Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1884 Cases
280 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
New Orleans, Mobile & Texas Railway Co. v. Mississippi ex rel. District Attorney
NEW ORLEANS, MOBILE & TEXAS RAILWAY CO. v. THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, ex rel. The District Attorney. IN ERROR TO THE OIROUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OE MISSISSIPPI. Argued October 15, 1884. Decided October 27, 18
Woodworth v. Blair
WOODWORTH v. BLAIR & Others. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Submitted October 17, 1884. Decided October 27, 1884. In a suit in equity to foreclose a mortgage from a railroad corpora
United States v. Morton
UNITED STATES v. MORTON. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Submitted October 15, 1884. Decided October 27, 1884. The time of service of a cadet in the Military Academy at West Point, from July 1st, 1865, to June 15th, 1869, is to be regarded
Moore v. Greenhow
MOORE v. GREENHOW, Treasurer. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COtTRT OE APPEALS OE THE STATE OE' VIRGINIA. ,. Antoni v. Greenhow, 107 IJ. S. 769, deciding that the Act of Yirginia-of January 14,1882, affords an adequate remedy to the tax-payers req
Marye v. Parsons
MARYE, Auditor, and Others, v. PARSONS. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP VIRGINIA. The contract right óf a coupon-holder under the Virginia act of March 30, 1871, whereby his coupons are receiva
Pleasants v. Greenhow
PLEASANTS v. GREENHOW, Treasurer. ARPEAOS FBOM THE CIRCUIT COUET OF THE UNITED STATES FOR ^ THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. This ease falls wifchin'the decision in Garter y. Greenhow, ante, page 317. Mr. William H. Moyall, Mr. Daniel H. C
Carter v. Greenhow
CARTER v. GREENHOW. IN EEEOE TO THE CIRCUIT COUBT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. The 16th clause of § 639 Rev. Stat.. authorizing suits, without reference to the sum or value in controversy or the citizenship of
Allen v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
ALLEN, Auditor, & Another v. BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES I OR-THE 'WESTERN DISTRICT OP VIRGINIA. Tie general questions arisingand argued in this case are fully discussed and decided
Chaffin v. Taylor
CHAFFIN v. TAYLOR. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA. This case ialls within the decision in Poindexter v. Greenhow, ante, page 270, ' and is decided by it. Mr. William L. Roy all, Mr., Daniel H. Chamberlain
White v. Greenhow
WHITE v. GREENHOW, Treasurer. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE .UNITED STATES EOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OE VIRGINIA. This case falls within the decision in Poindexter v. Greenhow, and is decided by it, ante, 270. . Mr. William L. Boyaill
Poindexter v. Greenhow
POINDEXTER v. GREENHOW, Treasurer. IN' ERROR TO'THE HÜSTINGS COUBT OE THE OITY OE' RICHMOND, STATE OE VIRGINIA. In an action of detinue for personal property,, distrained by the defendant for delinquent taxes, in payment of which the plaint
Killian v. Ebbinghaus
KILLIAN v. EBBINGHAUS. ORIGINAL. Submitted April 21st, 1884 Decided May 5th, 1884. Mandate — Practice. An appeal was taken from the court below by appellant under an incorrect description, not corresponding with the title in the court below
Friend v. Wise
FRIEND & Another v. WISE. IN error to the circuit court of the united states.for the DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.. Submitted April 31st, 1884. Decided May 5th, 1884. Jurisdiction. In ejectment in which several defendants are joined who hold sepa
Harrington v. Holler
HARRINGTON & Another v. HOLLER. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE WASHINGTON TERRITORY. Submitted April 21st, 1884. Decided May 5th, 1884. Practice. . A decision of the Stípreme Court of a Territory dismissing a writ of error to a District C
Baines v. Clarke
BAINES, Administrator v. CLARKE & Another. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF WEST. VIRGINIA. Argued April 25th, 1884. Decided May 5th, 1884. Contract — Interest. A conveyed to B a large quantity of land
St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. v. Burton
ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS & MANITOBA RAILWAY COMPANY v. BURTON. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. . Submitted April 21st, 1884. Decided May 5th, 1884. Evidence — WafuraUzation. It is not necessary
Killian v. Clark
KILLIAN, Administrator, v. CLARK. APPEAL PROM THE.SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Submitted April 17th, 1884. Decided May 5th, 1884. Appeal Grigsby v. Purcell, 99 U. S. 595, that"“-an appeal will be dismissed, when, at , the term
Nickle v. Stewart
NICKLE and Another v. STEWART and Another. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF- THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF WFST VIRGINIA. Argued April 17th, 1884. Decided May 5th, 1884. Review. A bill presented as a bill of review showing no error
Greenwood v. Randall
GREENWOOD & Others v. RANDALL. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF MONTANA. Argued April 9th, 1884. Decided May 5th, 1884. Practice. If a record fails to present in proper form the questions argued by counsel, the judgment wil
Edrington v. Jefferson
EDRINGTON v. JEFFERSON & Another. APPEAL • FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. Argued April 24th, 25th, 1884. Decided May 5th, 1884. Removal of Causes. When all the defendants in a cause in a S
City & County of San Francisco v. Scott
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO & Another v. SCOTT. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Submitted January 18th, 1884. Decided May 5th, 1884. Jurisdiction. The decision of the State Courts of California upon the questi
Ex parte Hitz
EX PARTE: HITZ, Petitioner. ORIGINAL. Argued March. 4th, 5th, 1884. Decided May 5th, 1884. Certiorari — Diplomatic privilege. A writ of certiorari when applied for by a defendant is not a writ of right but discretionary with the court. On a
Butchers' Union Slaughter-House & Live-Stock Landing Co. v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.
BUTCHERS’ UNION SLAUGHTER-HOUSE AND LIVESTOCK LANDING COMPANY v. CRESCENT CITY LIVE-STOCK LANDING AND SLAUGHTER-HOUSE, COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP LOUISIANA. Argued April 9th, 10th
Factors' & Traders' Insurance v. Murphy
FACTORS’ & TRADERS’ INSURANCE COMPANY v. MURPHY & Another. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. Submitted April 18th, 1884. Decided May 5th, 1884. Bankruptcy — Mortgage—Sale. This court has jurisdiction in error over a j
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.