Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1866 Cases
134 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Jones v. La Vallette
Jones v. La Vallette. A judgment in the Circuit Court of Louisiana in the ordinary action by petition and summons upon a promissory note cannot be brought into this court by appeal. 'It must come here, if at all, on writ of error. A judgmen
The Pearl
The Pearl. A British vessel .captured during the rebellion and our blockade of the Southern coast, by an American war steamer, on her way from England to Nassau, N. P., condemned as intending^ run the blockade; Nassau being a port which, th
Goodrich v. The City
Goodrich v. The City. 1. Where a matter is directly in issue and adjudged in a court of common law, that judgment may bo éet up as.an estoppel in a court of admiralty. 2. Where an action is brought in a State court against a city for its ne
United States v. Commissioner
United States v. The Commissioner. A mandamus will not be granted to compel the performance of an office, such as the issuing of a patent for land, in a case where numerous questions of law and fact arise, some of them depending upon circum
The Bird of Paradise
The Bird of Paradise. 1. Ship-owners, as a general rule, have a lien upon the cargo for the freight, and consequently may retain the goods after the arrival of the ship at the port of destination until the payment is made. Presumption is in
Insurance Co. v. Ritchie
Insurance Company v. Ritchie. The jurisdiction of the Circuit Courts in original suits between citizens of the same State, in internal revenue cases, conferred or made clear by the act of June 30, 1864, “to provide internal revenue,” &c. (1
United States v. Pico
United States v. Pico. 1. When, in Mexican, grants, boundaries are given, and a limitation upon the quantity embraced within the boundaries is intended, words expressing such intention are generally used. In their absence the extent of the
The Sir William Peel
The Sir William Peel. 1. Regularly, in cases of prize, no evidence is admissible on the first hearing, except that which comes from the ship, either in the papers or the testimony of persons found on board. 2. If upon this evidence the case
Insurance Co. v. Chase
Insurance Company v. Chase. One of five trustees of a church edifice, being the agent of an Insurance Company, accepted a risk in it from another of the trustees to whom the church was indebted, the policy being in the individual name of th
Hansbrough v. Peck
Hansbrough v. Peck. 1. Where in part performance of an agreement a party has advanced money, or done an act, and then stops short and refuses to proceed to its conclusion, the other party being ready and willing to proceed and fulfil all hi
The Eddy
The Eddy. 1. Contracts of affreightment are maritime contracts over which the courts of admiralty have jurisdiction. Either party may enforce his lien by a proceeding in rem in the District Court. 2. In the absence of an agreement to the co
Pervear v. Commonwealth
Pervear v. The Commonwealth. 1. A license from the Federal government, under the internal revenue acts of Congress, is no bar to an indictment under a State law prohibiting the sale of intoxicating liquors. The License Tax Cases, supra, p.
United States v. Vassar
License Tax Cases. United States v. Vassar. “ v. Schureman. “ v. Green. “ v. Beatty. “ v. Shelly. “ v. Bowen. “ v. Swain. “ v. Craft. “ v. Craft. 1. Licenses under the act of June 30, 1864, -‘to provide internal revenue to support the gover
Serrano v. United States
Serrano v. United States. Long-continued and undisturbed possession of land in California, whilst that country belonged to Spain or Mexico, under a simple permission to occupy it from a priest of an adjoining mission, or a local military co
United States v. Armijo
United States v. Armijo et al. 1. The motives which may actuate parties intervening in a California land case to appeal, or the fact that an inconsiderable interest in tho grant is represented by them, can have no influence -upon the decisi
Nichols v. Levy
Nichols v. Levy. 1. Where a State court, — interpreting a statute of its own State, which gave such court jurisdiction to subject legal and equitable interests in real estáte to the claim of creditors, — decided that the statute embraced tr
De Groot v. United States
De Groot v. United States. 1. In bringing appeals to this court from the Court of Claims, the record must be prepared strictly according to the General Kales announced on the subject of that class of appeals at December Term, 1865, and prin
Ewing v. City of St. Louis
Ewing v. City of St. Louis. 1. With the proceedings and determinations of inferior boards or tribunals of special jurisdiction, courts of equity will not interfere, unless it should become nécessary to prevent a multiplicity of suits or irr
The William Bagaley
The William Bagaley. 1 Personal property left in a hostile country by an owner who abandons such country in order to go to the other belligerent, and so to return to his proper allegiance and soil, becomes, qnless an effort is made with pro
The Hampton
The Hampton. 1. In proceedings in prize, and under principles of international law, mortgages on vessels captured jure belli, are to be treated only as lions, subject to being overridden by the capture, not as jura in re, capable of an enfo
The Gray Jacket
The Gray Jacket (motion.) As a general rule, where the United States is a party to a cause and is represented by the Attorney-General, or the Assistant Attorney-General, or by special counsel employed by the Attorney-General, no counsel can
The Gray Jacket
The Gray Jacket. MERITS.) 1. The proclamation of President Lincoln made December 8th, 1863, granting to all persons (with certain exceptions) who had participated in the then existing rebellion, a full pardon, with restoration of all rights
Francis v. United States
Francis v. United States. Although, under the act of 6th August, 1861, “to confiscate property used for insurrectionary purposes,” an informer may file an information along with the Attorney-General, and so make the proceeding enure, under
Townsend v. Greeley
Townsend et al. v. Greeley. 1. The treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo between the United States and Mexico does not divest the pueblo, existing at the site of the city of San Francisco, of any rights of property or alter the character of the inter
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.