Find court opinions that match your case.

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1923

Crown Die & Tool Co. v. Nye Tool & Machine Works

CROWN DIE & TOOL COMPANY v. NYE TOOL & MACHINE WORKS. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 240. Argued January 17, 18, 1923. Decided February 19, 1923. 1. A suit based on an alleged assignment of a patent

261 U.S. 24 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1923

Concrete Steel Co. v. Vandenburgh

CONCRETE STEEL COMPANY v. VANDENBURGH. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE SECOND circuit; No. 238. Argued January 17, 1923. Decided February 19, 1923. Decided upon the grounds expressed in Vandenburgh v. Truscon Steel Co., a

261 U.S. 16 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1923

Vandenburgh v. Truscon Steel Co.

VANDENBURGH v. TRUSCON STEEL COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 273. Argued January 17, 1923. Decided February 19, 1923. 1. A patent cannot be extended by reissue to a field beyond its original in

261 U.S. 6 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed Intellectual Property 1923

Foley v. United States

FOLEY, ADMINISTRATRIX OF GATHMANN, v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 203. Argued January 12, 1923. Decided January 29, 1923. 1. G wrote to the Navy Department, with respect to his invention for drying materials, that, i

260 U.S. 667 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1923

United States v. Lane

UNITED STATES v. LANE ET AL. UNITED STATES v. GULF REFINING COMPANY OF LOUISIANA. UNITED STATES v. SOUTHWESTERN GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY ET AL. UNITED STATES v. GULF REFINING COMPANY OF LOUISIANA. UNITED STATES v. GREENE ET AL. UNITED STATES

260 U.S. 662 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1923

Oklahoma v. Texas

STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. STATE OF TEXAS. UNITED STATES, INTERVENER. IN EQUITY. No. 18, Original. Argued April 25, 26, 27, 1922 Decided January 15, 1923. 1. The boundary line between the States of Texas and Oklahoma along the Red River, as deter

260 U.S. 606 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1923

Jeems Bayou Fishing & Hunting Club v. United States

JEEMS BAYOU FISHING & HUNTING CLUB ET AL v. UNITED STATES. UNITED STATES v. JEEMS BAYOU HUNTING & FISHING CLUB ET AL. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. ■ Nos. 119 and 137. Argued November 21, 22, 1922. Decided

260 U.S. 561 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1923

Stockley v. United States

STOCKLEY ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 74. Argued November 20, 1922. Decided January 2, 1923. 1. Section 7 of the Act of March 3, 1891, c. 561, 26 Stat. 1099, applicable to home

260 U.S. 532 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1922

Cox v. Hart

COX v. HART. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE NINTH CIRCUIT; No. 71. Argued November 16, 1922. Decided December 11, 1922. 1. What will constitute possession of a tract of land depends largely upon its character and condition

260 U.S. 427 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1922

United States v. Oregon Lumber Co.

UNITED STATES v. OREGON LUMBER COMPANY ET AL. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 40. Argued October 9, 1922. Decided November 27, 1922. Where the Government sued to annul land patents upon the ground of

260 U.S. 290 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1922

United States v. Atkins

UNITED STATES v. MINNIE ATKINS ET AL. NANCY ATKINS ET AL. v. UNITED STATES, MINNIE FOLK, NÉE ATKINS, ET AL. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 45, 46. Argued October 11, 12, 1922. Decided November 20, 192

260 U.S. 220 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1922

Wyoming v. Colorado

STATE OF WYOMING v. STATE OF COLORADO ET AL. IN EQUITY. No. 3, Original. Argued December 6, 7, 8, 1916; restored to docket for reargument March 6, 1917; reargued January 9, 10, 11, 1918; restored to docket for reargument June 6, 1921; rearg

259 U.S. 419 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed Intellectual Property 1922

Federal Baseball Club of Baltimore, Inc. v. National League of Professional Baseball Clubs

FEDERAL BASEBALL CLUB OF BALTIMORE, INC. v. NATIONAL LEAGUE OF PROFESSIONAL BASEBALL CLUBS, ET AL. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 204. Argued April 19, 1922. Decided May 29, 1922. 1. The business of providing

259 U.S. 200 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1922

Santa Fe Pacific Railroad v. Fall

SANTA FE PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. FALL, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Nos. 108, 109. Argued January 24, 1922. Decided May 29, 1922. The Act of April 28, 1904, ,c. 1810, § 1, 33

259 U.S. 197 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1922

Union Tool Co. v. Wilson

UNION TOOL COMPANY v. WILSON. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 132. Argued March 1, 2, 1922. Decided May 15, 1922. 1. Upon an application of the plaintiff in a pending suit charging the defendant with se

259 U.S. 107 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1922

Oklahoma v. Texas

STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. STATE OF TEXAS. UNITED STATES, INTERVENER. IN EQUITY. No. 20, Original. Argued December 13, 14, 1921. Decided May 1, 1922. 1. When this court, in ap. original suit involving title to land claimed by two States against e

258 U.S. 574 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1922

United Shoe Machinery Corp. v. United States

UNITED SHOE MACHINERY CORPORATION ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT- COURT OP THE UNITED.STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP MISSOURI. No. 119. Argued March 7, 8, 9, 1921; restored to docket for reargument June 6, 1921; rearg

258 U.S. 451 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1922

Standard Fashion Co. v. Magrane-Houston Co.

STANDARD FASHION COMPANY v. MAGRANE-HOUSTON COMPANY. CEBTIOBABI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 20. Argued January 25, 1921; restored to docket for reargument April 11, 1921; reargued January. 16, 1922. Decided Ap

258 U.S. 346 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1922

Irwin v. Wright

IRWIN v. WRIGHT, COUNTY TREASURER OF MARICOPA COUNTY, STATE OF ARIZONA, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. No. 110. Submitted January 24, 1022. Decided March 20, 1922. ]. A suit to enjoin

258 U.S. 219 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed Intellectual Property 1922

Atchafalaya Land Co. v. F. B. Williams Cypress Co.

ATCHAFALAYA LAND COMPANY, LIMITED, ET AL. v. F. B. WILLIAMS CYPRESS COMPANY, LIMITED. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP LOUISIANA. No. 106. Argued March 3, 1922. Decided March 13, 1922. A statute limiting the time within which acti

258 U.S. 190 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1922

John Simmons Co. v. Grier Bros.

JOHN SIMMONS COMPANY v. GRIER BROTHERS COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE ' ' THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 57. Argued November 8, 1921. Decided February 27, 1922. 1. A bill of review is called for only after a final decree «a

258 U.S. 82 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1921

Kern River Co. v. United States

KERN RIVER COMPANY ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ' NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 50. Argued October 20, 21, 1921. Decided November 21, 1921. 1. A right of way through public lands or reservations, obtained t

257 U.S. 147 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed Intellectual Property 1921

Marine Railway & Coal Co. v. United States

MARINE RAILWAY & COAL COMPANY, INC. v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. No. 45. Argued October 18, 1921. Decided November 7, 1921. 1. The jurisdiction of this court to review judgments of the Court o

257 U.S. 47 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1921

Hildreth v. Mastoras

HILDRETH v. MASTORAS. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRQUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR-THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 51. Argued October 21, 1921. Decided November 7, 1921. 1. The presumption of priority and novelty which arises from the granting of a patent has gre

257 U.S. 27 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion