Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
Intellectual Property Cases
2,623 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
American Steel Foundries v. Robertson
AMERICAN STEEL FOUNDRIES v. ROBERTSON, COMMISSIONER, et al. CERTIFICATE FROM I’HE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 156. Argued November 16, 17, 1925. Decided January 4, 1926. 1. The mere fact that one person has adopted
White v. Mechanics Securities Corp.
WHITE, TREASURER, et al. v. MECHANICS SECURITIES CORPORATION. UNITED STATES v. SECURITIES CORPORATION GENERAL. WHITE, TREASURER, et al. v. SECURITIES CORPORATION GENERAL. UNITED STATES v. EQUITABLE TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK. HICKS, ALIEN PR
Work v. Louisiana
WORK, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, v. LOUISIANA. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 5. Argued October 6, 1925. Decided November 23, 1925. 1. A suit by a State to restrain the Secretary of the'Interior' from reje
Concrete Appliances Co. v. Gomery
CONCRETE APPLIANCES COMPANY et al. v. GOMERY et al. CERTIORARI TO THE circuit 'COURT OF APPEALS FOR , THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 44. Argued October 14, 15, 1925. Decided November 16, 1925. 1. Concurrent findings of the District Court and Circui
Stilz v. United States
STILZ v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 38. Argued October 13, 14, 1925. Decided November 16, 1925. A finding by the Court of Claims that claimant’s patents were not infringed by the Government is a- finding of fact and
Anderson v. Clune
ANDERSON v. CLUNE. ON CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 331. Submitted October 5, 1925. Decided November 16, 1925. A soldier’s additional homestead right (Rev. Stats. § 2306) is an inheritable property
Enrique Del Pozo Y Marcos v. Wilson Cypress Co.
ENRIQUE DEL POZO Y MARCOS et al. v. WILSON CYPRESS COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 184. Motion submitted October 5, 1925. Decided November 16, 1925. 1. An appeal from a decree of the Circuit Gour
Edward Hines Yellow Pine Trustees v. Martin
EDWARD HINES YELLOW PINE TRUSTEES v. ANNA F. C. MARTIN ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 363. Argued May 1, 1925. Decided May 25, 1925. 1. Where a construction of a state statute affecting title to
United States v. Dickey
UNITED STATES v. DICKEY ET AL. ERROR TO THE. DISTRICT COURT. OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OP MISSOURI. No. 768. Argued April 16, 17, 1925. Decided May 25, 1925. 1. Assuming that no constitutional right of the tax-payer is i
Oklahoma v. Texas
STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. STATE OF TEXAS, UNITED STATES, INTERVENER. IN EQUITY. No. 13, Original. Argued April 20, 1925. Decided May 11, 1925. 1. Description of a boundary in field notes and patent as “up the river ”, construed, in the light of
Cooke v. United States
COOKE v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE . FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 311. Argued March 20, 1925. Decided April 13, 1925. 1. On the day following a trial in the District Court in which a verdict had been rendered a
Wells v. Bodkin
WELLS, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF CHARLES E. WELLS, DECEASED, v. BODKIN ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 144. Argued March 6, 1925. Decided April 13, 1925. The Act of May 14, 1880, confers a pr
Barclay & Co. v. Edwards
BARCLAY & COMPANY, INCORPORATED v. EDWARDS, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE SECOND DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR' THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 547. Argued November 24, 1924. Decid
Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Formica Insulation Co.
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC & MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. FORMICA INSULATION COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 102. Argued October 22, 23, 1924. Decided December 8, 1924. 1. An assignment of a patent, or
Terminal Railroad Ass'n v. United States
TERMINAL RAILROAD ASSOCIATION OF ST. LOUIS ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 115. Argued March 3, 4, 1924. Decided October 13, 1924. 1. Certain railw
William R. Warner & Co. v. Eli Lilly & Co.
WILLIAM R. WARNER & COMPANY v. ELI LILLY & COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 32. Argued April 28, 29, 1924. Decided June 9, 1924. 1. Names which are merely descriptive of the ingredients, qualiti
Idaho Irrigation Co. v. Gooding
IDAHO IRRIGATION COMPANY, LTD., ET AL. v. GOODING ET AL. GOODING ET AL. v. IDAHO IRRIGATION COMPANY, LTD., ET AL. APPEALS PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 324 and 336. Argued April 11, 14, 1924. Decided June 9,
Oklahoma v. Texas
STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. STATE OF TEXAS. UNITED STATES, INTERVENER. IN' EQUITY. No. 15, Original. Order fixing time for filing suggestions, etc., entered May 5, 1924; argued on suggestions, etc., May 26, 1924. Decided June 9, 1924. 1. Where a r
United States v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.
UNITED STATES v. TITLE INSURANCE & TRUST COMPANY ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 358. Argued February 28, 1924. Decided June 9, 1924. 1. Where there are two grounds upon either of which an appellat
Thomson Spot Welder Co. v. Ford Motor Co.
THOMSON SPOT WELDER COMPANY v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 120. Argued December 5, 1923. Decided June 2, 1924. 1. The question whether an improvement in the arts involved inventi
Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. City of San Francisco
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO. PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL. PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRIC
Swendig v. Washington Water Power Co.
SWENDIG ET AL. v. WASHINGTON WATER POWER COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 142. Argued February 21, 1924. Decided May 26, 1924. 1. The Act of March 3, 1901, providing for granting rights of way for
United States ex rel. Baldwin Co. v. Robertson
UNITED STATES EX RELATIONE THE BALDWIN COMPANY v. ROBERTSON, AS COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS, AND R. S. HOWARD COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. No. 251. Argued April 29, 1924. Decided May 26, 1924. 1. A decr
Webster Electric Co. v. Splitdorf Electrical Co.
WEBSTER ELECTRIC COMPANY v. SPLITDORF ELECTRICAL COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 93. Argued March 6, 7, 1924. Decided April 7, 1924. 1. Upon a review by certiorari, the Court is not called up
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.