Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1851 Cases
96 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Bond v. Brown
Joshua B. Bond, Administrator of Mary Ann Cade, Plaintiff in error, v. James Brown. By the Louisiana practice, if neither party claims a trial hy jury, the whole case is ' decided hy the court; matters of fact as well as of law. Where, upon
United States v. Wilkinson
The United States, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Joseph B. Wilkinson, Christopher Roselius, John L. Lewis, Louis Bringier, Mandeville Marigny, and John R. Grymes. Where the hill of exceptions purported to have been taken at April term, 1848, but
Lyman v. President of the Bank of the United States
Wyllys Lyman, George P. Marsh, John Peck, and John H. Peck, Plaintiffs in Error, v. The President, Directors, and Company of the Bank of the United States. Whore persons were indebted to a bank and gave their promissory notes for the amount
United States v. Moore
The United States, Appellants, v. Michael Moore. An historical account given as to what officer in Louisiana possessed the power to grant part of the king’s domain. In September, 1797, Morales, who was intendant, had not the power. And a re
Erwin v. Parham
Andrew Erwin, Appellant, v. William S. Parham, James Dick, and Henry R. W. Hill. Where a bill in chancery states that, at an execution sale, which was a'ieged to have been open and fair, the complainant purchased, for the sum of $600, certa
Wilbur v. Almy
Peleg Wilbur, appellant, v. Samson Almy. Where there were two trustees of the property of insolvents, and one of them made an assignment, but the other neither joined in it nor assented to it afterwards, the assignment was void. And in the
Bein v. Heath
Mary Bein, and Richard Bein, her Husband, G. S. Hawkins, and James M’Masters, Plaintiffs in error, v. Mary Heath. The proper condition of an injunction-bond is “ to answer all damages which the defendant may sustain in consequence of the in
Grand Gulf Railroad & Banking Co. v. Marshall
The Grand Gulf Railroad and Banking Company, and Alfred Ingraham and George Read, Assignees of said Company, Intervenors, Plaintiffs in Error, v. John R. Marshall. In order to bring a case within the reviewing po-vyer of this court, as pres
Ives v. Merchants Bank
Moses B. Ives, Plaintiff in error, v. The Merchants Bank of Boston. The surety for the appellants from a decree in admiralty gave bond to pay all costs and damages which might be adjudged by this court. This court having affirmed the decree
Russell v. Southard
Gilbert C. Russell, Appellant, v. Daniel R. Southard, Samuel D. Tompkins, and William C. Bullett and William H. Pope, Administrators of James Burks, deceased, William L. Thompson, Guardian to James Burks, Samuel Burks, Charles Burks, and Na
Dorsey v. Packwood
Greenberry Dorsey, Complainant and Appellant, v. Samuel Packwood. An agreement, whereby the purchaser of a plantation “bound himself to transfer to his son-in-law one half of the plantation, slaves, cattle, and stock, as soon as the son-in-
Williams v. Oliver
Nathaniel Williams, as permanent Trustee for the Creditors of John Gooding, an Insolvent Debtor, v. Charles Oliver, Robert M. Gibbes, and Thomas Oliver, Executors of Robert Oliver, and John Glenn and David M. Perrine, Trustees. The decision
Williams v. Oliver
Nathaniel Williams, as permanent Trustee for the Creditors of James Williams, an Insolvent Debtor, Plaintiff in error, v. Charles Oliver, Robert M. Gibbes, and Thomas Oliver, Executors of Robert Oliver, and John Glenn, and David M. Perine,
Neilson v. Lagow
Hall Neilson, (United States) Plaintiff in error, v. Clark B. Lagow, David H. Lagow, and Elizabeth S. Lagow, Children and Devisees of Wilson Lagow, deceased. The act of Congress, passed on 1st May, 1820, (3 Stat. at Targe, 568,) enacts, “ T
United States v. Bromley
The United States, Plaintiffs, in error, v. Daniel H. Bromley. The act of Congress passed on the 3d of March, 1845, (5 Stat. at Large, 736, ) forbids the transportation of letters, packages, or other mailable matter, except such, as may hav
Harris v. Runnels
John L. Harris, surviving partner of Rowan and Harris, v. Hiram G. Runnels. "Where a defendant, when sued upon a note, set up, as a defence, that the note was given for an illegal consideration,' the whole statute must be examined in order
Lessieur v. Price
Godfrey Lessieur, Abram Augustine and Mary W. his Wife, Thomas H. Dawson, Richard J. Watson and Sarah his Wife, and Palmelia E. Dawson, Laura A. Dawson and George W. Dawson, Infants, by Thomas H. Dawson their Guardian, Plaintiffs in Error,
President of the Farmers' Bank v. Groves
The President, Directors, and Company of the Farmers’ Bank of Virginia, Appellants, v. Horace H. Groves, Administrator of Moses Groves, Deceased. The principles of law decided in this case are so dependent upon the facts that a succinct sta
de Montault v. United States
Auguste de Montault, Augustine Rene Therese Montault by her next friend Louis Montault and William Roger de la Chouquais, husband of the said Augustine, Louis Montault, Bernard Dautierre, Valerie Dautierre, Eleanor Dautierre by her next fri
Parks v. Turner
George W. Parks, Plaintiff in Error, v. Sumpter Turner and Henry Renshaw, trading under the commercial firm of Turner & Renshaw. la Louisiana, the Supreme Court of the State reviews the questions of fact as well as of law which are brought
Thredgill v. Pintard
Joseph P. Thredgill, Administrator of Archibald Goodloe, deceased, Appellant, v. John M. Pintard. Where a settler upon -the public lands had a pre-emption right to them and sold them to a person who again sold them to a third party, the ori
Smith v. Clark
Francis O. J. Smith, Appellant, v. Joseph W. Clark, et al. Where a motion is made to docket and- dismiss a case under the 43d rule of this court, the certificate of the clerk of the court below, upon which the motion is founded, must state
Binns v. Lawrence
William Binns and C. Stockton Halstead, Plaintiffs, v. Cornelius W. Lawrence. The Tariff Act, passed in 1846, (9 Stat. at Large, p. 44,) enacted duties on glass, as follows, viz. “ Schedule B. Forty per centum ad valorem, Glass cut. “ Sched
President of the Miners' Bank v. Iowa ex rel. District Prosecuting Attorney
The President, Directors, and Company of the Miners’ Bank of Dubuque, Plaintiffs in Error, v. The State of Iowa, on the Relation of the District Prosecuting Attorney. Where a bank was chartered and its charter repealed by the legislature of
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.