Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1966 Cases
682 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Hicks v. District of Columbia
HICKS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 51. Argued October 21, 1965. Decided February 28, 1966. Reported below: See 197 A. 2d 154. Charles W. Wolfram argued the cause for petitioner, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court. With him on the brief
Stevens v. Marks
STEVENS v. MARKS, NEW YORK SUPREME COURT JUSTICE. No. 210. Argued January 24, 1966. Decided February 28, 1966. John P. Schofield and Eugene Gressman argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner in both cases. H. Richard Uviller argued t
Accardi v. Pennsylvania Railroad
ACCARDI et al. v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO. No. 280. Argued January 20, 1966. Decided February 28, 1966. Richard A. Posner argued the cause for petitioners, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court. With him on the brief were Solicitor Gener
Carnation Co. v. Pacific Westbound Conference
CARNATION CO. v. PACIFIC WESTBOUND CONFERENCE et al. No. 20. Argued November 8, 1965. Decided February 28, 1966. Arthur B. Dunne argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was James R. Baird, Jr. Edward D. Ransom argued the cau
Swann v. Adams
SWANN et al. v. ADAMS, SECRETARY OF STATE OF FLORIDA, et al. No. 973. Decided February 25, 1966. D. P. S. Paul, P. D. Thomson, Neal Rutledge, Richard F. Wolfson, Thomas C. Britton and Stuart Simon for appellants. Earl Faircloth, Attorney Ge
Idaho Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. Wirtz
IDAHO SHEET METAL WORKS, INC. v. WIRTZ, SECRETARY OF LABOR. No. 30. Argued December 8, 1965. Decided February 24, 1966. Eli A. Weston argued the cause for petitioner in No. 30. On the brief was T. H. Eberle. Bessie Margolin argued the cause
United States v. Johnson
UNITED STATES v. JOHNSON. No. 25. Argued November 10 and 15, 1965. Decided February 24, 1966. Beatrice Rosenberg argued the cause for the United States. With her on the briefs were Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vins
Brown v. Louisiana
BROWN et al. v. LOUISIANA. No. 41. Argued December 6, 1965. Decided February 23, 1966. Carl Rachlin argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Robert F. Collins, Nils R. Douglas, Murphy W. Bell, Floyd McKissick and Marvin
United States v. Ewell
UNITED STATES v. EWELL et al. No. 29. Argued November 18, 1965. Decided February 23, 1966. Ralph S. Spritzer argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice R
Baxstrom v. Herold
BAXSTROM v. HEROLD, STATE HOSPITAL DIRECTOR. No. 219. Argued December 9, 1965. Decided February 23, 1966. Leon B. Polsky argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Anthony J. Lokot, Assistant Attorney General of New York, argued the
Muth v. Atlass
No. 709. No. 733. Muth, Administratrix v. Atlass et al., Executors; and Darr, Administratrix v. Atlass et al., Executors,
Howell v. Oregon
No. 336, Misc. Howell v. Oregon. Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. Petitioner pro se. Robert J. Elfers for respondent.
Cross v. Kenton
No. 1103, Misc. Cross v. Kenton, Warden. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for respondent.
DeMary v. Pate
No. 1055, Misc. DeMary v. Pate, Warden.
Rhodes v. Jones
No. 1019, Misc. Rhodes v. Jones.
Nelson v. Illinois
No. 994, Misc. Nelson v. Illinois. Sam Adam for petitioner.
Coleman v. California
No. 950, Misc. Coleman v. California.
Smith v. Idaho
No. 894, Misc. Smith v. Idaho et al. Petitioner pro se. Allan G. Shepard, Attorney General of Idaho, and M. Allyn Din-gel, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.
Oliver v. Attorney General of the United States
No. 833, Misc. Oliver v. Attorney General of the United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Door, and David L. Norman for the United States.
Crow v. Missouri
No. 660, Misc. Crow v. Missouri. Petitioner pro se. Norman H. Anderson, Attorney General of Missouri, and Howard L. McFadden and Gerald L. Birnbaum, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
2000 Plastic Tubular Cases v. United States
No. 859. 2000 Plastic Tubular Cases et al. v. United States. Petitioner Knox pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
Emory v. California
No. 962. Emory et ux. v. California. Burton Marks for petitioners.
Robinson v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.
No. 895. Robinson et al. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co. et al. W. E. Morse for petitioners.
Glazer v. Bove
No. 879. Glazer v. Bove. Louis B. Fine and Howard I. Legum for petitioner. William M. Harris and Terry H. Davis, Jr., for respondent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.