Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1851 Cases
96 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United States v. Hughes
The United States, Appellants, v. Joseph Hughes. The court again decides, as in the preceding ease, that where a Spanish grant was made in 1798, and no evidence was offered that possession was taken under the grant, nor any claim of right o
United States v. Hughes
The United States, Appellants, v. Joseph Hughes. Where a grant of land, in Iiouisiána, was made by the Spanish governor, in Febrn ary 1799, 'but no possession was ever taken by the grantee, during the existence of the Spanish government, or
Gaines v. Relf
Myra Clark Gaines, Appellant, v. Richard Relf, and Beverly Chew, Executors of Daniel Clark and others. Myra Clark Gaines filed a bill in chancery, alleging her claim to certain property upon the ground that Clark, who died seized of'the pro
Fretz v. Bull
Ralph S. and John Fretz, Appellants, v. John C. Bull, William J. M’Clure, and Thomas S. Foreman, Partners, trading under the name and style of J. C. Bull & Co., for the use of the Firemen’s Insurance Company of Louisville. The extent of the
Propeller Genesee Chief v. Fitzhugh
The Propeller Genesee Chief, her Tackle, Apparel, and Furniture, William L. Pierce, Master, Alexander Kelsey, William H. Cheney, William Hunter, Lansing B. Swan, George R. Clark, and Elisha B. Strong, Appellants, v. Henry Fitzhugh, De Witt
United States v. Castant
The United States, Appellants, v. Jeannette Caroline Castant, Widow in community of Jacob Brandegee, deceased, and natural tutrix of her minor children, viz.: Odile Madeline, Camillus John, Stephaine, Marie Henrietta Brandegee, and of Carol
United States v. LeBlanc
The United States, Appellants, v. Constance LeBlanc, Modeste LeBlanc, Louis LeBlanc, Aspasia LeBlanc, Joseph Leon and Raphael Broissard, legal Representatives and Heirs at law of Pierre LeBlanc, deceased. A paper, offered as a grant from th
United States v. Simon
The United States, Appellants, v. Edward Simon. In 1791 Miro granted an order of survey for some land in Louisiana. During the ten years that the provinee4remained in the hands of Spain, the grantee neither had a survey, nor took possession
United States v. Porche
The United States, Appellants, Alexis Porche. The aqt of Congress passed on 56th, May, 1824, enabling claimants-to land in Missouri arid Arkansas, to try their titles, was revived by the act of 17th Jane, 1844, and extended to Louisiana: By
Linton v. Stanton
Duncan Linton, Charlotte Linton and her Husband, Francis Surgette, Stephen Duncan Guardian of Mary Linton and John Linton Minors, Plaintiffs in error, v. Frederick Stanton. Where the highest court of a State decided in favor of a defendant
Snead v. M'Coull
Jesse Snead, late High Sheriff of Henrico County, and as such, Administrator de bonis non of Albert Seekamp, deceased, Appellant, v. Julia M’Coull, Widow of Neil M’Coull, Charles L. M’Coull, Administrator de bonis non of Neil M’Coull, and t
Dinsman v. Wilkes
Samuel Dinsman, Plaintiff in Error, v. Charles Wilkes. Under the Act of Congress, passed on the 2d of March, 1837, (5 Stat. at Barge 153,) the commander of a squadron had power to detain a marine after the term of his enlistment expired, if
Saltmarsh v. Tuthill
Alanson Saltmarsh v. James W. Tuthill. Where an appeal was taken in a common-law case instead of a writ of- error, and after the lapse of ten days the plaintiff issued an execution upon his judgment, and the defendant then sued out a writ o
Phineas O. v. State Bank
Phineas O., Nabby, Jabez and Benjamin B. Sargeant, heirs of Samuel Sargeant, Plaintiffs in error, v. The State Bank of Indiana. By the strict rules of the common law, a bond of conveyance might be adduced in support of a possession of twent
Bennett v. Butterworth
John H. Bennett and E. P. Hunt, Administrators of John D. Amis, deceased, Appellants, v. Samuel F. Butterworth, and Mary Emily, his wife. Where slaves are in the possession of a mortgagee, who renders an account of the profits of their labo
United States v. Reid
The United States, Plaintiffs, v. Thomas Reid and Edward Clements. Where two persons were jointly indicted for an offence committed against the United States, viz., a murder committed upon the high seas, and were tried separately, it was no
Rich v. Lambert
Abraham Rich and James Harris, claimants of the Ship Martha, her tackle, apparel, and furniture, Appellant, v. Charles Lambert and Robert Lambert, copartners, trading under the firm of Lambert and Brother, and others. Same v. South Carolina
New Orleans Canal & Banking Co. v. Stafford
New Orleans Canal and Banking Company, Appellants, v. Josiah S. Stafford and Jenanetta Kirkland, his Wife. The principles established in the preceding case of the Union Bank of Louisiana, against Stafford and wife, again affirmed. This was
Smyth v. Strader, Pevine, & Co.
Samuel Smyth v. Strader, Pevine, & Co. If a-writ of error does not set out the names of all the parties to the judgment of the Circuit Court, the case will be dismissed. This was a writ of error from the Southern District of Ala bama. Mr. P
Cooley v. Board of Wardens
Aaron B. Cooley, Plaintiff in Error, v. The Board of Wardens of the Port of Philadelphia, to the use of the Society for the Relief of distressed Pilots, their Widows and Children, Defendants. Same v. Same. A law of the State of Pennsylvania
Achison v. Huddleson
James C. Achison, Plaintiff in error, v. Jonathan Huddleson. Under an act passed by the State of Maryland, and an assent given to it by Congress, no toll could be levied, for passing over the Cumberland Road, upon coaches which carried the
Teal v. Felton
William W. Teal, Plaintiff in error, v. Mary C. Felton, by her next friend, Charles T. Hicks. The 13th and,30th sections of the act of Congress, passed in 1825, (4 Stat. at Large, 105 - 111,) forbid a writing or memorandum from being writte
Clark v. Barnwell
Tristram Clark, Royal Williams, Ebenezer McLellan, Thomas McLellan, and James R. S. Williams, Claimants of the Barque Susan W. Lind, Appellants, v. Nathaniel Barnwell and James Ravenel, Copartners trading under the firm of Barnwell & Ravene
Dundas v. Hitchcock
James Dundas, Mordecai D. Lewis, Samuel W. Jones, Robert L. Pittfield, and Robert Howell, Appellants, v. Anne Hitchcock. Where a mortgage was executed by a husband, his own name only being used in the body of the instrument, but it was sign
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.