Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1866 Cases
134 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Dwyer v. Dunbar
Dwyer v. Dunbar. 1. A letter to a third person, appended to a deposition and professing to give an account of a particular transaction, but not sworn in the deposition to have given a true account of it, is not admissible as part of the dep
Green v. Van Buskirk
Green v. Van Buskirk. 1. Where.personal property is seized and sold under an attachment, or other writ, issuing from a court of the State where the property is, the question of the liability of the property to be sold under such writ, must
Christmas v. Russell
Christmas v. Russell. 1. A State statute which enacts that “no action shall be maintained on any judgment or decree rendered by any court without this State against any person who, at the time of the commencement of the action in which such
Croxall v. Shererd
Croxall v. Shererd. 1. As a general thing, any legal conveyance will have the same effect upon an equitable estate that it would have upon the like estate at law; and whatever is true at law of the latter is true in equity of the former. Th
United States v. Repentigny
United States v. Repentigny. 1. On a conquest by one nation of another, and the subsequent surrender of the soil and change of sovereignty, those of the former inhabitants who do not remain and become citizens of the victorious sovereign, b
Seaver v. Bigelows
Seaver v. Bigelows. In- a creditor’s bill — several creditors joining — to set aside a conveyance of property as fraudulently made, this court has no jurisdiction on appeal if the judgment of the creditor appealing do not exceed $2000. Th9
Myers v. Fenn
Myers v. Fenn. The practice of permitting judgment creditors to come in and make themselves parties to a creditor’s bill, and so obtain the benefit, assuming at the same time their portion of the costs and expenses of the litigation, is wel
Campbell v. City of Kenosha
Campbell v. City of Kenosha. 1. Where the legislature of a State passes two acts, one (which by the constitution it had the power to pass) authorizing a city to subscribe a limited amount ($150,000) of stock' to a railroad, another (which,
Barton v. Forsyth
Barton v. Forsyth. 1. The appellate jurisdiction of this court on writs of error, under the twenty-second section of the Judiciary Act, is confined hy the express words of the section to final judgments, and the writ of error should be addr
Ex parte Milwaukee Railroad
Ex parte The Milwaukee Railroad Company. 1. A case being properly in this court by appeal, the court has a right to issue any writ which may be necessary to render its appellate jurisdiction effectual. 2. Accordingly, it will issue the writ
The Jenny
The Jenny. 3. A vessel sailing through blockaded waters may be properly seized on suspicion of'intent to break the blockade, when, in addition to the manifest bearing date as of a day when only a part of the cargo is laden, the bills of hea
The Teresita
The Teresita. A neutral vessel, at anchor, completely laden with a neutral cargo, on the neutral side of a river dividing neutral from hostile water, washing a blockaded coast, was captured as being subject to just suspicion of ah intent to
The Volant
The second case was that of The Volant. The brig Volant had been captured, near the mouth of the Rio Grande, on the 5th of November, 1863, by the United States steamer Granite City, and, with her cargo, was condemned, by the decree of the D
The Science
Note. At the same time with the preceding appeal and cross-appeal, and by the same counsel, were argued two cases; one an appeal and cross-appeal, as the preceding, from the District Court- of the United States for the Eastern District of L
The Dashing Wave
The Dashing Wave. 1. A neutral, professing to he engaged in tra'de with a neutral port, under circumstances which warrant close observation by a blockading squadron, must keep his vessel, while discharging or receiving cargo, so clearly on
Stanley v. Colt
Stanley v. Colt. 1. Whether words in a devise constitute common law conditions annexed to an estate, a breach of which or any one of which, will work a forfeiture, defeat the devise, and let in the heirs, or whether they are regulations for
Shelton v. Collector
Shelton v. The Collector. 1. Where merchandise receives dafoages during a voyage, proof to aseer- • ’ tain the damage must be lodged at the custom-house of the port where ■ • the goods are landed within ten days after the landing. 2. The da
Hadden v. Collector
Hadden v. The Collector. 1. The title of an act cannot be used to extend or to restrain any positive ■ provisions contained in the body of the act. It is only when the meaning of these is doubtful that resort may be had to the title, and ev
Railroad Co. v. Barron
Railroad Company v. Barron. 1. A railroad company, which grants the use of .its road to another company, is responsible for accidents caused to passengers which it itself carries, by the negligence of the trains of the other company thus ru
Woodworth v. Insurance Co.
Woodworth v. Insurance Company. Where, in ease of a collision, one of two parties injured institutes proceedings against the vessel in fault, and at his own expense prosecutes his suit to condemnation of the vessel, or of the proceeds of he
Parmelee v. Simpson
Parmelee v. Simpson. 1. Where a deed to A., though executed before a mortgage of the same property to B., is not delivered until after the execution and record of the mortgage, the mortgage will take precedence of it. 2. - The placing of a
Watson v. Sutherland
Watson v. Sutherland. The absence of a plain and adequate remedy at law affords the only test of equity jurisdiction, and the application of this principle to a particular case must depend altogether upon the character of the case, as discl
United States v. Weed
United States v. Weed et al. 1. "When the record presents a case in this court which has been prosecuted exclusively.as prize, the property cannot- be here condemned as for a statutory forfeiture. 2. When the record presents a case prosecut
The Peterhoff
The Peterhoff. 1. A blockade is not to be extended by construction. 2. The mouth of the Eio Grande, was not included in the blockade of the ports of the rebel States, set on foot by the National government during the late rebellion; and neu
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.