OF MONROE COUNTY, NEW YORK, et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 1040. Decided March 21, 1966. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Jean M. Coon, Assistant Attorney General, Ruth Kessler Toch, Acting Solicitor
Bridges v. City of Biloxi
BRIDGES v. CITY OF BILOXI, MISSISSIPPI. No. 923. Decided March 21, 1966. Upton Sisson and Forrest B. Jackson for appellant. L. Arnold Pyle and Albert Sidney Johnston, Jr., for appellee.
Cross v. California
CROSS v. CALIFORNIA. No. 1161, Mise. Decided March 21, 1966.
Malat v. Riddell
MALAT et ux. v. RIDDELL, DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE. No. 487. Argued March 3, 1966. Decided March 21, 1966. George T. Altman argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioners. Jack S. Levin argued the cause for respondent. With h
Kent v. United States
KENT v. UNITED STATES. No. 104. Argued January 19, 1966. Decided March 21, 1966. Myron G. Ehrlich and Richard Arens argued the cause for petitioner. With them on the briefs were Monroe H. Freedman and David Carliner. Theodore George Gilinsk
Brenner v. Manson
BRENNER, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS v. MANSON. No. 58. Argued November 17, 1965. Decided March 21, 1966. Paul Bender argued the cause for petitioner, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Marshal
Mishkin v. New York
MISHKIN v. NEW YORK. No. 49. Argued December 7, 1965. Decided March 21, 1966. Emanuel Redfield argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant. H. Richard Uviller argued the cause for appellee. With him on the brief were Frank S. Hogan and
Ginzburg v. United States
GINZBURG et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 42. Argued December 7, 1965. Decided March 21, 1966. Sidney Dickstein argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs was George Kaujmann. Paul Bender argued the cause for the United States, pr
A Book Named "John Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure" v. Attorney General of Massachusetts
A BOOK NAMED “JOHN CLELAND’S MEMOIRS OF A WOMAN OF PLEASURE” et al. v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 368. Argued December 7-8, 1965. Decided March 21, 1966. Charles Rembar argued the cause and filed briefs for appellants. William I
Bros. Inc. v. Browning Manufacturing Co.
No. 255, October Term, 1963. Bros Incorporated v. Browning Manufacturing Co. et al.,
Overby v. New York
No. 1077, Misc. Overby v. New York.
Perez v. Wainwright
No. 424, Misc. Perez v. Wainwright, Corrections Director. Petitioner pro se. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, James G. Mahorner, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Hearst Corp. v. Local Union No. 24, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
No. 966. Hearst Corp., Baltimore News American Division v. Local Union No. 24, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO. Theodore Sherbow and William A. Agee for petitioner. Thomas X. Dunn for respondent.
W. E. Grace Manufacturing Co. v. Bros. Inc.
No. 915. W. E. Grace Manufacturing Co. et al. v. Bros Inc. Charming L. Richards for petitioners. Andrew E. Carlsen for respondent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.