Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1859 Cases
115 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Rey v. Simpson
Alexander Rey, William R. Marshall, and Joseph M. Marshall Partners under the name, style, and firm, of Marshall & Co., Plaintiffs in Error, v. James W Simpson. Where an endorsement upon a promissory note was made, not by the payee, but by
Berthold v. McDonald
Pierre A. Berthold and others, Plaintiffs in Error, v. James McDonald and Mary McRee. Where the decision of the Supreme Court of a State was against the validity of a title to land derived from a confirmation by the board of commissioners s
Ward v. Thompson
Eber B. Ward, Survivor, &c., Owner of the Steamboat Detroit, Appellant, v. Charles Thompson. Where certain parties joined together to carry on an adventure'in trade for their mutual benefit — one contributing a vessel, and the other his ski
Refeld v. Woodfolk
Louis L. Refeld, A. B. K. Thetford, and Terrence Farrelly, Executors, Mary F. Notrebe, Widow, and Edward C. Morton and his Wife, Mary F. Morton, Heirs of Frederick Notrebe, deceased, Appellants, v. William W. Woodfolk. The Real Estate Bank
United States v. Widow & Heirs of West
The United States, Appellants, v. the Widow and Heirs of Marcus West, deceased. Where a grant of land in California was genuine, and issued by the proper authority, a fraudulent attempt to alter it by erasures and interlineations for the pu
United States v. Walker
The United States, Plaintiffs in Error, v. John J. Walker The United States, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Arthur F. Hopkins. The United States, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Richard Lee Fearn. The act of Congress, passed on the 7th of May, 1822, (3 St
United States v. Heirs of de Haro
The United States, Appellants, v. The Heirs of Francisco de Haro, deceased. 'Vhere property in California has been in the undisturbed possession of the claimant and his heirs for sixteen years, without any other person claiming or-exercisin
Executors & Heirs of de Yturbide v. United States
The Executors and Heirs of Augustin de Yturbide, deceased, Appellants, v. The United States. Tne 12th section of the act of 31st of August, 1852, providing for an appeal from the board of land commissioners in California to the District Cou
United States v. Widow, Heirs, & Executors of Hartnell
The United States v. the Widow, Heirs, and Executors, of William E. P. Hartnell, deceased. Tks law of Mexico, passed in 1824, directs that it shall not be permitted to unite in one hand, as property, more than one league of irrigable land,
McMicken's Executors v. Perin
Charles McMicken’s Executors, viz: William Crossman, Freeman G. Carey, and William M. F. Hewson, v. Franklin Perin. Where a bill of review was filed, alleging that the decree was obtained by fraud, which allegations were denied in the answe
United States v. Garcia
The United States, Appellants, v. Rafael Garcia. Where there was an an order from the Governor allowing a claimant to search -for land in California, and the claimant subsequently petitioned the Gcvernoi for a grant, who referred the petiti
Clark v. Bowen
Henry O. Clark, Ira Justin, Jun., and A. Hyatt Smith, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Henry C. Bowen, Theodore McNamee, Samuel P. Holmes, and Henry L. Stone, Defendants. An. arrangement was made between creditor and debtor houses, that the latter s
Kimbro v. Bullitt
Joseph Kimbro, Plaintiff in Error, v. Cuthbert Bullitt, Thomas D. Miller, and Lloyd D. Addison, Partners in Trade under the name and style of Bullitt, Miller, & Co. Where bills of exchange were drawn by tbe principal acting partner of A fir
Collins v. Thompson
Sidney E. Collins, Appellant, v. Drury Thompson, William E. Cleveland, and James Campbell’s Widow, Heirs, and Devisees. Where the complainant set up in his MU that a deed, power of attorney, and other writings, all which,-as alleged, were e
Foster v. Davenport
Phineas O. Foster, Roger A. Heirne, and George J. Blakeslee, Owners of the Steamboat Swan, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Gorham Davenport and others, Commissioners of Pilotage of the Bay and Harbor of Mobile. The principle established in the prec
Sinnot v. Davenport
John C. Sinnot, Samuel Wolf, and James Sands. Plaintiffs in Error, v. Gorham Davenport and others, Commissioners of Pilotage of the Bay and Harbor of Mobile. A law of the State of Alabama, passed, in 1854, requiring the owners’ of steamboat
United States v. Pacheco
The United States, Appellants, v. Rosa Pacheco and others, Devisees under the last Will and Testament of Juan A. Sanchez de Pacheco, deceased. Where there was a grant of land in California included within certain boundaries - laid down on a
Chaffee v. Boston Belting Co.
Edwin M. Chaffee, Plaintiff in Error, v. The Boston Belting Company. Where a patentee, whose patent had been extended according to law, conveyed all his interest
Bondies v. Sherwood
George Bondies, late Master and part Owner of the Steamboat Kate, intervening, &c., Appellant, v. James P. Sherwood, Joseph McClelland, and Barney McGinnis, Libellants. Where there was a coniract for raising a sunken vessel upon certain sti
Lytle v. Arkansas
Robinson Lytle and Lydia L. his Wife, Nathan H. Cloyes, and others, Plaintiffs in Error, v. the State of Arkansas, Charles B. Bertrand, and others. Where the decision of a State court was against the validity of an entry of land which had b
Verden v. Coleman
Samuel Verden, Appellant, v. Isaac Coleman. No appeal can be taken from the final decision of a State court- of last resort, under the 25th section of the judiciary act, to- the Supreme Court of the ' United States. A writ of error alone ca
Maxwell v. Moore
David Maxwell, and Thomas Watkins and Mary Watkins his Wife, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Israel M. Moore, Madison M. Morris, Henry Morris, James P. Kellen, John F. Black, James F. Batte, and William M. Craig. An act of Congress, passed in 1812,
United States ex rel. Crawford v. Addison
The United States ex relatione Richard R. Crawford v. Henry Addison. Where the matter in controversy was the right to the mayoralty in Georgetown, the salary of which office was $1,000 per annum, payable monthly, and the deration of which o
Gonzales v. United States
Juan Jose Gonzales, Appellant, v. The United States. Where a grant of land in California describes it by name and boundaries, and then states that the land of which donation is made is one league in length and three-quarters of a league in
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.