Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1851 Cases
96 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Saltmarsh v. Tuthill
Alanson Saltmarsh, Plaintiff in error, v. James W. Tuthill. In a suit by the ’indorsee against the indorser of a bill, where the dgfgnce was usury, • the drawer and drawee were incompetent witnesses, when offered to prove certain facts, whi
Miller v. Austen
Henry Miller, Plaintiff in error, v. David Austen, William S. Wilmerding, and David Austen, Jr., Defendants. A statute of Ohio declares all promissory notes, -drawn for a sum certain, payable to any person or order, or to any person or his
United States v. McCullagh
The United States, Appellants, v. William and Alexander McCullagh and James Cornahan, Trustees of the heirs of Alexander McCullagh and David McCaleb. 'The, act of June 17, 1844, (5 Stat. at Large, 676,) reviving the act of 1844, gives juris
Morsell v. Hall
James S. Morsell, Special Bail of William Smith, Plaintiff in error, v. Henry A. Hall. In Maryland, it is correct to take a recognizance of bail before two justices of the ieace. ere a scire facias was issued against special bail, who plead
Lord v. Goddard
Sampson B. Lord and George W. Jenness, Plaintiffs in Error, v. John Goddard. Where an action was brought against certain persons for giving a commercial letter . of recommendation with intention to defraud and deceive, whereby the party to
Weems v. George
Alexander H. Weems, Plaintiff in Error, v. Ann George, Conelly George, Rose Ann George, wife of John Steen, Mary Ann George, wife of Thomas Conn, Nancy George, wife of James Gilmour, Margaret George, wife of William Miller, John Steen, Thom
Coffee v. Planters Bank
Thomas J. Coffee, Plaintiff in Error, v. The Planters Bank of Tennessee. By the eleventh section of the. Judiciary Act, 1 Stat. at Barge, 78, no action can be brought in the Bederal courts upon a promissory note or other chose in.action, by
Hogan v. Ross ex rel. Patterson
Smith Hogan, Arthur S. Hogan, and Reuben Y. Reynolds, Plaintiffs in error, v. Aaron Ross, who sues for the use of Robert Patterson. Where a declaration contained two counts, one of which set out an injunction-bond with the condition thereto
Buckingham v. McLean
John S. Buckingham and Mark Buckingham, Appellants, v. Nathaniel C. McLean, Assignee, in Bankruptcy of John Mahard, Jr. Where a bill in chancery was filed by the assignee of a bankrupt, claiming certain shares of bank stock, the same .being
Buckingham v. McLean
John S. Buckingham and Mark Buckingham, Appellants, v. Nathaniel C. McLean, Assignee in Bankruptcy of John Mahard, Jr. Where a defendant in error or an appellee wishes to have a case dismissed because no citation has been served-upon him, h
Mitchell v. Harmony
David D. Mitchell, Plaintiff in Error, v. Manuel X. Harmony. In some of the States it is the practice for the court to express its opinion npon facts, in a charge to the jury'. In these States, it is not improper for the Circuit Court of th
Williamson v. Barrett
Euclid Williamson, Thomas F. Eckert, and John Williamson, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Alexander B. Barrett, Robert Clark, Nathaniel D. Terry, Henry Lyne, James T. Donaldson, William Brown, and John B. Sprowle. The_usage upon the Kiver Ohio is,
Parish v. Murphree
Henry Parish, Daniel Parish, Leroy M. Wiley, John R. Marshall, Thomas P. Norris, and Thomas Parish, merchants and partners trading under the firm and style of Parish & Co., Appellants, v. Caleb Murphree, Administrator of George Goffe, decea
Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad v. Louisa Railroad
The Richmond, Fredericksburg, and Potomac Railroad Company, Plaintiffs in Error, v. The Louisa Railroad Company. The legislature of Virginia incorporated the stockholders of the Richmond, Fredericksburg, and Potomac Railroad Company, and in
Bradford v. President of the Union Bank of Tennessee
John D. Bradford and Benjamin M. Bradford, Appellants, v. The President, Directors, and Company of the Union Bank of Tennessee. Where there was a contract for the sale of land for the purchase of which indorsed notes were given, but before
Barrow v. Hill
Robert R. Barrow, Plaintiff in error, v. Nathaniel B. Hill. Where the only exceptions taken in the court below were to the refusals of the coiirt to continue the case to the next term; and it appears that the continuance asked for below and
United States v. Ferreira
The United States, Appellants, v. Francis P. Ferreira, Administrator of Francis Pass, deceased. The treaty of 1819, between the United Státes and Spain, contains the following stipulation, viz.: — “The United States shall cause satisfaction
McCormick v. Gray
Cyrus H. McCormick, Appellant, Charles M. Gray, and William B. Ogden. Where two partners assigned ail. their partnership property to a trustee with certain instrpetions how to dispose of it, and afterwards agreed between themselves to appoi
Doe ex dem. Hallett v. Beebe
John Doe, Ex. Dem. Hallett & Walker, Executors of Joshua Kennedy, deceased, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Alfred R. Beebe, George W. Hilliard, Alexander M. Carr, Charles T. Ketchum and John Horsfeldt. The principles established in the eases of 3
Ballance v. Forsyth
Charles Ballance, Plaintiff in error, v. Robert Forsyth, Lucien Dumain, and Anthony R. Bovis. On the 15th of May, 1820, Congress passed an act (3 Stat. at . Large, 605,) for the benefit of the inhabitants of the village of Peoria, by which
Darrington v. Branch of the Bank of Alabama
John Darrington, Lorenzo James, and Robert D. James, Plaintiffs in error, v. The Branch of the Bank of the State of Alabama. John Darrington and Lorenzo James, v. Same. The bills of a banking corporation, which has corporate property, are n
Crawford v. Points
Alexander Crawford, Appellant, v. James Points, Assignee in Bankruptcy of Henry Hottle. An appeal does not lie to this court, from the decision of a District Court in a ease of bankruptcy. Even if it would, the decree of the District Court
United States v. Pillerin
The United States, Appellants, v. Armand Pillerin and others ; The United States, Appellants, v. A. B. Roman ; The United States, Appellants, v. Carlos de Villemont’s heirs and others ; The United States, Appellants, v. Jean B. Labranche’s
United States v. Hughes
The United States, Appellants, v. Joseph Hughes. The decision in the two preceding cases again affirmed. This was a land case arising under the acts of 1824 and 1844, and came up by appeal from the. District Court of the United States for L
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.