Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1851 Cases
96 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Pennsylvania v. Wheeling & Belmont Bridge Co.
The State of Pennsylvania, Complainant, v. The Wheeling and Belmont Bridge Company, William Otterson and George Croft. The State of Pennsylvania having constructed lines of canal and railroad, and other means of travel and transportation, w
Jecker v. Montgomery
Juan Bautista Jecker, Luis Jecker, Thomas de la Torre, Geidero de la Torre, and Jose E. Fernandez, Merchants, trading, under the name and style of Jecker, Torre & Company, Appellants, v. John B. Montgomery. — And John B. Montgomery, Appella
Lawrence v. Caswell
Cornelius W. Lawrence, Plaintiff in error, v. John Caswell and Solomon T. Caswell. By the Tariff of 1846, the duty of one hundred per cent., ad valorem, upon brandy, - ought to be charged only upon the quantity actually imported, and not on
United States v. Hodge
The United States, Plaintiffs in error, v. Andrew Hodge, Jr. and Levi Pierce. In a suit upon a postmaster’s bond, when treasury transcripts are offered in evidence, ic is not necessary that they should contain the statements of credits clai
Pillow v. Roberts
Jerome B. Pillow, Plaintiff in error, v. Truman Roberts. Where a deed, executed iu Wisconsin, and attested by tbe seat of a court, stamped upon tbe paper, instead of wax or a wafer, was offered in evidence upon a trial in • Arkansas, it was
Goodall v. Tucker
Charles P Goodall, Plaintiff in error, v. Joseph W. Tucker, Executor of Abner Robinson, deceased. The principles laid down in the preceding case of Hill'w. Tucker, again affirmed. This case, like the preceding one, of Hill v. Tucker, was br
Hill v. Tucker
Catharine Hill, Plaintiff in error, v. Joseph W. Tucker, Executor of Abner Robinson, deceased. The relations or privity between executors and their testators in Louisiana, do not differ from those which exist at common law. The interest of
McAfee v. Crofford
Morgan McAfee, Madison McAfee, and James Alford, Plaintiffs in error, v. James T. Crofford. In an action of trespass, for forcibly invading a plantation, carrying off "some slaves, and frightening others away, it was proper for the plaintif
Rogers v. Lindsey
Lewis Rogers, Appellant, v. Joseph G. Lindsey, Henry S. Atwood, and John S. Bennett. The following paper, viz. “The Piesident or Cashier of the Planters and .Merchants Bank will please jiold, subject to the order of Mr. J. G. Lindsey, all t
Norris v. Crocker
John Norris, Plaintiff, v. Edwin B. Crocker and Elisha Egbert. The fourth section of the act of Congress, approved on the 12th day of February, 1793, (1 Stat. at Large, 302,) entitled “An act respecting fugitives escaping from justice, and
Howard v. Ingersoll
John H. Howard, Plaintiff in error, v. Stephen M. Ingersoll ; John H. Howard and Josephus Eckolls, Plaintiffs in error, v. Stephen M. Ingersoll. In 1802, when Georgia ceded her .back lands to the United States, she had jurisdiction over the
Fowler v. Hart
Joseph Fowler, Junior, Appellant, v. Nathan Hart. Beal property, in'Louisiana, was bound by a judicial mortgage. The owners of--the property then took the benefit of the Bankrupt Act of the United States. A creditor of the bankrupt then fil
Day v. Woodworth
Horace H. Day, Plaintiff in error, v. W. James Woodworth, Miller Turner, William W. Pynchorn, Robert L. Fuller, Andrew Sisson, Harvey Clemence, Thomas Bolton, Merret Bristol, Joseph Bowen, Andrew Elmandorf, Seth G. Pope, Edward Gorham, Ephr
Very v. Levy
Martin Very, Appellant, v. Jonas Levy. In equity; where a creditor agrees to receive specific articles in satisfaction of a debt, . even although it be a debt upon bond, secured by mortgage, he will be held to the performance of his agreeme
Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore Railroad v. Howard
The Philadelphia, Wilmington, and Baltimore Railroad Company, Plaintiffs in error, v. Sebre Howard. In Maryland, thu clerk of a connty court was properly admitted to prove the verity of a copy of the docket-entries máde by him as clerk, bec
Tremlett v. Adams
Thomas Tremlett, Plaintiff in error, v. Joseph T. Adams. The .tariff law' of July 30,1846 (9 Stat. at Large, 42.) reduced the duties on imported coal, and was to take effect on the 2d of December, 1846. The sixth section provided thdt all g
Taylor v. Doe ex dem. Miller
Washington and Sanders Taylor, Plaintiffs in error, v. John Doe, ex dem. Austin Miller. By the laws of Mississippi, deeds of trust and mortgages are valid, as against creditors, and purchasers only from the time when they are recorded. A ju
Walsh v. Rogers
John Walsh, Edward Walsh, and Dickinson B. Morehead, owners of the Steamboat Iowa, Appellants, v. Patrick Rogers, Thomas Sherlock, John B. Simmons, Edward Montgomery, John W. Baker, and P. A. Anshute, Claimants of the Steamboat Declaration,
De Forest v. Lawrence
William W. De Forest, George F. Thomas, and Robert W. Rodman, Plaintiffs in error, v. Cornelius W. Lawrence, late Collector of New York. The tariff law of 1846, passed on the 30th of July, (9 Stat. at Large, 42,) contains no special mention
Neves v. Scott
William Neves and James C. Neves, Appellants, v. William H. Scott and Thomas N. Beall, Administrators of William F. Scott, deceased, and George W. Rowell and Lawrence G. Rowell, Executors of Richard Rowell, deceased. The courts of the Unite
de Vilemont v. United States
The Heirs of Don Carlos de Vilemont, Appellants, v. The United States. In 1795, Baron de Carondelet, the Governor-General of Xouisiana, made a grant of land on the Mississippi Kiver, upon condition that a road and clearing should be made wi
Glenn v. United States
John Glenn and Charles M. Thruston, Appellants, v. The United States. In 1796, when Delassus was commandant of the port of New Madrid, he exercised the powers of sub-delegate, and had authority, under the instructions of the Governor-Genera
Campbell v. Doe ex dem. Trustees & Treasurer of Original Surveyed Township
John Campbell, William Ellison, George Steece, and Hiram Campbell, Plaintiffs in error, v. John Doe, ex dem. the Trustees and Treasurer of Original Surveyed Township, No. 1, in Range No. 19, &c. On the 20th of May, 1826, Congress passed an
Tyler v. Black
Cyril C. Tyler, and his wife, Sarah P. Tyler, Appellants, v. George N. Black. Where a person desired to purchase land from a party who was ignorant that he had any title to it, or where the land was situated; and the purchaser made ftaridul
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.